Although important learnings come from traditionally designed large prospective asthma cohorts, highly restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria limit generalisability to clinical practice. Moreover, small sample sizes for important disease subtypes, narrow scope of clinical data collection and limited biomarker assessments reduce the power of some studies to detect important and diverse longitudinal disease courses. The Real-world and Genomic data-based Asthma Insights through Network Analysis (REGAIN) study takes a novel approach to asthma cohort development by employing a pragmatic definition of asthma and simplified study procedures for biospecimen and data collection. REGAIN will produce a large scale, real-world, longitudinal clinical and molecular description of asthma powered to characterise and compare clinically relevant asthma subtypes. This design will provide insights on distinct longitudinal trajectories of disease, predictors of response to therapies and likelihood of clinical remission, all of which should help guide asthma management.

REGAIN is a clinical observational retrospective and prospective cohort study designed to determine large scale, real-world longitudinal clinical and molecular descriptions of asthma according to types of treatment, level of asthma control and inflammatory biology based on clinical biomarkers. Key questions include predictors of change in asthma control as well as timing and durability of clinical remission on biological therapy. To complement these clinical insights, REGAIN will produce one of the largest multiscale data sets in asthma that will include demographic and clinical features, inflammatory biomarkers, responses to therapy with inhaled steroids and other inhaled controllers with or without asthma biologics, and serial airway epithelium and peripheral blood transcriptomics and proteomics. REGAIN targets enrolment of 780 participants with asthma fitting one of five prespecified asthma subtypes with the aim of better characterising under-studied groups and allowing comparative analyses to elucidate important differential therapeutic responses and clinical trajectories. We target enrolment of 400 healthy controls to provide a healthy state molecular description of the tissues sampled in REGAIN participants with asthma. Participants with asthma are followed prospectively for 18 months with assessment of longitudinal clinical status including prospective clinical data collection, integration of electronic medical record data and serial biospecimen collection at 6 and 18 months. Participants with asthma starting treatment with asthma biologics undergo additional clinical assessment and biospecimen sampling at 3 months to track early clinical and molecular response to therapy. Healthy participants without asthma are evaluated cross-sectionally on enrolment without longitudinal follow-up in order to compare molecular profiles for airway epithelium and blood. An optional study component for participants with asthma employs a mobile phone application, digital inhaler monitors and home digital peak flow measurements and contributes data on real-time medication use, serial lung function and geolocated environmental data relevant to asthma.

The REGAIN protocol and all amendments were approved by The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Program for Protection of Human Subjects (PPHS19-0358), and all participants provided written informed consent. Enrolment began in November 2019 and was completed in February 2024. Results will be presented at local, national and international meetings, and results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for consideration for publication.

NCT06623435.

Outcome from large vessel occlusion stroke can be significantly improved by time-critical thrombectomy but treatment is only available in regional comprehensive stroke centres (CSCs). Many patients are first admitted to a local primary stroke centre (PSC) and require transfer to a CSC, which delays treatment and decreases the chance of a good outcome. Access to thrombectomy might be improved if eligible patients could be identified in the prehospital setting and selectively redirected to a CSC. This study is evaluating a new specialist prehospital redirection pathway intended to facilitate access to thrombectomy.

This study is a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with included health economic and process evaluations. Clusters are ambulance stations (or teams) which are work bases for ambulance practitioners. Intervention allocated ambulance practitioners use the Specialist PrE-hospital rEDirection for ischaemic stroke thrombectomY (‘SPEEDY’) pathway which comprises initiation according to specific criteria followed by contact with CSC staff who undertake a remote assessment to select patients for direct CSC admission. Control allocated ambulance practitioners continue to provide standard care which comprises admission to a local PSC and transfer to a CSC for thrombectomy if required. A co-primary outcome of thrombectomy treatment rate and time from stroke symptom onset to thrombectomy treatment will evaluate the impact of the pathway. Secondary outcomes include key aspects of emergency care including prehospital/hospital time intervals, receipt of other treatments including thrombolysis, and performance characteristics of the pathway. A broad population of all ambulance practitioner suspected and confirmed stroke patients across participating regions is being enrolled with a consent waiver. Data about SPEEDY pathway delivery are captured onto a study case record form, but all other data are obtained from routine healthcare records. Powered on a ‘primary analysis population’ (ischaemic stroke patients with pathway initiation criteria), 894 participants will detect an 8.4% difference in rate and data from 564 thrombectomy procedures will detect a 30 minute difference in time to treatment. The full study population is estimated to be approximately 80 000. Regression modelling will be used to examine primary and secondary outcomes in several analysis populations. The economic analyses will include cost-effectiveness and cost–utility analyses, and calculation of willingness to pay at a range of accepted threshold values. The process evaluation involves semi-structured interviews with professionals and patient/family members to explore views and experiences about the SPEEDY pathway.

This study has ethical, Health Research Authority and participating NHS Trust approvals.

Dissemination of study results will include presentations at national and international conferences and events, publication in peer-reviewed journals, and plain English summaries for patient/public engagement activities.

ISRCTN77453332.