Preventing loss of autonomy has become a public health issue due to the increase in healthcare costs associated with ageing. It has become even more pressing with the arrival of the baby-boomer generation. This has given rise to several initiatives. This is the background to the VIVADOM project. The project provides a complete kit for older adults aged 60 years and over living at home. First, the kit includes a technological package (telecare, light path and digital tablet). Then, these older adults benefit from personalised human support provided by postal workers trained in gerontology. The aim of this study will be to carry out a health economic assessment (HEA) of the VIVADOM project as part of the prevention of frailty and/or dependency (by comparing beneficiaries of the complete kit with non-beneficiaries). The comparator will be the fact of not benefiting from the complete kit. In addition, the efficiency of the project in preventing falls and cognitive problems will be studied. We will calculate three incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for these three issues.

The economic model used will be the Markov model. Transition probabilities, average costs and average quality-adjusted life year (QALY) will be calculated for the two groups being compared. The ICER will be obtained by dividing the difference in average costs by the difference in average QALYs. Finally, ICERs will be compared with willingness-to-pay (WTP) to assess the efficiency of the system. Thus, the VIVADOM project will be efficient when these ICERs are lower than the WTP. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be carried out to ensure the robustness of the analysis results.

The HEA of the VIVADOM project has been approved by the research unit of the University of Limoges in France. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences.

Hand-arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities (HABIT-ILE) is an intensive rehabilitation programme for children with cerebral palsy (CP) delivered in a day camp setting recognised to promote the acquisition of specific functional abilities and independence. Currently, during HABIT-ILE camps, families are minimally involved in their child’s motor learning processes. This explains the challenges reported by both families and therapists, including difficulties in reinforcing skills at home, limited transfer to other functional goals and a lack of confidence in parents’ adaptive competence (self-determination and empowerment). Increasing family involvement in intensive motor rehabilitation programmes and the child’s developmental process by reinforcing skills at home could help reduce the parental impact of the child’s disability, enhance family satisfaction and strengthen their resources to support their child’s daily learning during and after the camp.

To address this, we developed the PARTNER programme, which combines HABIT-ILE with a structured home component focused on parent coaching.

We designed a non-inferiority, mixed-methods, multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy at 3 months of the PARTNER programme (35 hours HABIT-ILE+15 hours home programme) with the standard HABIT-ILE programme (50 hours) on the bimanual performance (Assisting Hand Assessment) of children with unilateral CP aged 3–5 years. The secondary aims are to compare the 3-month efficacy of the programmes on occupational performance, functional skills and upper limb activity levels, as well as families’ resources, the parent–child relationship, the quantity and quality of resources available in the home to stimulate the child’s motor development, and parental perceptions of their child’s disability and their child’s abilities (qualitative study). The tertiary aim is to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of care consumption in each group up to 6 months after the end of the programmes.

Target recruitment is 66 children (33 in each group) from 3 centres in France. Outcomes will be evaluated before the interventions, immediately after, at 3 months and up to 6 months for the cost-effectiveness analysis. Families in the PARTNER group will receive specific coaching and extensive support to perform the home programme. The coaching will focus on enhancing their resources.

The study protocol has been reviewed, and ethics approval obtained from the Protection of Persons Committee (PPC) (PPC number: 2024-A01051-46). The results from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations.

NCT06963151.