To explore the use, parameters, safety and outcomes of physical rehabilitation for adults with sepsis.

We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.

Studies were eligible for inclusion in the study if they included: (1) adults 18 and older, (2) with a previous diagnosis of sepsis, (3) using a physical rehabilitation intervention at any point of sepsis management, (4) published in English or French.

We searched seven databases and screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full texts and performed data extraction independently and in duplicate. We summarised findings narratively using the "population, context, concept" framework and used descriptive statistics where appropriate. End-users reviewed and commented on study findings.

We included 58 studies, representing 77 434 participants, with the majority (79%) being published in the last decade. A large proportion (36%) of physical rehabilitation interventions included exercise and were overseen by a physical therapist (41%). The parameters of the interventions varied widely. However, all interventions (100%) were hospital based and the interventions implemented appeared safe. Of the 28 studies evaluating effectiveness of the intervention, function improved in most studies (78%) following physical rehabilitation.

Research addressing physical rehabilitation for patients with sepsis is increasing. Physical rehabilitation appears safe and may improve functional outcomes in those with sepsis. Future research should report details of intervention parameters and evaluate rehabilitation post-hospital discharge to maximise impact on function and quality of life for sepsis survivors.

The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework Registries (Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2EPJ6).

Community-acquired pneumonia is the leading global cause of infection-related death. A subset of patients with pneumonia develops aberrant immune responses, resulting in harmful inflammation, tissue damage and significant mortality. Immunomodulatory therapies aim to blunt this dysregulated immune response and reduce resultant injury. No consensus exists on the use or impacts of immunomodulatory therapies in the management of community-acquired pneumonia. This protocol describes the methods we will use to undertake a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the effects of immunomodulatory therapies on the mortality of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

We will undertake a systematic review and network meta-analysis investigating the use of immunomodulatory therapies in community-acquired pneumonia. Our protocol has been developed and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines and prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024565301). The primary objectives of this work are to compare the impact of immunomodulatory therapies on 28-day and 90-day mortality in adult patients admitted to hospital with a primary diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. The secondary objectives of this work are to identify any differences in the effectiveness of these immunomodulatory therapies in managing community-acquired pneumonia of differing aetiology and severity.

We will conduct a literature search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Global Health for all relevant articles until 30 June 2024. All observational, interventional and epidemiological studies published in English will be included, and each type of study design will be examined separately. All studies will have their titles and abstracts independently screened by two reviewers, followed by a full article eligibility review and data extraction. A third reviewer will adjudicate any disagreements. Data extracted will include, but not be limited to, the study design, country in which it was undertaken, patient characteristics (eg, age, sex, cause of CAP, severity of CAP), details regarding the immunomodulatory therapy and dosing used and the 28-day and 90-day mortality of each study arm.

The risk of bias will be assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Exposure tool for non-randomised studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomised control trials. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations for network meta-analysis framework. A quantitative synthesis of data is planned for 28-day and 90-day mortality rates.

We will fit a random-effects network meta-analysis model that includes random effects for between-study heterogeneity and for inconsistency. This will be done using the metafor package for R. We will use a contrast-based approach, modelling estimated treatment effects using reference treatments. In the case of the primary objective, this will be the log odds ratio (OR) of mortality in one treatment compared with another.

Each type of study design will be examined separately. Treatments using the same immunotherapy at different doses may be grouped if appropriate.

This will be a systematic review of published literature; therefore, ethical approval is not required. To ensure communication of our findings, we will publish our results in a peer-reviewed journal and present our findings at appropriate local, national and international meetings.

CRD42024565301.

Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) are often prescribed clopidogrel in order to reduce their risk of major adverse limb and cardiovascular events. Clopidogrel is metabolised by the CYP2C19 enzyme and genetic variations in CYP2C19 are common. These variants can influence an individual’s ability to metabolise clopidogrel to its active metabolite. Few studies have investigated the relationship between patient genotype and outcomes in vascular surgery. This work aims to establish the relationship between patient genotype and outcomes after revascularisation in patients with CLTI who are prescribed clopidogrel. It will consider whether pharmacogenetics can be used to ensure patients are prescribed effective medications to optimise their outcomes.

This is an observational cohort study of patients undergoing lower limb surgical, endovascular or hybrid revascularisation for CLTI at Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust. Patients taking clopidogrel post-procedure, as well as those prescribed a non-clopidogrel based medication regimen, will be recruited prior to or shortly after revascularisation. Patients will undergo CYP2C19 genotyping and will be followed up using online records. The study has 90% power to detect 114 amputations with a target sample size of 483 participants. The primary outcomes are risk of amputation at 1 year and a composite endpoint for the risk of major adverse limb events (MALE) or death from any cause at 1 year. Secondary outcomes are risk of MALE at 1 year, risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or death from any cause at 1 year, death within 30 days of revascularisation, minor re-interventions at 1 year, total number of re-interventions at 1 year and rate of systemic or gastrointestinal bleed at 1 year.

Risk of amputation, MALE and MACE will be analysed using Cox models. All remaining outcomes will be analysed using negative binomial models. Potential competing events for the risk of amputation will be investigated as part of a sensitivity analysis. Patients given a non-clopidogrel-based medication will be compared as an additional analysis.

Manchester University Research Ethics Committee approval obtained as part of the Implementing Pharmacogenetics to Improve Prescribing (IPTIP) trial process (IRAS 305751). The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences.

This work is a sub-protocol for the IPTIP study which is registered as ISRCTN14050335.