Public involvement in mental health research enhances research quality. The use of citizen science methods in mental health research has been described as a conclusion of a movement towards increased public involvement; however, this field is in its early stages of development. Our objective was to create a theory of change (ToC) for how citizen science can be used to enhance mental health research quality.

Iterative consultation with the stakeholders of an existing citizen mental health science study, that is, change for citizen science to achieve co-production at scale (C-STACS: https://www.researchintorecovery.com/research/c-stacs/)

We co-developed a ToC through an iterative consultation with C-STACS stakeholders who were (a) representatives of mental health community organisations (n=10), individuals with public involvement experience (n=2) and researchers (n=5). In keeping with established ToC practice, entities were identified, including long-term impacts, outcomes needed to create an impact, stakeholder assumptions and indicators for tracking progress.

A desired primary long-term impact of greater co-production of research was identified between researchers and members of the public, which would create a secondary impact of enhancing public capacity to engage in citizen mental health science. We proposed long-term outcomes needed to enable this impact: (1) greater co-production of research objectives and pathways between researcher and the public, (2) greater embedment of citizen mental health science into funder processes (eg, the creation of specific funding calls for citizen mental health science proposals, (3) greater clarity on the boundaries between citizen science and other participatory approaches (eg, so that there is not loss of impact due to conceptual confusion between these, (4) increased knowledge around effective frameworks to enable mass public participation and (5) greater availability of technology platforms, enabling safe and accessible engagement with citizen mental health science projects.

The proposed ToC is grounded in the C-STACS project, but intended to be broadly applicable. It allows the continued formation of a community of practice around citizen mental health science and should be reviewed, as greater knowledge is developed on how citizen mental health science creates change.

Cervical cancer remains a significant global health concern and is the fourth most prevalent cancer among women. In South Africa, it is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women aged 15–44 years. The disease is typically preceded by persistent high-risk HPV infection, leading to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and eventually cancer. Currently, in South Africa, management primarily involves excision, particularly through large loop excision of the transformation zone, which has associated risks and limitations. Thermal ablation is an alternative cost-effective treatment method, providing a straightforward approach to treatment, particularly advantageous in environments characterised by limited resources. The study aims to assess the efficacy, safety and patient experience of thermal ablation, providing valuable data for potential integration into South Africa’s cervical cancer prevention policies.

Randomised controlled trial in which 420 women living with HIV aged 30–60 years will be recruited from the Colposcopy Clinic at Tygerberg Hospital and will be followed up for a period of two years. The primary study endpoint is a test of cure that will be assessed by HPV genotyping, cervical cytology and histology at six month intervals. Other endpoints include the occurrence of adverse events.

The study protocol has been approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (Ethics Reference No: M20/11/035) and by the Western Cape Department of Health and Wellness via the National Health Research Database (WC_202109_016). All study procedures comply with the Declaration of Helsinki, South African Good Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Medical Research Council’s ethical guidelines. Trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, national and international conference presentations and professional associations. A lay summary will be shared with the Community Advisory Board to guide community-level dissemination.

Pan African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR202504820339039.

Diagnosis in the early stages of dementia can lead to successful delay in associated cognitive decline. However, up to 76% of Australians diagnosed with dementia have already advanced beyond the early stage of disease. BrainTrack is an evidence-based mobile application (app) designed in Australia to promote brain health self-awareness, self-determination to promote help-seeking and, ultimately, a timelier dementia diagnosis. We will evaluate user experience, implementation and social return-on-investment outcomes of BrainTrack and will report dementia-related concerns, dementia literacy, knowledge, stigma and motivation for behaviour change and explore their associations with demographic characteristics.

A multimethods, concurrent, two-study observational design will be used. Study 1 will evaluate BrainTrack user experience and implementation outcomes, changes in users’ dementia literacy, dementia knowledge, perceptions of dementia-related stigma and help-seeking at five time points (baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). People residing in all states and territories of Australia will be recruited to the study via the BrainTrack app. Data collection will occur online and through teleconferencing. Approximately 1000 participants will complete all five surveys. Google Analytics data will measure adoption. App usage data will identify app use patterns. A sample of continuing app users (~n=80) and those who cease app use within 6 months (~n=20) will be interviewed to obtain in-depth information about their app use and help-seeking experience. Dementia Australia Helpline data will quantify help-seeking calls triggered by BrainTrack use. In Study 1, longitudinal outcomes will be analysed using mixed models. The economic and social value of BrainTrack will be assessed using social return on investment analysis. In Study 2, general practitioners (~n=20) currently practising in Australia will participate in semi-structured interviews conducted via online teleconferencing. Interviews will elicit perceptions of the usefulness of BrainTrack for initiating and facilitating discussions with patients about cognition and dementia. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically, followed by deductive analysis guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework.

This study has received Human Research Ethics Committee approval from Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (Study 1: HREC Reference Number 2022–220) and Deakin University Human Ethics Advisory Group, Faculty of Health (Study 2: Reference Number 202_2022). Informed consent will be obtained prior to participation, either verbally for interviews or online for surveys. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to key stakeholders.