Shared decision making (SDM) is advocated as an approach for patient-centred asthma care. However, this approach may not always be feasible or preferred by patients and/or healthcare professionals (HCPs). Knowledge and insights into whether and how the preferred collaboration style in medical decision making is discussed and managed during consultations for severe asthma are limited.

To investigate how HCPs’ and patients’ preferred collaboration styles in treatment decision making are experienced, discussed and managed during consultations.

Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews with HCPs specialised in severe asthma and a focus group with severe asthma patients in The Netherlands. Inductive thematic analysis was used, with results reported according to the COREQ checklist.

Four themes concerning HCPs’ and patients’ experiences were identified: (1) overall preference for SDM, yet (2) ambiguity of SDM’s content, (3) variation in application of SDM and (4) friction between medical focus and patient autonomy in SDM. A fifth theme concerned the discussion and management of collaboration style preferences: limited metacommunication. HCPs and patients seem unable to identify each other’s preferences in collaboration styles. Overall, a lack of communication regarding how to collaborate in making treatment decisions was found. Varying views on meaning and content of collaboration styles, especially SDM, and HCPs’ medical focus seemed to contribute to the lack of communication.

With the lack of communication regarding preferences in collaborating, HCPs and patients are likely to miss out on effective collaboration. Future studies should explore how views and preferences regarding HCP-patient collaboration can be bridged.

To describe the prevalence and characteristics of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM) practice and product use by the population of the UK providing up-to-date data on the landscape of TCIM use in the UK.

A cross-sectional online survey, administered using the Qualtrics platform, among adults (aged 18 years and over) residing in the UK (England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland). Data were collected between May and October 2024. The 40-item instrument covered four domains: demographics, health status, use of health products and practices, and use of health services. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise survey responses, and ² tests were applied to assess associations between participant characteristics and TCIM use. Backwards stepwise logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of TCIM use across four outcome categories (p≤0.05).

The sample (n=1559) was broadly representative of the UK population. Prevalence of any TCIM use over a 12-month period was 65.9% with 19.1% consulting a TCIM practitioner and 63.3% using any TCIM product or practice. Bodywork therapists (massage therapists 9.4%, chiropractors 7.9%, yoga teachers 5.0%) and homeopaths (4.1%) were the most commonly consulted TCIM practitioners and Anthroposophic doctors were the least commonly consulted (2.1%). Among TCIM products, vitamin and mineral supplements were the most commonly used (37.3%) and relaxation or meditation practices were reported by 19.4% of respondents. TCIM users were more likely to be female, identify as Asian or Black, have a chronic disease diagnosis, report good health, possess private health insurance, have a higher education level, be employed (or seeking employment) and sometimes experience financial management difficulties.

There is substantial use of TCIM across the UK adult population and there is a need for more research on integrating TCIM into mainstream healthcare and the National Health Service. Clear strategies are necessary to enhance communication between TCIM and conventional healthcare providers, ensure patient safety and promote person-centred, coordinated models of care.