Advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC) represents a significant clinical challenge. This study aimed to evaluate patient (age and comorbidities) and disease (histological subtypes and stages) characteristics, treatment patterns and survival outcomes in a real-world French healthcare setting.

In this national, multi-centre, retrospective observational cohort study, 200 patients with advanced or recurrent EC receiving first- or second-line chemotherapy during the year 2019 were analysed. Data collected included baseline characteristics, treatment regimens, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS).

127 and 73 were included in the first and second lines, respectively. Endometrioid carcinoma was the most represented histological subtype (62.0%). Patients in the first line, of whom 31.5% had FIGO (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie Obstétrique) IVB disease, mainly received a combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel (78.0%), while 131 patients receiving second-line therapy were mainly administered anthracycline (54.2%). Median rwPFS and OS were, respectively, 8.5 and 13.2 months for patients receiving first-line therapy and 4.0 and 9.4 months for patients receiving second-line therapy. In Cox analyses, a diagnosis of carcinosarcoma, the presence of liver metastases and stage IVB disease were associated with worse survival outcomes for patients recieving first-line chemotherapy. Non-platinum chemotherapy and liver metastases were associated with poorer survival in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy.

This study highlights the landscape of metastatic EC treatment in a real-world French setting before the availability of PD1 inhibitors, emphasising the discrepancy between clinical trial data and real-world outcomes. It underscores the necessity for further real-world studies to complement clinical trials for a comprehensive understanding of metastatic EC management.

To assess the implementation feasibility and acceptability of a structured digital psychosocial communication tool (DIALOG+) to strengthen the quality of person-centric care in psychiatric settings within Pakistan and India.

A hybrid inductive and thematic qualitative analysis using individual interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs).

Two psychiatric hospitals (Karwan-e-Hayat and Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre) in Karachi, Pakistan and one psychiatric care organisation (Schizophrenia Research Foundation) in Chennai, India

Interviews were conducted with 8 mental health clinicians and 40 patients who completed the DIALOG+ pilot as well as wider stakeholders, that is, 12 mental health clinical providers, 15 caregivers of people with psychosis and 13 mental health experts.

A technology-assisted communication tool (DIALOG+) to structure routine meetings and inform care planning, consisting of monthly sessions over a period of 3 months. The intervention comprises a self-reported assessment of patient satisfaction and quality of life on eight holistic life domains and three treatment domains, followed by a four-step solution-focused approach to address the concerns raised in chosen domains for help.

Key insights for the implementation feasibility and acceptability of DIALOG+ were assessed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis of 22 IDIs and 8 FGDs with 54 individuals.

Clinicians and patients ascribed value to the efficiency and structure that DIALOG+ introduced to consultations but agreed it was challenging to adopt in busy outpatient settings. Appointment systems and selective criteria for who is offered DIALOG+ were recommended to better manage workload. Caregiver involvement in DIALOG+ delivery was strongly emphasised by family members, along with pictorial representation and relevant life domains by patients to enhance the acceptability of the DIALOG+ approach.

Findings highlight that the feasibility of implementing DIALOG+ in psychiatric care is closely tied to strategies that address clinician workload. Promoting institutional ownership in strengthening resource allocation is essential to reduce the burden on mental health professionals in order to enable them to provide more patient-centric and holistic care for people with psychosis. Further research is required to explore the appropriateness of including caregivers in DIALOG+ delivery to adapt to communal cultural attitudes in South Asia.