FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
Hoy — Diciembre 16th 2025Tus fuentes RSS

Barriers and facilitators of deceased organ donation among Pakistanis living globally: a systematic review

Por: Vincent · B. P. · Ghaffar · Z. · Al-Abdulghani · A. · Taaruf · I. · Idam · G. · Randhawa · G.
Objective

To identify the barriers and facilitators towards deceased organ donation among Pakistanis living globally.

Design

Systematic review using narrative synthesis.

Data sources

CINAHL, Medline with Full Text, Global Health and PsycINFO via EBSCO; Scopus via Elsevier; Web of Science via Clarivate; and PubMed through the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health were searched between 1 January 1995 and 31 July 2024 and limited to English.

Eligibility criteria

We included qualitative and cross-sectional studies involving Pakistani participants aged 18 years and above, conducted both within Pakistan and internationally across settings such as universities, religious venues, hospitals and workplaces.

Data extraction and synthesis

Four independent reviewers were involved in screening, quality assessment and data extraction. A narrative synthesis method was employed to synthesise and integrate the data from qualitative and cross-sectional studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.

Results

Out of 11 944 studies retrieved, 26 studies were included in the current review. Based on the narrative synthesis, the findings are presented under the following five themes: (1) knowledge of deceased organ donation, (2) willingness towards deceased organ donation, (3) collective decision-making overriding individual’s preferences, (4) religious uncertainty and its impact on deceased organ donation and (5) trust and the healthcare systems.

Conclusion

This review shows that decisions about deceased organ donation are shaped by family dynamics, religious beliefs and trust in healthcare. More diverse research is needed to uncover new gaps and improve donor registration and consent rates in Pakistan. A whole-systems approach, considering families, religion and trust, is essential for effective strategies.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42022346343.

AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Barriers and facilitators to accessing services for neurodevelopmental disorders among the carers of individuals from Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups in the UK: a scoping review

Por: Vincent · B. P. · Maryam · Z. · Ali · N. · Bushnell · M. · Elliott · E. · Randhawa · G.
Objective

To identify the barriers and facilitators to accessing services for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) among the carers of individuals from Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups in the UK.

Design

A scoping review.

Data sources

Seven databases: PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE Full Text, APA PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies up to the end of March 2025. Titles and abstracts and, where appropriate, full-text articles were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently screened the 6454 studies, with data extraction carried out by two reviewers. A narrative synthesis of the findings was undertaken.

Findings

A total of 15 studies were included in the review, the majority of which were qualitative (n=9; 60%). Among the Black, Asian and minority ethnic populations represented, South Asians comprised the predominant group. The review underscores that the barriers faced by Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities are multifactorial, which includes: (1) language and communication barriers, (2) cultural and religious influences, (3) stigma, (4) formal and informal support systems and (5) experience with healthcare services.

Conclusion

Access to neurodevelopmental care for carers from Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups in the UK is shaped by complex, multifactorial barriers. These communities are not homogeneous, and evidence gaps make it unclear whether challenges are shared or distinct. Greater understanding is needed to inform culturally appropriate, evidence-based policy and practice. Further research is essential to address disparities and improve equitable access across all groups.

❌