To assess the implementation feasibility and acceptability of a structured digital psychosocial communication tool (DIALOG+) to strengthen the quality of person-centric care in psychiatric settings within Pakistan and India.

A hybrid inductive and thematic qualitative analysis using individual interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs).

Two psychiatric hospitals (Karwan-e-Hayat and Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre) in Karachi, Pakistan and one psychiatric care organisation (Schizophrenia Research Foundation) in Chennai, India

Interviews were conducted with 8 mental health clinicians and 40 patients who completed the DIALOG+ pilot as well as wider stakeholders, that is, 12 mental health clinical providers, 15 caregivers of people with psychosis and 13 mental health experts.

A technology-assisted communication tool (DIALOG+) to structure routine meetings and inform care planning, consisting of monthly sessions over a period of 3 months. The intervention comprises a self-reported assessment of patient satisfaction and quality of life on eight holistic life domains and three treatment domains, followed by a four-step solution-focused approach to address the concerns raised in chosen domains for help.

Key insights for the implementation feasibility and acceptability of DIALOG+ were assessed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis of 22 IDIs and 8 FGDs with 54 individuals.

Clinicians and patients ascribed value to the efficiency and structure that DIALOG+ introduced to consultations but agreed it was challenging to adopt in busy outpatient settings. Appointment systems and selective criteria for who is offered DIALOG+ were recommended to better manage workload. Caregiver involvement in DIALOG+ delivery was strongly emphasised by family members, along with pictorial representation and relevant life domains by patients to enhance the acceptability of the DIALOG+ approach.

Findings highlight that the feasibility of implementing DIALOG+ in psychiatric care is closely tied to strategies that address clinician workload. Promoting institutional ownership in strengthening resource allocation is essential to reduce the burden on mental health professionals in order to enable them to provide more patient-centric and holistic care for people with psychosis. Further research is required to explore the appropriateness of including caregivers in DIALOG+ delivery to adapt to communal cultural attitudes in South Asia.

To identify clustered trajectories of self-reported disability following the initiation of care by a physical therapist in outpatient orthopaedic settings and to determine baseline factors that distinguish between different trajectories.

Retrospective cohort study using electronic health record and patient-reported outcome data.

Data were extracted from the ATI Patient Outcomes Registry, encompassing patient encounters from over 900 ATI outpatient physical therapy clinics in 26 states across the USA.

Patients receiving physical therapy after surgery were excluded. The final analytical sample included 597 245 unique patients initiating care between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2021 for management of a spine, upper extremity or lower extremity musculoskeletal condition.

Patients received treatments which could include strengthening and range of motion exercises, manual therapy, education, functional training and pain-relieving modalities.

The primary outcome was trajectory of self-reported, joint-specific disability measure scores up to 6 months following initial evaluation.

Three distinct disability trajectory clusters were identified (proportion of sample; beta coefficient (95% CI)): significant immediate worsening (3.4%; –1.31 (–1.33, –1.28)), significant gradual improvement (61.4%; (0.36 (0.35, 0.36)) and minimal change (35.2%; –0.20 (–0.21, –0.19)). Results were similar when stratified by primary diagnosis of upper extremity, lower extremity or spine conditions, with small differences in the relative proportion of trajectory class membership by body region. Predictive factors for less favourable disability trajectories included older age, lower physical and mental health scores, body region, higher social deprivation index, insurance type and certain comorbidities.

Most patients showed improvement in disability after exposure to treatment by a physical therapist, but a notable proportion experienced minimal change or worsening. Multiple demographic, physical, mental and social health factors differentiated trajectory class membership, highlighting opportunities to improve how and to whom this type of guideline-supported non-pharmacological care is delivered.

Sarcopenia and frailty have been identified as negative predictors of health outcomes. Patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), knee osteoarthritis (OA) and breast cancer commonly experience low physical activity levels in the chronic phase of recovery. This prospective study aims to explore the feasibility of multimodal screening and longitudinal tracking of various biomarkers from the acute to chronic phase of disease to determine the relationship with frailty outcomes.

A prospective longitudinal observational cohort study involving Asian populations is planned over 3 years. Enrolled participants with index conditions of acute stroke, TBI, knee OA and breast cancer will be recruited from rehabilitation hospitals and clinics and followed longitudinally. Reference thresholds from the Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia will be used. Variables include self-reported questionnaires, disease and comorbidity characteristics, anthropometric measurements, appetite questionnaires, muscle ultrasound (MUS), muscle/bone mass, blood biomarkers and markerless gait motion systems. In particular, physical performance (short physical performance battery and hand grip strength), sarcopenia (SARC-F questionnaire) and frailty assessment (FRAIL score, clinical frailty scale), four-region MUS, body composition analysis, dual X-ray absorptiometry, bone mineral densitometry, physical activity levels (International Physical Activity Questionnaire for the elderly [IPAQ-E], fitness trackers) and health-related quality of life assessment (EuroQoL-5D questionnaire five level [EQ5D-5L]) will be used. Blood biomarkers measuring metabolic health (eg, glycated haemoglobin, cholesterol, fasting glucose and 25-OH vitamin D) and inflammation (eg, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha [TNF-α] and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 [MCP-1]) will be measured at baseline. Data collection will take place at postrecruitment baseline (hospital admission), 1, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years postrecruitment (inpatient) and at postrecruitment baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years postrecruitment (outpatient).

Ethical approval has been obtained from the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board (2023/00105). Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in scientific journals.

NCT06073106.