A qualitative study was conducted in Catalonia (Spain), incorporating the views and opinions of relatives, healthcare professionals and patients on what they considered a ‘good death’. This study aimed to describe barriers, facilitators and unmet needs related to the achievement of a good death.

We recruited adult patients with advanced or chronic conditions, relatives and health and social care professionals involved in end-of-life processes of care, management or strategic planning. All participants took part in a qualitative study. The study was informed by phenomenological, hermeneutical and social constructivist perspectives and included 23 in-depth interviews and three focus group discussions with a total of 31 participants. Fieldwork was conducted between February and April 2022. Data were transcribed and analysed using qualitative thematic content and discourse analysis.

Six main themes were identified, comprising 17 subthemes. Facilitators and barriers related to achieving ‘a good death’ were categorised according to whether they occurred before death or during the dying process. Key facilitators include high-quality palliative care, open communication about death and the ability to choose the place of death. Key barriers included bureaucratic delays, inadequate resources, insufficient professional training and lack of respect for patients’ preferences and wishes.

Our study highlights the need to understand factors that facilitate or hinder the achievement of a good death and the quality of the dying process. Specifically, understanding individual preferences and unmet needs, enhancing communication, increasing awareness, reducing bureaucratic barriers and ensuring adequate resources are essential to support a more dignified end-of-life experience for patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals.

The combination with corticosteroids as immunomodulators has been the subject of debate in different infectious syndromes. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy (the percentage of patients hospitalised with influenza with a status of 3 or higher according to the Hospital Recovery Scale (HRS) on day 7 after the start of treatment) and safety of dexamethasone.

Investigator-initiated multicentre, blinded, randomised placebo-controlled trial with two parallel treatment arms. The study population will consist of adult patients (over 18 years of age) hospitalised with severe influenza. One arm will receive one capsule of 6 mg of dexamethasone for 7 days, and the other arm will receive one capsule of placebo for 7 days of antibiotic treatment for 7 days or longer. Both groups will receive oseltamivir (75 mg/12 hours orally) for 5 days, extendable to 10 days depending on the investigator decision. Randomisation will occur in equal proportion (1:1). Patients with bronchial hyper-responsiveness that requires systemic corticosteroids for more than 24 hours, preinclusion treatment with corticosteroids for more than 24 hours at a dose equal to or higher than 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone (0.2 mg/kg dexamethasone or 1.25 mg/kg prednisone), inability to administer oral oseltamivir, patients with severe comorbidity with a life expectancy of

The study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of Alicante Health Department—Dr. Balmis General University Hospital (LOC-100061146). The results of the main trial and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal

NCT06528444.

Women with recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) often undergo intensive antibiotic exposure, especially with suppressive therapies. Suppressive therapy is recommended for women with three UTIs in the past year or two in the last 6 months. However, the collateral long-term effects of this have been poorly studied.

To assess whether suppressive therapy for recurrent UTIs increases the incidence and severity of future infections compared with episodic UTI treatment.

Retrospective cohort study.

The study was conducted using data from the Information System for Research in Primary Care database, including 5.8 million people in Catalonia. Two groups of women with recurrent UTIs (≥3 episodes/year) were compared: those on suppressive antibiotic therapy for ≥6 months and those treated episodically. Primary outcomes were hospitalisations due to pyelonephritis, septicaemia, COVID-19, influenza, pneumonia and mortality by these infections, over a 100-month follow-up period.

Among 36 170 women, 2898 (8%) were treated with continuous suppressive therapy. Overall, 6.9% of the population experienced severe infections, with a higher incidence in women on suppressive therapy (12.6%) compared with those without (6.4%), with a HR of 1.50 (95% CI 1.33 to 1.68). Pyelonephritis presented the greatest difference (HR, 1.95 (95% CI 1.64 to 2.33)), followed by septicaemia (HR, 1.34 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.59)) and COVID-19 (HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.50)).

Suppressive antibiotic therapy in women with recurrent UTIs is associated with a higher incidence and severity of future infections. Future research should focus on clarifying causal relationships and identifying the potential mechanisms involved.