The COVID-19 pandemic threatened global HIV Test and Treat Efforts. We assessed whether it affected (1) the number of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiations and (2) the proportion of timely ART initiations in people living with HIV (PLWH) globally.

Quasi-experimental, regression discontinuity design using routinely collected data from HIV clinics.

360 HIV care clinics across primary and secondary levels of care, participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS consortium, in 31 countries in Asia, Africa and the Americas.

177 391 PLWH (≥18 years old) who initiated ART 2 years before and 1 year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in their country.

The primary outcome was the number of ART initiations per week; the secondary outcome was the proportion of timely ART initiations (ie, ART initiated within 7 days of enrolment). We assessed changes in these outcomes in the 52 weeks after compared to the 104 weeks before the pandemic onset, defined using each country’s peak Oxford Stringency Index score between January and June 2020.

Among 177 391 newly enrolled PLWH, 129 743 initiated during the pre-pandemic and 47 648 post-pandemic onset. 72.5% of ART initiations were timely pre-pandemic whereas 82.3% were during the pandemic. Absolute number of ART initiations remained stable during the pandemic period in 25 of 31 countries but decreased significantly in six countries: India (–5.0 p, 95% CI –9.2 to –0.7), Rwanda (–10.0 p, –18.6 to –1.4), Malawi (–33.4 p, –54.1 to –12.3), South Africa (–130.8 p, –188.6 to –73.1), Zimbabwe (–12.9 p, –20.0 to –5.8) and Togo (–19.6 p, –39.1 to –0.1). The proportion of timely initiations was stable in all countries except in Kenya (+4.2 pp, 95% CI +0.3 to +8.1) and in Mozambique (+2.7 pp, +0.5 to +4.9), where it increased significantly.

A deeper understanding of the factors that contributed to sustaining ART initiations, particularly in settings with stringent public health and social measures, is needed. These insights should inform preparedness strategies, resource allocation and policy development to ensure continuity of HIV services during future health emergencies, in line with World Health Organisation recommendations.

Qualitative evidence in ovarian cancer (OC) doctor-patient-caregiver communication is scarce. This study explored the information needs of patients and caregivers, comparing these to healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) perspectives, to uncover why gaps exist.

Qualitative, observational, multicentre and cross-sectional study with OC patients, their caregivers and HCPs. Qualitative data were collected through remote semistructured interviews. Themes were identified using thematic analysis. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and the disease-specific EORTC QLQ-OV28 were collected as quality of life measures and analysed descriptively.

Patients were recruited during their routine visits in five university hospitals in Spain.

Patients were ≥18 years of age in stages III or IV according to FIGO classification, were on first line treatment or recurrent and platinum sensitive with the most complex molecular profiles. 19 patients, 7 caregivers and 10 HCPs participated in the study.

Three main themes emerged: (a) patient information needs about the disease and pharmacological treatments, (b) patient information needs about non-pharmacological support and (c) caregiver information needs. The first theme was viewed through three differing attitudes (the Involved, Trusting and Indecisive), with HCPs’ agreeing with the attitudes but without adjusting transmitted information accordingly. For the second theme, patients expressly desired more information on psychosexual issues, psychological support and patient associations (PAs), and HCPs concurred with a need for more non-pharmacological support. Regarding the third theme, caregivers expressed not being engaged by HCPs, despite HCPs recognising their importance, with nurses being more empathetic than oncologists on this matter.

These results highlight the importance of understanding the information needs of OC patients and their caregivers. This understanding enables HCPs to provide better support, helping patients and caregivers make more informed health decisions.