Maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality are a global concern. Understanding the epidemiology of post-discharge complications could identify opportunities for interventions. We aimed to quantify mortality, care-seeking events and readmission among mothers and newborns in Uganda following facility-based delivery.

This prospective observational study (Apr 2022-Sep 2023) enrolled women presenting for delivery at two regional referral hospitals in Uganda. Data were collected during admission and 6 weeks after delivery by phone.

Overall, 7131 women delivered 7359 newborns, of whom 7129 (99%) women and 6968 (94%) newborns were discharged alive. The newborn mortality rate was 2.7% and 32% of deaths occurred post-discharge. Following discharge, 230 (3%) women and 287 (4%) newborns were readmitted. Suspected sepsis and infections were the most common reasons for readmission among mothers (62.2%) and newborns (89.9%). Caesarean delivery (OR:2·26 (1·75-2·93)) and perinatal death (OR:3·18 (2·09-4·69)) were associated with post-discharge maternal readmission. Both maternal and newborn readmission were associated with household food insecurity during pregnancy (maternal OR:1·56 (1·15-2·08); newborn OR: 1·73 (1·31-2·25)). Newborn resuscitation with oxygen was associated with maternal readmission (OR:2.24 (1.24–3·78)), newborn readmission (OR: 2·74 (1·54-4·56)) and newborn death (OR: 4·01 (1·73-8·21)). Although >99% of women had ≥1 antenatal care visit, only 511 (7%) had ≥1 routine postnatal care visit. There were no routine postnatal care visits among 211 (91·7%) readmitted mothers, 276 (96·2%) newborns and 57 (91·9%) newborns who died.

Post-discharge complications occur in a context of low routine postnatal care use. Risk-informed discharge planning, postnatal care and health education strategies may improve outcomes in mothers, newborns and their families.

Visual impairment is reported to affect 40%–50% of children with cerebral palsy (CP). Vision difficulties in the context of rehabilitation are often under-recognised, under-treated and therefore under-studied, pointing to an urgent need for the development of evidence-based vision interventions for infants and toddlers with cerebral vision impairment (CVI). We present the protocol of a multisite pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an early vision-awareness and parent-directed environmental enrichment programme for infants with or at risk of CP under 7 months corrected age (CA) with vision impairment.

The main objective is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Vision Intervention for Seeing Impaired Babies: Learning through Enrichment (VISIBLE) intervention. We will estimate the preliminary effects of the programme on infants’ visual functions and early development, as compared with standard community-based care (SCC).

A two-group RCT will be conducted. Infants at 3–6 months at entry, with severe visual impairment and at high risk of CP, will be enrolled and randomised (n=16 per group) to receive the VISIBLE intervention compared to SCC. Randomisation will be completed through an independent automated process (Research Electronic Data Capture). VISIBLE intervention will be delivered by a therapist through home visits (90–120 min) once every 2 weeks. Completion of 10 visits (80% of the intervention target dose) within 6 months is required for adherence to the VISIBLE trial. Outcome will be assessed at 12 months CA. Visual function will be evaluated with the Infant Battery for Vision, motor outcomes with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition. Developmental quotients, infant quality of life, parent well-being and parent-infant relationship will be also monitored through standardised tools.

The enrolling sites have historically demonstrated rapid and effective translation of successful evidence-based interventions into routine clinical practice, as well as the dissemination of the findings through local, national and international scientific meetings.

ACTRN12618000932268.

To examine how socioeconomic deprivation influences referral pathways to emergency departments (EDs) and to assess how these pathways affect subsequent hospital outcomes.

Retrospective observational study.

Emergency department of a large teaching hospital in the East of England, providing secondary and tertiary care.

482 787 ED attendances by patients aged 16 years and over, recorded between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients were assigned Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) deciles based on residential postcode.

Referral source (general practitioner (GP), National Health Service (NHS) 111, ambulance, self-referral, other), total ED time, 4-hour breach, hospital admission and unplanned return within 72 hours.

Substantial socioeconomic inequalities were observed in referral pathways. Patients from the most deprived areas were significantly less likely to be referred by a GP (4.7%) than those from the least deprived areas (14.7%) and more likely to arrive via ambulance (32% vs 24%). These differences persisted after adjusting for demographic, clinical and contextual variables. Ambulance referrals showed the longest ED stays, ranging from 347 to 351 min across IMD deciles (overall 95% CI 343 to 363) and the highest probability of 4-hour breaches (51%; 95% CI 50% to 53%). Self-referrals had the greatest rates of unplanned returns within 7 days (up to 7.1%; 95% CI 5.5% to 8.7%). In contrast, NHS 111 and GP referrals were associated with shorter stays, lower breach rates and fewer reattendances. Minimal variation in outcomes was observed across deprivation levels once referral source was accounted for.

Inequalities in how patients access emergency care, particularly reduced GP and NHS 111 referrals among more deprived groups, appear to underpin disparities in ED outcomes. Referral source captures important clinical and system-level factors that influence patient experience and resource use. Interventions to improve equitable access to structured referral pathways, particularly in more deprived areas, may enhance both the efficiency and fairness of emergency care delivery. Further research using national data is needed to assess broader policy implications and economic costs associated with differential access.