To identify the barriers and facilitators towards deceased organ donation among Pakistanis living globally.

Systematic review using narrative synthesis.

CINAHL, Medline with Full Text, Global Health and PsycINFO via EBSCO; Scopus via Elsevier; Web of Science via Clarivate; and PubMed through the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health were searched between 1 January 1995 and 31 July 2024 and limited to English.

We included qualitative and cross-sectional studies involving Pakistani participants aged 18 years and above, conducted both within Pakistan and internationally across settings such as universities, religious venues, hospitals and workplaces.

Four independent reviewers were involved in screening, quality assessment and data extraction. A narrative synthesis method was employed to synthesise and integrate the data from qualitative and cross-sectional studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.

Out of 11 944 studies retrieved, 26 studies were included in the current review. Based on the narrative synthesis, the findings are presented under the following five themes: (1) knowledge of deceased organ donation, (2) willingness towards deceased organ donation, (3) collective decision-making overriding individual’s preferences, (4) religious uncertainty and its impact on deceased organ donation and (5) trust and the healthcare systems.

This review shows that decisions about deceased organ donation are shaped by family dynamics, religious beliefs and trust in healthcare. More diverse research is needed to uncover new gaps and improve donor registration and consent rates in Pakistan. A whole-systems approach, considering families, religion and trust, is essential for effective strategies.

CRD42022346343.

Cognitive impairment is considered a challenge in medication management for both the affected patient as well as their caregiver. Numerous studies have investigated interventions aiming to improve medication therapy safety in this population; however, there is insufficient knowledge on interventions which support patients and caregivers effectively. The aim of this systematic review is to (1) identify interventions to improve medication therapy safety in older patients with cognitive impairment, and (2) to evaluate their effectiveness.

We will conduct a systematic review of literature with participatory elements of public involvement in every step of the process. Five literature databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL) will be screened to identify interventions to improve medication therapy safety in older (≥65 years of age) adults with cognitive impairment. To support methodology and evidence synthesis, we will conduct expert panel discussions as well as focus group discussions of caregivers and healthcare professionals. Study selection, data extraction and bias assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers. For data synthesis, studies will be organised by setting (eg, community setting, hospital setting, nursing home setting).

The responsible Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg granted approval for the public involvement strategies in this project (S-562/2024). Results will be presented by publication in an academic journal and at scientific conferences.

CRD42024623352.

Pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) frequently accompanies rotator cuff tears, with tenotomy and tenodesis often being used to address this pathology. While meta-analyses report comparable functional outcomes between these techniques, tenotomy is linked to higher rates of Popeye deformity, whereas tenodesis is more technically demanding and might involve extra material. A novel self-locking tenodesis technique aims to reduce deformity risk while being a simpler alternative to the conventional tenodesis procedure; however, comparative evidence is currently limited.

This single-centre, patient-blinded randomised controlled trial will enrol 100 patients aged ≥40 years with reparable, non-traumatic, full-thickness supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus and/or subscapularis tendon tears undergoing arthroscopic repair from January 2025 until January 2027. Key exclusion criteria include massive or irreparable tears, advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis and prior shoulder surgery. Participants will be randomised to either 360 double lasso loop tenodesis or self-locking tenodesis. The primary outcome is the Constant score at 1 year, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 10 points. Secondary outcomes include American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, simple shoulder value score, LHB score, cosmetic appearance, pain scores and radiographic tendon migration. Statistical non-inferiority will be assessed using a one-sided t-test.

The study protocol received approval from the National Ethical Review Board in France (CPP Sud-Est V) and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT06774820.

In the Netherlands, approximately 2200 major amputations of the lower extremities are performed each year, the majority in vascular patients. Around 61% of these patients will develop postamputation pain (PAP). PAP is a severe, lifelong, disabling condition profoundly affecting quality of life. During amputations, the common practice is to cut the nerves without employing nerve-surgical techniques to prevent chronic pain due to neuroma formation. In recent years, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has been the most frequently studied technique for treating PAP, inhibiting neuroma formation by rerouting the cut mixed nerve to a functional motor nerve. We hypothesise that a primary TMR procedure during major lower limb amputations will result in a lower prevalence of PAP.

We propose a national, multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial comparing TMR with traction neurectomy in major amputations of the lower extremities in patients with vascular disease. 203 patients will be recruited with an indication for a transfemoral to transtibial amputation as a primary or secondary sequela of vascular disease. The subjects are randomly assigned to the TMR group or the traction neurectomy group. PAP will be evaluated 1 year postoperatively as the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, mobility, neuropathic pain, hospital anxiety and depression, cost-effectiveness and complications.

This study has been reviewed and approved by the local ethical review body, ‘The Medical Ethics Committee Leiden The Hague Delft’, under the reference: P24.073 on 28 November 2024. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

NCT06719245. Dutch trial registry: NL87196.058.24