FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Multicentre pragmatic embedded stepped wedge cluster randomised trial comparing glucose 5% with sodium chloride 0.9% as the default drug diluent in the ICU: the sweet-water trial protocol

Por: Hardenberg · J.-H. B. · Hinz · R. M. · Pigorsch · M. · Uhrig · A. · Müller-Redetzky · H. · Nee · J. · Schroeder · T. · Witzenrath · M. · Trost · U. · Zickler · D. · Hunsicker · O. · Weiss · B. · Weber-Carstens · S. · Spies · C. · Tampe · B. · Borgstedt · R. · Abu-Tair · M. · Zarbock · A
Introduction

Hypernatraemia, defined as a plasma sodium concentration >145 mmol/L, is a frequent complication in critically ill patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) (= ICU-acquired hypernatraemia), with reported prevalence ranging from 4% to 26%. Hypernatraemia adversely affects various physiological functions and is associated with delirium, prolonged length of stay and increased ICU and post-discharge mortality. The sodium load from intravenous drug diluents significantly contributes to ICU-acquired hypernatraemia, with drug infusions comprising about 30% of the daily fluid volume of an average ICU patient. This study aims to investigate if using glucose 5% solution as the default drug diluent, instead of sodium chloride 0.9%, can reduce the prevalence of ICU-acquired hypernatraemia and improve patient outcomes.

Methods and analysis

To test the effectiveness of glucose 5% solution as the default drug diluent, we will conduct a multicentre, pragmatic, embedded, open-label, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial. The study will include twelve clusters (ICUs and one intermediate care unit) across six hospitals in Germany, with a projected total sample size of 4485 patients. In line with the stepped-wedge cluster-randomised design, one ICU will transition every 4 weeks, in a randomised sequence, from using sodium chloride 0.9% as the default drug diluent to glucose 5%.

The primary endpoint is the prevalence of hypernatraemia >150 mmol/L through day 28. The number of days alive and free of the ICU through day 28 will be tested hierarchically as a key secondary endpoint. Other exploratory endpoints include ICU mortality, ICU-free days, hospital-free days and other clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint will be analysed using a logistic mixed-effects model.

Ethics and dissemination

The trial was approved by the Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin Ethics Board and by the ethics board of each enrolled hospital. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.

Trial registration number

The trial protocol was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register on 21 June 2024 prior to initiation of patient enrolment (DRKS00033397).

Effects of an extended therapeutic strategy versus standard-of-care therapy on persistent acute kidney injury in high-risk patients after major surgery: study protocol for the randomised controlled single-centre PrevProgAKI trial

Por: Sadjadi · M. · Strauss · C. · von Groote · T. · Booke · H. · Schöne · L. M. · Sauermann · L. · Wempe · C. · Gerss · J. · Kellum · J. · Meersch · M. · Zarbock · A.
Introduction

Persistent acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. In patients with an already established AKI, the new urinary biomarker C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) can predict a persistent AKI. However, it is still unknown whether the implementation of nephroprotective measures in patients with an already established moderate/severe AKI can positively influence the trajectory of AKI and patients’ outcome.

Methods and analysis

The PrevProgAKI trial is a randomised, controlled, single-centre trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of nephroprotective measures in patients with established moderate/severe AKI. We aim to enrol 480 patients with moderate or severe AKI (Kidney Disease: Imroving Global Outcomes, KDIGO, stage 2 or 3) within 72 hours of major surgery. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either standard of care (control group) or an extended therapeutic strategy that consists of different supportive measures (intervention group). The randomisation will be stratified by urinary CCL14 results (CCL14

Ethics and dissemination

The PrevProgAKI trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chamber of Physicians Westfalen-Lippe and the University of Muenster (no. 2021-569 f-S). Results will be disseminated widely and published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and will guide patient care and further research.

Trial registration number

NCT05275218 (clinicaltrials.gov), first posted 11 March 2022.

❌