Conectar
To test a theoretical model examining the impact of the work environment on nurses' physical and mental health issues, job burnout, and healthcare productivity.
This cross-sectional study employed structural equation modelling to test a theoretical model linking work environment, physical and mental health issues, job burnout, and healthcare productivity. Data were collected from 600 staff nurses using validated self-report questionnaires administered at one medical teaching hospital and two regional hospitals in Taiwan.
The work environment was significantly associated with healthcare productivity, nurses' physical and mental health issues, and job burnout. Physical and mental health issues were positively related to job burnout, which, in turn, negatively impacted healthcare productivity.
A supportive work environment plays a critical role in promoting nurses' well-being, reducing burnout, and improving productivity. This study advances the understanding of work environment factors that nurse administrators can target for improvement.
Modifying key organisational and interpersonal aspects of the work environment and cultivating a more supportive culture may enhance nurses' well-being, reduce turnover, and improve workforce productivity.
This study adhered to STROBE guidelines for observational studies as per the Equator network.
No patient or public contribution.
Insomnia is a common complaint among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) maintained on buprenorphine (BUP). However, people with OUD have historically been excluded from insomnia clinical trials, leaving clinicians without evidence-based treatment options for this patient population. Lemborexant, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dual orexin receptor antagonist for the treatment of insomnia, was recently shown to be safe and tolerable among a sample of patients with insomnia who were maintained on BUP. We hypothesise that pharmacologically antagonising the orexin system with lemborexant may improve insomnia symptoms in individuals with OUD and also enhance BUP treatment benefits by improving performance in neurofunctional domains identified in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Phenotyping Assessment Battery.
Participants with insomnia and OUD who have been stabilised on BUP for at least 4 weeks will be randomly assigned to receive either lemborexant (n=50) or placebo (n=50) for 8 weeks. Participants will complete assessments at baseline, during the 8-week intervention, postintervention and at a 2-week follow-up. Primary outcomes are insomnia severity and impulsivity. Secondary measures include objective sleep metrics (total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset) and performance in the neurofunctional domains of negative emotionality and metacognition.
The study was approved by the Virginia Commonwealth University Institutional Review Board in April 2025 (protocol number HM20031777). Data collection began in May 2025 and is expected to be completed by May 2029. The trial is conducted under FDA IND no. 154797 (FGM). The dissemination plan for the trial includes presentations at local and national conferences, submission of primary and secondary outcome manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed journals and circulation of findings to popular media outlets, as available. Results will also be shared with interested participants and clinical collaborators upon completion of the trial.
A novel advanced synthetic bioactive glass matrix was studied in patients with non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Bioactive glasses can be constructed to be biocompatible, with water-soluble materials in multiple geometries including fibre scaffolds that mimic the 3D architecture of a fibrin clot. In this trial, chronic, Wagner Grade 1 DFUs were randomised to receive borate-based bioactive glass Fibre Matrix (BBGFM) plus standard of care (SOC) therapy for 12 weeks or SOC alone. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of subjects that obtained complete wound closure at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included time to achieve complete wound closure at 12 weeks. In the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis, 48% (32/67) treated with BBGFM plus SOC healed at 12 weeks compared to 24% (16/66) with SOC alone (p = 0.007). In the per protocol (PP) population, 73% (32/44) of subjects treated with BBGFM plus SOC healed versus 42% (16/38) in the SOC group (p = 0.007). Based on the success of this trial, BBGFM demonstrates faster healing of DFUs compared to SOC and should be considered in the treatment armamentarium for Wagner Grade 1 DFUs. Future trials should investigate the use of BBGFM for healing deeper chronic DFUs, other wound aetiologies, or complex surgical wounds.
To systematically summarise evidence related to the use of non-sterile gloves when preparing and administering intravenous antimicrobials.
Scoping review.
A rigorous scoping review was undertaken following Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework and the modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review guidelines (2018). Five databases and grey literature were included in the search. Literature published between 2009 and 2024 was included.
Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science) and the grey literature were searched in February 2024.
Three studies were included; however, none directly addressed correct non-sterile glove use during intravenous antimicrobial preparation or administration in clinical practice.
We found no evidence to support the use of non-sterile gloves in intravenous antimicrobial preparation. There is an urgent need for rigorous research to inform the development of clear guidelines on non-sterile glove use to underpin evidence-based decision-making in nursing and other health professional education, improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs and promote environmental sustainability in healthcare.
Inappropriate use of non-sterile gloves for preparing and administering intravenous antimicrobials hinders correct hand hygiene practices and increases healthcare-associated infections, healthcare costs and waste.
A critical gap in the existing evidence was a key finding of this review, highlighting the urgency for evidence-based guidelines to improve patient safety outcomes, reduce healthcare costs and promote environmental sustainability in healthcare.
This scoping review adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QY4J2).
To evaluate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions on functional status, quality of life and readmission rates of stroke patients.
Quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis.
Studies with interventions to ease the hospital-to-home transition of stroke patients that were delivered by multidisciplinary teams consisting of registered healthcare professionals from at least two disciplines were included. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for quality appraisal.
Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched for randomised controlled trials delivering transitional care interventions to hospitalised stroke patients.
Thirty-one randomised controlled trials were included in the final review. The studies featured multidisciplinary teams of two to nine professionals, most commonly nurses, physicians and physiotherapists. Although multidisciplinary care improved functional status and quality of life scores, the impact on readmission rates was inconclusive. Meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in functional status when care involved physicians, care coordinators (often nurses) or had teams of more than two healthcare professionals. Significant improvement in quality of life was also reported when care involved physicians or in teams with more than two healthcare professionals.
Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions show promise in improving functional status and quality of life after stroke. Their effectiveness depends on team composition and coordination, particularly the inclusion of physicians and care coordinators. Future research should address reporting gaps and evaluate broader strategies to reduce hospital readmissions.
Impact (Addressing)
What problem did the study address? ○
The effectiveness of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions for stroke patients.
○Evaluated the role of various healthcare professionals within these teams.
What were the main findings? ○
Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions significantly enhance stroke patients' functional status, especially within the first 3 months.
○Teams with care coordinators (often nurses) and supportive physicians improve functional outcomes, with effective communication being crucial despite underreporting of specific practices.
○Teams comprising of more than two health professionals can significantly improve stroke patients' functional status.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? ○
Healthcare institutions and providers: The findings can guide healthcare institutions in developing and implementing effective transitional care services for stroke patients.
○Stroke patients: Patients receiving multidisciplinary transitional care are likely to experience enhanced functional recovery and improved ability to perform daily activities.
○Policymakers and researchers: The study highlights the need for more detailed reporting and research on communication practices within multidisciplinary teams and the importance of evaluating underreported outcomes like readmission rates.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To synthesise evidence related to risk factors of falls among younger mental health inpatients age ≤65 years old.
Hospitalised patients with mental illness are at increased risk of falling. Specific risk factors for falls for younger inpatients are poorly understood.
Systematic review.
Medline, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies published in English till December 2022. The review followed the 2020 PRISMA checklist. Odds ratios and P values of significant risk fall factors and the frequency of factors related to circumstances of falls were extracted.
Nine studies were included and 95 risk factors, across seven categories were extracted. These categories included socio-demographic, fall-related factors, functional status, health and mental status, psychiatric diagnosis and assessment, medication, and staff related factors. Factors related to medication, health and mental status are most reported. Majority of the patients sustained minor or no injury from the fall and circumstances of fall vary across studies.
Factors strongly associated with risk of falls were dizziness, use of psychotropics and antihypertensive drugs. A meta-analysis of risk factors was not possible due to different dependent variables studied, controlled confounding variables and control groups used.
Fall prevention is relevant to all patients in mental health settings. Approaches to fall risk assessment and management need to be better tailored to younger mental health patients in the psychiatric setting.
Patient or public contribution was not possible because of the study design.
Background
Despite the effect of maternal breast cancer on many children, there is no valid or reliable quantitative measure of the concern that children attribute to their mothers' disease, which constrains both science and clinical practice.
Objectives
This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate the initial measures of child-reported, illness-related concerns associated with maternal cancer.
Methods
The study was conducted in three phases: scoping review, item extraction from a battery of items obtained from school-aged children about general issues related to their mothers' breast cancer, and testing of the three proposed structural models of these extracted items using confirmatory factor analysis. The scoping review yielded five categories of illness-related concerns: altered family routines, uncertainty, concerns about illness contagion, maternal death, and maternal well-being. To reflect these five categories, 18 items were extracted from a 93-item questionnaire completed by 202 school-aged children regarding their mothers' breast cancer. Next, three structural models were hypothesized to assess the construct validity of illness-related concerns: five-, three-, and one-factor models. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test and compare the models.
Results
The five-factor model best fit the data, and each factor showed adequate internal consistency reliability. These findings align with the a priori five-factor model informed by the scoping review.
Conclusion
The results provide initial evidence of the construct validity of the 18-item Children's Illness-Related Concerns Scale, which can be used to assess children's concerns and inform future intervention studies. Background
Engagement with self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) declines, on average, over time but may vary substantially by individual.
Objectives
We aimed to describe different 1-year patterns (groups) of self-monitoring of BP behaviors, identify predictors of those groups, and examine the association of self-monitoring of BP groups with BP levels over time.
Methods
We analyzed device-recorded BP measurements collected by the Health eHeart Study—an ongoing prospective eCohort study—from participants with a wireless consumer-purchased device that transmitted date- and time-stamped BP data to the study through a full 12 months of observation starting from the first day they used the device. Participants received no instruction on device use. We applied clustering analysis to identify 1-year self-monitoring, of BP patterns.
Results
Participants had a mean age of 52 years and were male and White. Using clustering algorithms, we found that a model with three groups fit the data well: persistent daily use (9.1% of participants), persistent weekly use (21.2%), and sporadic use only (69.7%). Persistent daily use was more common among older participants who had higher Week 1 self-monitoring of BP frequency and was associated with lower BP levels than the persistent weekly use or sporadic use groups throughout the year.
Conclusion
We identified three distinct self-monitoring of BP groups, with nearly 10% sustaining a daily use pattern associated with lower BP levels. 
FreshRSS 