This study investigates the rates of military sexual trauma (MST) and its associations with adverse mental health among a sample of UK female ex-service personnel who served during the Iraq/Afghanistan eras.

Female ex-service personnel, who participated in the fourth phase (Phase 4) of the King’s Centre for Military Health Research (KCMHR) Health and Well-being Cohort Study (2022–2023) and consented to be recontacted for follow-up studies (n=295), are being invited to participate in an online questionnaire between July 2024 and February 2025. The questionnaire contains surveys and questions related to experiences of sexual harassment and sexual assault during and outside of military service, disordered eating and broader female health issues. While the questionnaire relates to several female health topics, this study focuses on the surveys related to experiences of sexual trauma and eating disorders. Sociodemographic variables and some health variables, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex PTSD, common mental disorders, alcohol misuse, physical somatisation and social support, will be extracted from participants’ pre-existing data collected in Phase 4 of the KCMHR Cohort Study. Analyses will assess rates of MST, and hierarchical multiple logistic regressions will investigate associated health impacts. Rates and ORs, employing 95% CIs, will be reported.

This study has been granted full ethical approval by the King’s College London Research Ethics Committee (Ref: HR/DP-23/24–39040). Participants provide informed consent before participating and have access to a signposting booklet containing contact details for a range of support services. A risk protocol is in place, which outlines the procedure to be undertaken if a participant contacts the research team in distress. Findings will form part of a PhD thesis and will be further disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and dissemination with veteran mental health services and charities, and relevant government departments.

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as the occurrence of two or more spontaneous pregnancy losses from the time of conception until 24 weeks of gestation. Currently, an underlying cause can be identified in only a minority of the losses. Potentially, an impaired maternal immune response targeting the semiallograft pregnancy may lead to miscarriage. While prior studies have explored the use of immune-suppressing corticosteroids to modulate the maternal immune system and hopefully improve pregnancy outcome, the absence of sufficiently powered randomised controlled trials (RCT) underscores the need for further research. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate if prednisolone administration in early pregnancy (20 mg daily for 6 weeks, then tapering doses for 2 weeks) in women with unexplained RPL leads to a higher live birth rate (LBR) in comparison to placebo. Additionally, the study assesses the tolerability, safety and the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. Finally, we will explore the effect of prednisolone in various subgroups (based on maternal age, number of previous pregnancy losses, presence of specific antibodies and pre-pregnancy endometrial immune cell level).

This ongoing multicentre, double-blind RCT will randomise 490 women with unexplained RPL and pregnancy

This study was submitted under the Clinical Trial Regulation (CTR) in Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) for assessment by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) under Clinical Trial number: 2023-503220-76-01. It received full approval on 29/01/2024. Study findings will be presented at conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Participants will be informed about the results by publishing them on the publicly available website of the study.

This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT05725512) and in CTIS (2023-503220-76-01).

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a severe genetic mucocutaneous fragility disorder characterised by chronic blistering, slow wound healing and increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma. Current management options are very limited.

This is a randomised (1:1), placebo-controlled, double-blinded crossover (A/B) trial with an internal phase I dose de-escalation (4+5 design) in the first 3 months and a 12-month continued treatment follow-on open-label study if 3-month outcome data from the crossover trial indicate safe and beneficial effects. RDEB is a rare condition, so we expect to recruit a maximum of 36 participants based on feasibility and not formal power considerations. Participants aged>6 months and x10⁶ cells/kg intravenous infusion of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells or placebo at the start of each crossover period (day 0) and 14 days later. The dose will be de-escalated to 1–1.5x10⁶ cells/kg depending on observed toxicity. For the main crossover trial, the primary outcome is the change in disease severity as measured by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index at 3 months from day 0 infusion. Secondary outcomes measured at 3 and 6 months from day 0 infusion include changes in general clinical appearance of skin disease, pain and itch, and quality of life. Adverse events and serious adverse events will be monitored throughout the trial.

North East—York Research Ethics Committee approved the protocol (ref: 21/NE/0016) on 16 March 2021. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, presented at relevant national and international conferences, and an open-access final report submitted to the funder.

ISRCTN14409785. Protocol V. 8.0, 14 November 2022.

Identifying the underlying cause of acute coma is crucial for improving outcomes in this time-sensitive medical emergency. This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics, incidence, causes and outcomes of acute coma.

A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study.

Among 99 217 322 emergency department (ED) visits between 2000 and 2017, 419 480 acute coma events were identified. After excluding visits with only acute coma diagnosis codes lacking detailed information, individuals without socio-demographic data or those with prior nursing home residence or disability, a total of 205 747 first-ever acute coma cases constituted the final research cohort.

The primary outcomes included the acute coma event rate, incidence rates stratified by age and underlying causes categorised into 23 clinical groups by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classification Software (CCS). Secondary outcomes assessed were reversible coma, hospitalisation rates, 30-day mortality, 1-year medical utilisation and long-term functional outcomes. Cox regression models identified factors influencing long-term mortality.

The overall event rate for acute coma was 4.23 per 1000 ED visits, and the incidence rate was 0.93 per 1000 person-years. The median age of cases was 58.27 years (SD 23.04), with a male predominance (58.90%). Infection and central nervous system (CNS)-related causes were most prevalent. Of these cases, 45.49% experienced reversible coma, 41.66% required hospitalisation and the 30-day mortality group accounted for 12.85%. CNS and drug-related causes contributed to increased 30-day mortality, while psychiatric, alcohol, women’s health and perinatal care, and seizure are causes linked to reversible coma. Patients frequently required intensive care (26.54%), life-sustaining treatments (41.09%) or experienced disability (6.57%) within one year. Generalised estimating equations revealed significantly lower odds of reversible coma for CNS (adjusted OR (aOR), 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.74; p

Infection and CNS disorders were identified as the most common aetiologies of acute coma, with CNS and drug-related causes significantly associated with increased short-term and long-term mortality. This study demonstrates the efficacy of using CCS groups for aggregating International Classification of Diseases codes in acute coma research, providing critical insights for enhancing clinical management and outcomes.

The PREgnancy Care Integrating translational Science, Everywhere Network was established to investigate specific placental disorders (pregnancy hypertension, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and stillbirth) in sub-Saharan Africa. We created a repository of clinical and social data with associated biological samples from pregnant and non-pregnant women. Alongside this, local infrastructure and expertise in the field of maternal and child health research were enhanced.

Pregnant women were recruited in participating health facilities in The Gambia, Kenya and Mozambique at their first antenatal visit or at the time a placental disorder was diagnosed (Kenya and The Gambia only). Follow-up study visits were conducted in the third trimester, delivery and 6 weeks to 6 months postpartum. To elucidate the difference between pregnancy and non-pregnancy biology in these settings, non-pregnant nulliparous and parous women, aged 16–49 years, were recruited opportunistically primarily from family planning clinics in Kenya and Mozambique, and randomly through the Health and Demographic Surveillance System in The Gambia. Non-pregnant participants only had one study visit. Biological samples were processed rapidly and locally, stored initially in liquid nitrogen and then at –80°C, and details entered into an OpenSpecimen database linked to their social determinants and clinical research data.

A total of 6932 pregnant and 1825 non-pregnant women were recruited to the study, providing a repository of clinical and social data and a biorepository of 482 448 samples. To date, baseline descriptive analysis of the cohort has been undertaken, as well as a substudy on the prevalence of COVID-19 in the cohort.

Analysis of data and samples will include an analysis of biomarker and social and physical determinants of health and how these interact in a systemic approach to understanding the origins of common placental disorders. The data from non-pregnant women will provide control data for comparison with the data from normal and complicated pregnancies. Findings will be disseminated to local stakeholders and communities through meetings and ongoing community engagement and globally by publication and presentations at scientific meetings.

Traditionally, surgical intervention has been the standard treatment for children with metopic synostosis, assuming that it reduces the risk of raised intracranial pressure, thereby preventing vision and cognitive impairment, and also restores the abnormal head shape. However, recent research suggests a sporadic occurrence of raised intracranial pressure in patients with metopic synostosis. In addition, following surgery, an overall tendency to have worse cognitive and behavioral outcomes and more refractive errors compared to healthy peers is observed. Research on conservative (non-surgical) treatment in metopic synostosis is limited and lacks a comparative design. The purpose of this study is to compare the (cost-)effectiveness of conservative and surgical treatment in patients with metopic synostosis.

This is the protocol for an observational cohort study with a duration of 8 years. A total of 450 patients with metopic synostosis will be included. The primary outcome is head growth as a predictor for increased intracranial pressure. Non-inferiority with regard to head growth from 0 to 8 years (yearly difference in SD) is determined using a linear mixed model adjusted for potential confounders. Secondary outcomes include papilledema, orthoptic outcomes; forehead shape; cognitive, behavioural and psychological outcomes; and societal costs. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed.

The study has been reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam (MEC-2022-0142). Written informed consent will be obtained from both parents of each participant. The results will be disseminated by publication in international peer-reviewed journals.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06069479.