There are estimated to be 3.4 million patients in the UK living after a diagnosis of cancer. We know very little about their quality of life or healthcare usage. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are tools which help to translate a patient’s quality of life into measurable categories, but how to do this at scale remains underexplored. The study employs a randomised design to assess different engagement strategies for optimising participation, data linkage and questionnaire completion in Northwest London and then nationally, with appropriate research approvals.
We have designed and implemented an online, patient-completed, randomised observational trial. We will pilot it in Northwest London before national roll-out, using initially the General Practice (GP) record of a cancer diagnosis and then exploring the use of social media. The primary objective is to explore the feasibility of recruiting participants via self-identification or contact from the primary care research network and obtaining consent to link participants’ PROMs responses to their cancer registry records. Data collection occurs through a secure platform, with participants directly responsible for data entry. There is no formal target sample size because this is a feasibility study, and we want to explore how many patients we can recruit. Analyses will be conducted using descriptive statistics, repeated measures multilevel modelling and machine learning techniques. If a substantial difference in responses between randomisation arms is detected, ineffective strategies will be removed. If no clear difference is observed, recruitment will continue with periodic reviews based on response rates and data completeness.
The Study Coordination Centre has obtained approval from the London—Surrey Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority. We will publish and disseminate the results in local, national and international meetings, in peer-reviewed journals, on social media and on websites.
It has been registered under ‘Investigating Digital Outcomes for Cancer Survivors in the Community’ (NCT06095024).
NCT06095024: Investigating Digital Outcomes for Cancer Survivors in the Community.
Insomnia is prevalent in psychiatric populations and may contribute to maintain and exacerbate psychiatric symptoms. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBTi) is the treatment of choice also for insomnia comorbid to psychiatric illness. However, patients are rarely offered CBTi in psychiatric outpatient clinics. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to investigate whether CBTi delivered in groups in a psychiatric outpatient clinic is superior to treatment as usual (TAU).
In the Sleep in Psychiatric Care trial, 60 patients with moderate to severe psychiatric illness who meet the criteria for insomnia disorder will be recruited from an outpatient psychiatric clinic in Norway. The patients will be randomised (1:1) either to group-based CBTi (Sleep School Wake Up for Insomnia; SSWU-I) or to a wait list (WL) while they are all receiving TAU for their psychiatric disorder. SSWU-I will comprise five bi-weekly sessions, each lasting 120 min, hence the treatment period is 8 weeks. Assessment will be conducted at baseline (T1) and after 8 weeks (T2). The primary outcome will be self-rated insomnia symptoms using the Insomnia Severity Index and the Bergen Insomnia Scale. Secondary outcomes include measures of symptoms of dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep, depression, anxiety, fatigue, problems with work and social adjustment and well-being. Mixed model analyses will be conducted to test the hypotheses.
Ethical approval has been granted by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, in Western Norway (REK 2020/66304). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at research conferences and in relevant media. The results may document the need for specific sleep-directed treatments in psychiatric clinics as a way of treating insomnia disorder as well as to alleviate psychiatric symptoms.
Circadian rhythm sleep–wake disturbances appear to be prevalent in psychiatric populations and may maintain and exacerbate psychiatric symptoms. Bright light therapy (BLT) is, in addition to exogenous melatonin, the treatment of choice for circadian rhythm disorders like delayed sleep–wake phase disorder (DSWPD) and has yielded promising results in patients with comorbid psychiatric illness. However, such patients are rarely offered this treatment in outpatient clinics. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to investigate whether group BLT for psychiatric outpatients is superior to treatment as usual (TAU).
60 patients with moderate-to-severe psychiatric illness who meet the criteria for DSWPD will be recruited from an outpatient psychiatric clinic in Norway. They will be randomised (1:1) to a group-based Sleep School Wake Up! For Circadian (SSWU-C) programme conjointly with TAU or to TAU while on a wait list for SSWU-C. The SSWU-C will be delivered over four biweekly sessions, each lasting 120 min; hence treatment will last 6 weeks. Assessments will be collected at baseline (T1) and after the intervention (T2). The primary outcome will be changes in sleep timing using measures such as sleep diaries, actigraphy and dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) at 6 weeks postintervention. Secondary outcomes include changes in other sleep metrics, symptoms of depression, anxiety, fatigue, problems with work and social adjustment and well-being. Mixed models will be used for data analyses.
Ethical approval was granted in 2020 by the Regional Ethics Committee in Western Norway (REK 2020/66304). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and be presented at research conferences and in relevant media. The results may document the need for more specific sleep-directed treatments in psychiatric clinics as a way of treating not only circadian rhythm sleep–wake disorders but also as a treatment to alleviate psychiatric symptoms.