To explore the experiences of clinicians providing pastoral and mental health services to racially and ethnically minoritised students (REMS) at UK universities, aiming to understand the challenges REMS face in accessing support and to identify ways to improve service inclusivity.

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

Student health and well-being services at five universities in the North East of England, a region with comparatively low racial diversity.

Ten clinicians (nine female, one male; nine White British, one other ethnic background; mean age 42.8 years) working in therapeutic roles with experience supporting REMS. Participants were recruited via opportunity sampling.

Semi-structured interviews, averaging 44 min, were video-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis to identify key themes.

Six overarching themes were identified: (1) the chokehold of layered systemic challenges, (2) dynamics of power, (3) lack of safety for REMS, (4) "Am I really getting it?", (5) psychological therapies for white people by white people and (6) the thirst for expertise. Clinicians were enthusiastic about providing culturally responsive care but reported limited access to reflective spaces and training. Contextual factors—including racism, Brexit and the marketisation of higher education—were perceived to affect service delivery and REMS’ engagement with mental health support. Business-model approaches to service provision were sources of frustration.

Clinicians face structural and systemic challenges in providing culturally sensitive mental health support to REMS. Enhancing staff training, reflective practice and service adaptation may improve access and efficacy. Findings offer practical insights for universities aiming to strengthen equity in student mental health services, and future work could evaluate interventions to increase clinician preparedness and REMS engagement.

To adapt the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG), Ariadne Labs, Massachusetts USA, to a local Singapore version and evaluate its acceptability.

Qualitative study using semistructured interviews.

49 participants (30 patients with serious illnesses, five family caregivers and 14 healthcare providers (HCP)) recruited from three public hospitals in Singapore.

Face-to-face or virtual indepth interviews.

Guided by the Heuristic Framework and Cultural Sensitivity model, we employed a multi-stage iterative design. Starting with the original SICG, we iterated the guide following three rounds of cognitive interviews among patients followed by expert consultation (n=4) to derive a local version, subsequently reviewed by caregivers and HCP. We assessed acceptability of the SICG using traffic light colour codes—red (unacceptable), orange (needs change) and green (no change) and gathered suggestions to rephrase them. Using content analysis, we compared acceptability of questions as proportion of red, orange and green responses at each interview round and inductively derived themes reflecting views towards the guide.

The original SICG showed low acceptability, and most questions received high proportions of red responses. Negative words and phrases dampening hope, lack of comprehension due to complex framing and cultural insensitivity to prognostic discussions were key themes reflecting low acceptability. Surface and deep structural revisions that centred around positive framing with hopeful language, focusing on current values and individualising conversations (‘use if appropriate’ prompts) significantly improved the guide’s acceptability.

We derived a local Singapore SICG that aligns with the core elements of the original guide and fosters cultural sensitivity. The adapted version could be further tested in other Asian countries.

This study aims to identify the key factors driving excessive alcohol and salt consumption in Ghana, both of which are modifiable risk factors for diseases such as cardiovascular conditions and cancers. Using the socio-ecological model (SEM), we qualitatively examine stakeholder perspectives to gain a comprehensive understanding of the influences contributing to these unhealthy consumption patterns.

A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically, with identified drivers mapped onto the corresponding levels of influence within the SEM.

The study included 21 purposively sampled stakeholders from government and academic institutions in Ghana, including policymakers, practitioners and researchers.

Drivers of excessive salt and alcohol consumption were identified across all five levels of the SEM. At the intrapersonal level, disregard for health risks was a key factor. Community-level drivers included easy access to unhealthy foods and cultural norms promoting alcohol use at social events and salt in traditional dishes. At the societal and policy levels, inadequate regulation of the alcohol and food industries was found to reinforce lower-level drivers, further encouraging unhealthy consumption.

This study highlights the multilevel influences on alcohol and salt consumption, emphasising the interactions across SEM levels. It highlights that addressing unhealthy consumption is not solely a matter of personal responsibility, demonstrating that societal and policy factors play a significant role in shaping health and dietary behaviours. The findings underscore the need for comprehensive public health strategies that address influences at multiple levels to effectively reduce excessive alcohol and salt intake.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) impacts over 55 million individuals worldwide and remains the leading cause of dementia (60–70% of cases). By 2050, South and Southeast Asia are projected to have an older adult population more than double, bearing a major share of Alzheimer’s disease burden. This will exert a heavy strain on healthcare systems, particularly in resource-limited countries where support and infrastructure are already stretched. Despite this, no review has yet explored the regional epidemiology and associated risk factors in this context. Thus, this study protocol outlines to synthesise prevailing evidence from these densely populated regions, particularly low- and middle-income nations within South and Southeast Asia.

This review will include studies that reported epidemiological characteristics including prevalence, age of onset, mortality, and risk factors of AD and related dementias comprising in South and Southeast Asian regions. Studies published in any language from inception to date will be extracted from PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE and APA PsycNet, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. We will also search grey literature sources and screen the reference lists of the articles selected for full-text review to identify additional relevant studies. Observational studies including case–control, cohort, and cross-sectional designs reporting desired outcomes will be included and appraised for quality assessment with the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (mNOS). The included articles will be appraised by two independent reviewers, with a third resolving any conflicts. Pooled estimates of prevalence, age of onset and mortality will be analysed using random effect meta-analysis (REML) model. Associated risk factors, including modifiable and non-modifiable will be narratively synthesised. Forest plots will be used to visualise the findings, and heterogeneity across the included studies will be assessed using the I² and Cochrane’s Q statistics. Potential publication bias will be assessed using a funnel plot along with the Begg’s and Egger’s tests. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses will also be conducted to assess the robustness of pooled estimates and to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis will be conducted using Rstudio (v.4.3.2) and GraphPad Prism V.9.0.2.

The systematic review is focused on the analysis of secondary data from published literature; thus, no ethical approval will be needed. The protocol will follow international standard guidelines, findings will be reported in a reputed journal and disseminated through (inter)national conferences, webinars and key stakeholders to inform policy, research and AD management strategies.

CRD 420251047105.

Black adults are generally exposed to more stressors over the life course and, due to the intersections of racism and economic and social resources, they tend to have more limited resources to cope with social stressors than white adults. This mismatch between stress exposures and resources may lead to dysregulated responses or reactivity to stressors and contribute to persistent racial disparities seen in adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). Prior studies examining stress exposures have been hampered by the challenge of capturing stress exposures comprehensively, given they are manifold, dynamic and accumulate over time. The Stress Reactivity and Maternal Health Study seeks to overcome this limitation by examining the impact of physiological and psychological stress reactivity to everyday stressors on APOs.

We are recruiting 700 nulliparous self-identified non-Hispanic black and white pregnant individuals from academic medical centres in the USA. We use ecological momentary assessments administered via smartphones to collect repeated measurements of exposure to everyday stressors throughout the day over the course of seven consecutive days at two different time points mid-pregnancy (14–22 weeks and 22–28 weeks). At the same time, we collect intensive measurements of heart rate variability, blood pressure, salivary cortisol and positive and negative affect. We will use mixed-effects models to estimate personalised indicators of cardiovascular, neuroendocrine and affective reactivity to everyday stressors. We will then use linear and logistic regression modelling to examine associations of these personalised indicators of stress reactivity with placental histological lesions and the occurrence of APOs. Finally, we will use the gap-closing estimand method to quantify the extent to which racial disparities in adverse placental and pregnancy outcomes are explained by differences in prenatal stress exposure and prenatal stress reactivity.

The Northwestern University institutional review board (IRB) approved this study and serves as the single IRB of record (STU00218683). All participants will sign an informed consent document prior to participation, and data will be treated confidentially. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals, briefs, infographics and presentations.

Evaluating skin reactions is crucial in topical product development. Turmeric/epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) emulgel demonstrates therapeutic potential for cutaneous diseases, warranting further investigation in human studies. The Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) of skin irritation and sensitisation potential caused by the turmeric/EGCG emulgel is designed to evaluate the safety of the investigational product in healthy volunteers prior to conducting the efficacy study in patients with dermatological diseases.

60 healthy Thai volunteers will be enrolled in this single-centre, double-blind HRIPT pilot clinical trial to evaluate skin irritation and sensitisation potential caused by turmeric/EGCG emulgel. Primary endpoints include the number and proportion of participants exhibiting skin irritation and sensitisation, while secondary endpoints focus on the frequency and severity of adverse events. The study will comprise a screening period, a 3-week induction phase, a 2-week rest phase and a 1-week challenge phase. Fully occlusive adhesive patches containing study products will be applied to participants’ backs 10 times. Skin irritation will be assessed using the Draize dermal irritation scoring system, and skin sensitisation will be evaluated using the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group scoring system.

The Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, approved this study protocol and related documents on 6 March 2025 (Ref. No. 108/2025).

TCTR20250317007.