Conectar
To examine triggers, responses, and outcomes for patient-related violence and/or aggression events during acute hospitalisation.
This was a descriptive observational study undertaken at two healthcare organisations.
Pre-existing data were extracted from organisational incident reports and individual medical records during a retrospective period (1/1/2023 to 30/6/2023) and a prospective period (7/6/2024 to 16/11/2024). Violence and/or aggression events requiring an organisational response that involved patients hospitalised in general ward areas at a metropolitan (Site A) and a regional (Site B) site were included. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
The sample included 100 retrospective cases and 42 prospective cases. The most prevalent causes for hospitalisation related to a medical or mental health condition and dementia. Confusion and irritability were the most common forms of behaviour of concern prior to the event. Physical restraint was utilised more frequently in the prospective period compared with the retrospective period. Chemical restraint was used in approximately half of the cases in both study periods. A form of physical violence was the most prevalent behavioural symptom in both periods, followed by verbal aggression and inability to be re-directed.
Patients with a pre-existing medical condition, confusion and/or dementia are frequently involved in violent and/or aggressive events in ward settings. Physical and chemical restraints are commonly used to manage violence and aggression.
Alternative strategies are needed to manage occupational violence and aggression to minimise the need for physical and/or chemical restraint.
This study addresses a gap in evidence regarding triggers, responses and outcomes for patients exhibiting violence and aggression in ward settings during hospitalisation. Patients with dementia, confusion and irritability frequently exhibit behaviours of concern, exposing healthcare workers to potential physical and psychological harm.
STROBE checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To explore factors affecting research engagement among Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals (NMAHPs) in England by examining perceptions of research capacity at organisational, team and individual levels.
Research engagement strongly correlates with improved care quality. However, NMAHPs face persistent participation barriers compared to medical colleagues, limiting the development of a multi-professional research workforce.
National descriptive cross-sectional study using a validated survey tool.
Data from NMAHPs across England were collected using the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and inferentially; qualitative free-text responses were evaluated thematically.
Perceived capacity was moderate organisationally and in teams. Organisational strengths included promoting evidence-based practice (68.7%) and leadership support (61.6%). Teams offered moderate research opportunities (58.6%) but limited mentorship (47.9%). Individually, participants showed competence in literature review (69.5%) and data collection (63.4%) but required support for funding acquisition (43.8%) and publication (50.0%). Qualitatively, research was a highly valued aspect of professional identity, though participation is severely constrained by structural conditions, including extreme resource pressures, unclear career pathways, and professional inequality.
Despite strong motivation for evidence-based practice, significant structural barriers restrict NMAHP research engagement. Strengthening capacity demands coordinated action across clinical and policy systems, ensuring equitable access to protected time, mentorship, and vital research infrastructure.
Supporting NMAHPs in research enhances evidence-informed decisions and service innovation. Embedding research into everyday clinical work, rather than viewing it as optional, builds a sustainable multi-professional culture.
This survey pinpoints the specific factors most strongly influencing NMAHP research engagement. It provides healthcare leaders actionable insights to build sustainable research infrastructure and inclusive clinical academic pathways.
This study adhered to STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional research.
No patient or public contribution.
by Abebaw Misganaw, Alaye Debas Ayenew, Netsanet Temesgen Ayenew, Enyew Fenta Mengistu, Baye Ashenef, Samrawit Nega Shiferaw, Getamesay Demelash Simegn
BackgroundSurgery and anesthesia can disrupt normal physiological function through surgical stress and residual anesthetic effects, increasing the risk of post-anesthetic complications, known as critical incidents. This study aimed to determine the incidence of critical events in the post-anesthesia care unit at Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.
MethodsAn institution-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1, 2024, to September 30, 2024. The sample size was determined by a single proportion formula using a prevalence of 50% and a 5% margin of error at the 95% confidence interval. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 22 for windows. Analysis was conducted using bivariable and multivariable logistic regression as needed.
ResultOf the 422 patients, 160 (37.9%) experienced one or more critical events, with a total of 214 complications recorded. The most common critical events that occurred in the PACU were cardiovascular-related events (42%) and respiratory & airway related incidents (20%). BMI, duration of anesthesia, intraoperative complications, patient handover, PACU staff training, and ASA physical status were significantly associated with the occurrence of critical events. The odds of critical events were higher among underweight (AOR = 3.71; 95% CI: 1.27–10.79) and overweight patients (AOR = 3.05; 95% CI: 1.28–7.24). Anesthesia duration of 1–2 hours (AOR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.06–3.81) and >2 hours (AOR = 4.11; 95% CI: 1.59–10.66) also increased the risk. Patients with intraoperative complications had higher odds of critical events (AOR = 3.52; 95% CI: 1.88–6.58), as did those without proper handover (AOR = 3.92; 95% CI: 2.11–7.25). Increasing ASA class was associated with higher risk ASA II (AOR = 2.59; 95% CI: 1.11–6.07), ASA III (AOR = 2.86; 95% CI: 1.20–6.86), and ASA IV (AOR = 11.75; 95% CI: 2.76–50.03). Additionally, patients cared for by PACU nurses without prior PACU training were more likely to develop complications (AOR = 3.15; 95% CI: 1.73–5.72).
ConclusionApproximately 38% of patients experienced ≥1 critical event, mainly cardiovascular and respiratory complications. Patients who had intraoperative complications, ASA 2 to ASA 4 status, under/overweight, and those who received anesthesia for a prolonged duration were relatively at higher risk of developing critical events. There was a long time to stay in the PACU for those patients who experienced critical events.
To identify the available records surrounding the deployment of perioperative nurses into differing clinical settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Integrative review methodology.
Quality appraisal of each record was conducted using a modified Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data were extracted and presented based on outlined research objectives.
Six electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched, with relevant peer-reviewed records published after 2019 until February 2025 included to differentiate from other respiratory pandemics.
Ten records were included in the review. Opposing discourse exists between perioperative decision makers and those perioperative nurses who underwent deployment to differing clinical areas surrounding perceptions and experiences of deployment during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Few studies exist exploring experiences of perioperative nurse deployment to a different clinical area during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is vital to develop strategies that enhance the deployment process and ensure effective patient care across various clinical settings when cared for by deployed perioperative nurses.
Further research exploring transferable perioperative nursing skills and its subsequent influence on safe patient care may enhance and inform nurse deployment practices, enriching future staffing protocols in the event of a future pandemic.
PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews guided this review.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To review the evidence on the experiences and perceptions of culturally and linguistically diverse informal carers supporting older adults during transitions from hospital to home, including their interactions with transitional care interventions.
Scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, AMED, PsycINFO, Global Health, Social Work Abstracts, JBI EBP, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest and Informit for studies published between January 2010 and November 2024.
Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Analysis followed the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for Practice and Research recommendations framework.
Seventeen studies involving 1275 carers were included. Carer experiences were summarised into four themes: (1) cultural and communication barriers; (2) role ambiguity and practical challenges; (3) limited involvement in discharge planning and (4) barriers to accessing support and services. Perceptions of transitional care interventions were mixed. While some interventions improved carer preparedness and reduced stress, most lacked cultural tailoring and did not address carers' psychosocial and communication needs.
Culturally and linguistically diverse informal carers face challenges navigating transitional care. While involving them in care planning improves outcomes, implementation remains inconsistent. Emotional support and culturally tailored services are insufficient.
There is a need for culturally and linguistically tailored transitional care programmes that prioritise carer education and communication support. Key areas for improvement include: (1) health literacy and system navigation; (2) involvement in care planning; (3) communication with providers; (4) psychosocial and emotional support and (5) culturally appropriate services. Future research should explore the unique emotional and psychosocial needs of these carers to inform targeted support strategies.
This review follows the PRISMA guideline for reporting.
No patient or public contribution.
The ‘Wound Hygiene Italia’ project was designed to provide expert-driven recommendations for the assessment, management and monitoring of venous leg ulcers, tailored to diverse settings of care (hospital, ambulatory and home care). The recommendations, developed by a multidisciplinary panel, emphasise the implementation of the Wound Hygiene strategy, a systematic approach targeting biofilm as a primary barrier to wound healing. Wound management is structured around four steps: cleansing, debridement, edge refashioning and dressing selection adapted to the wound bed characteristics, care setting and clinical capabilities, embedded in a holistic approach through comprehensive patient assessment and monitoring of overall well-being. The findings highlight the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration, standardised tools and continuous patient monitoring, as assessed by objective metrics, such as wound size measurements and photographic documentation. Effective communication with patients and caregivers is also essential to ensure treatment adherence and foster trust in the care process. This framework integrates evidence-based practices to optimise outcomes and patient quality of life. By addressing both clinical and psychosocial factors, the recommendations promote a holistic, patient-centred approach that underscores the importance of education, structured follow-ups and tailored interventions.
In this final editorial of our group of four, we take up the challenge of thinking about radical reform of doctoral education. We contend that without decisive action, nursing risks losing its capacity to shape the future of healthcare. Therefore we suggest there is a need for radical reform of doctoral education, focusing on three key areas.
Overmedication of off-label use of psychotropic medicines to address behaviours of concern in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities is a major public health concern. Disability support workers (DSWs) play a pivotal role in supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities who are prescribed psychotropic medicines. Therefore, there is an urgent need to train DSWs to help understand the appropriate use of these medicines. This paper describes the protocol of a project that aims to develop such a programme.
A participatory action framework will underscore the programme and follow a Universal Design for Learning approach. It will be a co-production involving all stakeholders, including people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, their families, members of the disability workforce, healthcare professionals and educational designers. The programme will be developed using the following steps: (a) development of a consumer advisory committee and expert panel groups, (b) an online survey of learning needs analysis, (c) a rapid umbrella review of the relevant literature, (d) focus groups involving participants from different parts of Australia, (e) co-design events in four Australian cities, (f) field testing on 6–12 DSWs to determine any practical difficulties of implementing the programme, (g) a feasibility trial involving at least 1200 DSWs using a train-the-trainer model and online resources and (h) a mixed-method process evaluation using interviews of a purposive sample of trainees and online questionnaire survey.
Ethics approval will be sought at each stage of the co-design process. Each step of the project will include an academic language paper and Easy Read report developed. The training programme will be shared across Australia, with DSWs able to complete the project for free. We expect the training will help improve DSWs’ knowledge of appropriate psychotropic medicine prescribing in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, confidence in effectively communicating with health professionals and using non-pharmacological approaches to support behaviours of concern, promote shared decision-making with clients, advocate for psychotropic medicine reviews by healthcare professionals, encourage positive interactions with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families and self-reflection on their own behaviour and attitude can influence their client and behaviours of concern.
To determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), potential prescription omission (PPO), potentially harmful drug–drug interactions (PDDI) and identify associated factors among older Ethiopians.
Systematic review and meta-analysis
We searched PubMed, HINARI, Scopus and Web of Science databases to identify eligible studies published up to 31 October 2025.
Observational studies reported the prevalence of PIP, PIM, PPO and PDDI among older adults from any healthcare settings were screened.
Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The quality and risk of bias of the studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Hoy risk of bias tool, respectively, while the certainty of evidence of outcomes was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation based on Cochrane recommendations. We used a random-effects model for analyses to estimate the pooled prevalence and associated factors. All data analyses were done using Stata V.17 software.
The national prevalence of PIP, PIM, PPO and PDDI was estimated as main outcomes. Variations were estimated based on regions, age groups, outcome evaluation tool, disease type and healthcare setting.
The review included 25 studies (n=5662 participants) for PIP or PIM, 14 studies (n=2706 participants) for PDDI and 6 studies (n=1342 participants) for PPO. The pooled prevalence estimate was 41% (95% CI 33% to 48%), I2=96.87% for PIP, 37% (95% CI 31% to 44%), I2=96.33% for PIM, 55% (95% CI 36% to 73%), I2=99.00% for PDDI and 14% (95% CI 6% to 24%), I2=95.07% for PPO. The majority of the studies have very good quality (very good=13, good=1, satisfactory=11 for PIP and PIM; very good=11, satisfactory=3 for PDDI; very good=6 for PPO) and low risk of bias (low risk=18, moderate risk=7 for PIP and PIM; low risk=12, moderate risk=2 for PDDI and low risk=6 for PPO), while all studies for each outcome have low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analyses revealed significant regional and contextual variations. Polypharmacy was significantly associated with PIP (OR=3.72, 95% CI 2.53 to 5.46, p2=69.56%), PIM (OR=4.20, 95% CI 2.91 to 6.06, p2=57.83%) and PDDI (OR=4.51, 95% CI 3.05 to 6.69, p2=0.00%), while hypertension (OR=2.46, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.36, p2=0.00%) was associated with PIP.
This review found a high prevalence of PIP, PIM, PDDI and PPO among older adults in Ethiopia, with notable heterogeneity across regions. Polypharmacy was associated with PIP, PIM and PDDI, while hypertension showed association with PIP. Despite generally good study quality, the certainty of evidence was low for the included studies due to the cross-sectional design nature, with high heterogeneity. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. This study indicates a high burden of inappropriate medication prescribing and its associated factors, underscoring the importance of further robust studies to clarify prescribing practices and associated factors.
CRD42024556744.
The extent to which the analysis of the state of play of doctoral education and suggested ways forward are seen as being radical is of course dependent on the context within which nursing research programs currently exist. We are aware that no one size fits all contexts, but we are also aware of a critical need to challenge dominant perspectives and practices and work toward a radical repositioning of the nursing PhD. At a time when the narrative of nursing shortages is pervasive, we need to be positioning nursing research and researchers at the heart of the solution. Without a radical reconsideration of how we build sustainable research teams, the opportunity will bypass us. The special issue on doctoral education deliberately set out to be disruptive, to surface critical questions and trigger a conversation that needs to be had. We are open to continuing this conversation.
Hospital falls and associated injuries are a global issue associated with harm and significant costs to individuals and society, especially for older adults. Hospital standards specify the minimum level of care required to optimise patient safety, quality and outcomes. Standards are often used during hospital accreditation. This investigation analysed the content and quality of hospital falls standards across the globe.
Hospital standards were located by searching online databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, MEDLINE), ChatGPT, the grey literature via internet search engines, and websites of accreditation agencies, government agencies, and other relevant organisations. We searched for standards from the 60 largest countries by population plus the 60 countries with the highest gross domestic product (n = 82 after accounting for duplicates). For inclusion, hospital standards had to mention ‘fall/s’. Data were analysed using a deductive framework synthesis and content analysis to identify emergent themes.
Forty-one standards used by at least 72 countries were identified from our search. Sixteen were excluded from detailed analysis because they did not mention falls and 3 could not be retrieved. A total of 22 standards were included in the final detailed analysis. Included standards showed wide variations in content and quality. Seven were assessed as high quality, 12 medium quality, and 3 were deemed to be of low quality. Some lacked details on hospital falls screening, assessment, prevention, and management. Consumer engagement in development, implementation, or evaluation was not mentioned in all standards. Procedures for falls data collection and reporting were seldom documented. Hospital standards infrequently referred readers to contemporary research or clinical practice guidelines.
There are variations in the quality and content of standards on hospital falls. International collaboration is recommended to increase the consistency and validity of hospital falls standards across nations, in order to optimise healthcare outcomes.
The findings of this global analysis of hospital falls standards have the potential to impact falls rates and fall-related injuries in hospital patients by providing data to inform the content, evidence base and use of hospital standards to optimise the safety and quality of care delivery. The findings inform the review, design and implementation of hospital accreditation procedures to improve patient outcomes, patient experiences, and service quality.
To examine practice nurse knowledge, attitudes, and practices about medication abortion in Australia.
Cross-sectional survey.
A national online survey was conducted from July to December 2021. Nurses working in general practice were recruited using convenience sampling. Data collected included demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices in abortion care. Analyses used included descriptive statistics and Poisson regression.
From 489 responses, knowledge about medication abortion, its provision, and efficacy was low. Although many respondents felt it was acceptable to assist in medication abortion, few indicated involvement. Those with advanced qualifications had greater perceived knowledge of abortion counselling. Respondent involvement in medication abortion was more likely if they had worked in general practice for a long time, their primary place of work was outside of general practice, or had advanced nursing qualifications.
Given their role in the community, there is an opportunity to better utilise practice nurses for abortion care. Incorporation of abortion into the nursing curriculum and routine practice, including supportive funding mechanisms for care, is needed.
Low knowledge and a lack of practice nurses providing abortion services adversely impact patient access.
Practice nurse provision of medication abortion has not yet been optimised. While practice nurses reported acceptability to provide abortion care, this could be enhanced with funding, education, and service normalisation. These results will inform policy makers, educators, patients, general practices, and nurses to support patient access to abortion care. Incorporating abortion care into nursing curriculum and practice will support women's access to these services.
CHERRIES guideline.
Professional groups, family planning organisations, industry, and government grant partners supported the study's recruitment.
ACTRN12622000655741
To explore the application of Classic Grounded Theory (GT) methodology in nursing research and critically appraise studies employing Classic GT against the validated framework Guideline for Reporting and Evaluating Grounded Theory (GUREGT) research studies.
Systematic review without meta-analysis
The review followed the PRISMA statement and used the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline for data analysis. The quality of included articles was assessed using the CASP qualitative research appraisal tool, and the GUREGT framework was applied to evaluate adherence to Classic GT guiding principles.
Databases were PUBMED, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health Database (ProQuest).
Twenty-nine studies from 2010 to 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Findings revealed inconsistencies in the reporting of Classic GT methodology in nursing research, with frequent omissions of key methodological elements. The GUREGT tool, while user-friendly and practical, highlights gaps in areas such as identifying the main concern, philosophical positioning, and engagement with the literature. These omissions can compromise methodological rigour, suggesting that further refinement of the GUREGT tool is necessary.
The GUREGT tool provides a promising framework for improving the reporting and evaluation of Classic GT studies. However, its current version requires enhancement to fully address the unique demands of Classic GT and ensure rigorous application and reporting of the methodology. Development of a dedicated reporting guideline tailored to Classic GT is critical for advancing the quality of nursing research and supporting researchers in generating robust, theory-driven insights.
Few studies critically appraise Classic GT methodology in health research. This review highlights the need for dedicated reporting guidelines to support methodological rigour and transparency in Classic GT studies.
This review adhered to EQUATOR reporting guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
To measure patients' views of nurses' communication and interpersonal skills during acute hospitalisation.
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study.
From January to June 2024, a convenience sampling approach was used to recruit patients hospitalised in acute care wards across two healthcare organisations in regional Victoria, Australia. A self-report survey, the Communication Assessment Tool for Nurses, included 15 items that measured patients' opinions about the quality of nurses' communication using a 5-point scale. Data were analysed by descriptive and univariate statistics and logistic regression.
The sample included 204 participants. Higher ratings were found for respectful care: ‘Treated me with respect’ and ‘Showed care and concern’. Lower ratings largely related to shared decision-making: ‘Encouraged me to ask questions’, ‘Informed me about my plan of care’, ‘Involved me in decisions as much as I wanted’ and ‘Showed interest in my ideas about my health’. Logistic regression revealed lower ratings for the quality of nurses' communication based on longer hospital stay for items related to greetings and shared decision-making.
Whilst this study found that patients perceive a high quality of respectful nursing care, the findings underscore the need for communication skills training to enhance shared decision-making by nurses. Consideration is needed regarding how nurses are prepared to engage in shared decision-making with patients during acute hospitalisation, particularly for longer hospital stays.
This study addresses a gap in evidence regarding patients' perceptions about the quality of nurses' communication during acute hospitalisation in the Australian context. Whilst they perceive that nurses communicate in a respectful and caring manner, opportunities for shared decision-making may not be capitalised on. Hospital managers and nurse academics should develop interventions to address essential communication skills.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
by Carolyn Tran, Debbie Kane, Dale Rajacich, Kathryn Lafreniere, Caroline Hamm
As cancer survival rates increase in Canada, a growing number of working-age individuals face challenges returning to work after treatment. This study examines the experiences of Canadian cancer survivors who remained in or returned to the workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were cancer survivors aged 25−62 who had been employed prior to their diagnosis. They completed a brief online survey about their return-to-work (RTW) experiences and were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview. Seven participants took part in the interviews, which were transcribed and analyzed through inductive thematic analysis. Four overarching themes emerged: (1) The Perfect Storm of Systemic Challenges, highlighting healthcare barriers exacerbated by the pandemic; (2) You Are Not Alone, emphasizing the importance of social support in mitigating isolation; (3) One Size Does Not Fit All – Individual Journeys, reflecting the need for flexible workplace accommodations and patient self-advocacy; and (4) Creating a “New Normal,” illustrating how survivors reassessed priorities, work identities, and personal well-being. Participants described delayed treatments, lack of fertility options, and limited support during appointments due to pandemic restrictions. Workplace accommodations varied, with some survivors feeling supported while others faced inflexibility. Findings emphasized the need for improved healthcare responsiveness, personalized RTW accommodations, and improved employer training to support cancer survivors. The study also reveals how the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing systemic gaps, underscoring the importance of preparing healthcare and employment systems to better support vulnerable populations during times of crisis.Diagnostic errors in primary care are common, particularly in the interpretation and follow-up of abnormal haemoglobin (Hgb) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) results. These errors frequently result in missed or delayed diagnoses of serious conditions such as anaemia and chronic kidney disease. This protocol describes a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate a novel, evidence-based, team-based intervention aimed at improving diagnostic safety and efficiency.
The study will be conducted across 12 University of Texas Physicians (UTPs) primary care clinics in Houston, Texas, USA. Adult patients (≥18 years) with newly identified abnormal Hgb or eGFR results will be eligible for inclusion. The intervention integrates automated tracking of abnormal laboratory results, nurse navigators to support patient follow-up and engagement, and clinical pathologists to provide diagnostic guidance to primary care providers. The primary outcome is diagnostic safety, defined as the proportion of patients who receive a correct diagnosis within 6 months. Secondary outcomes include diagnostic efficiency, appropriate test utilisation, cost-effectiveness, patient activation and implementation metrics such as acceptability, fidelity and sustainability. The study will also explore barriers and facilitators to successful implementation using mixed-methods evaluation.
This trial has been approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, and findings will be reported to UTP leadership to inform potential system-wide implementation.
FreshRSS 