To examine trends in the frequency and costs of emergency hospital admissions in acute wards for mental health conditions among children and young people in England between 2012 and 2022 and to assess socioeconomic and geographic disparities in these costs.
Retrospective observational cohort study using routinely collected administrative data.
Secondary care acute wards; analysis includes all National Health Service (NHS) hospital admissions in England.
All emergency hospital admissions in acute wards for individuals aged 5–18 years with a primary or secondary mental health diagnosis recorded between 2012 and 2022. Exclusion criteria included admissions without a mental health diagnosis or outside the defined age range.
Primary outcomes were the annual number and total cost of mental health-related emergency admissions. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, diagnostic categories contributing to cost, and variation by socioeconomic deprivation and geographic location.
Between 2012 and 2022, the total cost of emergency admissions for mental health among children and young people rose markedly, driven by increases in both admission rates and length of stay. Children from the most socioeconomically deprived areas experienced higher admission rates and greater associated costs. Substantial regional variation in the financial burden was also observed. Eating disorders and self-harm were the main diagnostic categories contributing to the rise in costs. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, total admission numbers declined, but overall costs remained high due to a shift in diagnostic mix towards conditions associated with longer hospital stays and higher per-admission costs.
The increasing financial burden of paediatric mental health crises highlights the urgency of addressing upstream drivers of poor mental health. Policies should prioritise early intervention, reduce regional and socioeconomic disparities, and ensure equitable allocation of mental health resources. Further research should explore the effectiveness of community-based alternatives to hospital care.
Adolescents experiencing emotional distress are at increased risk of developing mental health problems, which can negatively impact their academic performance, social relationships and long-term well-being. Schools provide a key setting for implementing preventive interventions that promote emotional and psychological resilience. This study presents the protocol for a randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multicomponent, school-based intervention grounded in emotional intelligence (EI) in improving mental well-being, EI levels and resilience among adolescents aged 14–16 years experiencing emotional distress.
The trial will be conducted in public and publicly funded secondary schools in Terrassa, Spain, during the 2025–2026 academic year. Eligible participants will be identified using the short version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). The intervention consists of nine 55-minute group sessions delivered during school hours by a nurse and a physiotherapist, supported by the school’s psychopedagogue. Sessions focus on emotional regulation, self-esteem, mindfulness, assertiveness and other socio-emotional skills. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, postintervention and 24-week follow-up. The primary outcome is mental well-being (WEMWBS); secondary outcomes include EI (Trait Meta-Mood Scale-24 items) and resilience (Child and Youth Resilience Measure-32 items). It is anticipated that adolescents in the intervention group will show significantly greater improvements in mental well-being, emotional intelligence and resilience compared with the control group, with effects sustained at follow-up. This study will provide evidence on the effectiveness of a scalable, school-based intervention led by community health professionals. The programme could be integrated into educational and public health strategies to promote adolescent mental health and reduce emotional distress.
Approved by CEIm Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (01-24-1CR-102). Low-risk study; predefined procedures are in place for participants at risk (eg, suicidal ideation, abuse) with referral pathways to health/social services. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and a plain-language summary to schools/stakeholders.
Older age is one of the greatest risk factors of dementia, and the rural demographic is ageing in Canada. Compared with their urban counterparts, rural older adults often face unique challenges in accessing cognitive healthcare, which is exacerbated by a shortage of healthcare specialists, public transportation, finances, education, services and dispersed geography. This scoping review protocol outlines the methodology that will be used to examine the literature about the care priorities, service needs and lived experiences from the perspectives of rural older adults living with cognitive impairment and dementia in Canada.
Our scoping review protocol will follow the guidance of Arksey and O’Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extensions for Scoping Reviews checklist. Our search strategy will identify relevant peer-reviewed literature in databases including Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. The database search dates for this scoping review will be from 1 January 2015 to 1 January 2025. The data will be charted by two reviewers using a standardised data extraction table. Inductive content analysis will be performed using a three-step process.
Given this scoping review will be an examination of the published literature, human subjects will not be included in this research. Therefore, ethics approval is not required. Knowledge mobilisation and dissemination strategies will include peer-reviewed journal articles, conference presentations, community workshops, newsletter articles and webinars. This study may provide valuable information for healthcare practitioners, community leaders and policymakers working to support people living with cognitive impairment and dementia in rural communities.
Despite the known haemostatic action of emicizumab (Hemlibra) in haemophilia A patients, its role in the prevention and control of bleeding in high-demand haemostatic situations, such as major surgery, remains to be determined. Patients receiving regular emicizumab prophylaxis often require concomitant factor VIII (FVIII) therapy during major surgery to prevent uncontrolled bleeding and to promote postoperative healing. However, there are limited prospective surgical data relating to concomitant FVIII and emicizumab use. Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq) is a B-domain deleted recombinant FVIII produced in a human cell line without chemical modification or protein fusion with proven efficacy as surgical prophylaxis in adult and paediatric patients. The Nuwiq for Perioperative management Of patients With haemophilia A on Emicizumab Regular prophylaxis (NuPOWER) study aims to examine perioperative efficacy and safety of simoctocog alfa in haemophilia A patients on emicizumab prophylaxis undergoing major surgery.
NuPOWER is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicentre study that will be conducted at approximately 15 centres worldwide. Up to 28 male patients ≥12 years with severe haemophilia A and no FVIII inhibitors will be recruited. All patients must be receiving regular emicizumab prophylaxis and scheduled to undergo a major surgical procedure during which concomitant simoctocog alfa will be administered. The primary endpoint is the overall haemostatic efficacy of simoctocog alfa, adjudicated by an independent data monitoring committee using a pre-defined algorithm, and will consider intraoperative and postoperative efficacy assessments by the surgeon and investigator, respectively. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative haemostatic efficacy, postoperative haemostatic efficacy, number of allogeneic blood products transfused, perioperative FVIII plasma levels (as measured by FVIII activity) and thrombin generation, and safety parameters. In the era of non-factor therapy, NuPOWER will generate valuable prospective data on concomitant use of simoctocog alfa and emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A undergoing major surgery.
Ethical approval has been received from institutional review boards/independent ethics committees, and the study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts and presentations at scientific meetings.
CT EU 2022-502060-21-00; NCT05935358.