Little research has been done on post-COVID symptoms at 24 months postinfection and on the association these may have on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

We assessed the prevalence and severity of post-COVID symptoms and quantified EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), self-perceived health question (EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) and health utility scores (HUS) up to 24 months follow-up.

The longitudinal multiple cohort CORona Follow-Up (CORFU) study combines seven COVID-19 patient cohorts and a survey among the general public. The participants received questionnaires on several time points. Participants were stratified by: without a known SARS-CoV-2 infection (control group), proven SARS-CoV-2 infection but non-hospitalised, proven SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised to the ward, and proven SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised to the intensive care unit (ICU).

In this study, data of seven COVID-19 patient cohorts and a survey among the general public are included.

Former COVID-19 patients and controls participated in this cohort study.

Former COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 controls were sent questionnaires on symptoms associated with post-COVID condition. The CORFU questionnaire included 14 symptom questions on post-COVID condition using a five-level Likert-scale format. Furthermore, HRQOL was quantified using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire: EQ-VAS and the EQ-5D-5L utility score. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire includes five domains that are scored on a five-point Likert scale: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

A total of 901 participants (and 434 controls) responded at 24 months follow-up. In all former COVID-19 patients, the presence of post-COVID condition at 24 months was observed in 62 (42.5%, 95% CI 34.3% to 50.9%) of the non-hospitalised patients, 333 (65.0%, 95% CI 60.7% to 69.2%) of the hospitalised ward patients and 156 (63.2%, 95% CI 56.8% to 69.2%) of the ICU patients, respectively (p

Many former COVID-19 patients experience post-COVID symptoms at 24 months follow-up, with the highest prevalence in hospitalised participants. Also, former patients reported a lower HRQOL.

The CORFU study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT05240742).

The healthcare sector has significant environmental impacts, particularly through greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing its climate footprint is therefore essential for achieving political goals such as net-zero and climate-friendly healthcare. While health economic evaluation (HEE) methods compare the costs and consequences of two or more interventions, these analyses rarely consider climate impacts. Some studies have begun to determine climate impacts parallel to or integrated into HEEs. Life cycle assessment (LCA) could be used to integrate climate impacts by considering these results as effects or monetised climate footprints. However, a reporting standard is needed for using these climate-extended economic evaluations in evidence-based decision-making. This protocol describes using an online Delphi process to incorporate climate impacts into the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standard (CHEERS), called CHEERS Climate Extension (CHEERS ClimatE).

The development of CHEERS ClimatE will proceed through five key stages. First, the preliminary steering group develops in consultation with an advisory board a proposal for the CHEERS ClimatE reporting standard based on a transparency checklist that combines three standards for carbon footprint calculations into the CHEERS framework. The mapping was complemented by reviewing studies that incorporate climate impacts in HEE. Second, for the Delphi process, international experts in HEE and LCA with at least one year of academic experience will be invited to participate in an online pre-survey. We aim to recruit at least 40 participants. Expecting various drop-outs, we aim to reach a consensus with at least 20 participants per Delphi round. Third, an expected three-round Delphi process will be conducted to validate and refine the proposed elements. Participants will rate each item using a 9-point Likert scale and will have the opportunity to comment on each item and propose new items. Consensus is defined with the target of a 70% agreement. Unless consensus is reached, a moderated video conference may be held as a fourth round. Fourth, following other CHEERS extensions, the consented checklist will be piloted using thematically relevant case studies. While substantial changes are not anticipated, minor revisions to individual items may be considered and ratified by the steering group and advisory board. The fifth stage is the publication of the final checklist.

This study has been approved by the ethics committee of the University of Bremen (2024–25). The findings of the Delphi study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

Childhood cancer accounts for a significant proportion of global childhood mortality, especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Unlike many adult malignancies, primary prevention of childhood cancers is not possible. Improving survival requires a two-pronged strategy: earlier diagnosis and effective treatment. Our study aims to establish the feasibility, clinical and implementation effectiveness of an adapted early warning signs and symptoms (EWSS) intervention in Cameroon and Kenya. It will equip healthcare workers, Ministry of Health (MOH) representatives and National Cancer Institute leaders with evidence-informed guidance on implementing context-adapted interventions to improve the early detection and referral of childhood cancers in these countries.

The study is a quasi-experimental, hybrid type 2 implementation effectiveness study based on a Ghanaian adaptation of the ‘Saint Siluan’ EWSS campaign. Our protocol proposes context-specific adaptation and evidence-based implementation of the EWSS intervention through iterative engagement with country-level implementation teams to train healthcare workers and improve referral pathways for earlier childhood cancer diagnoses in each study country. Training effectiveness will be measured through pretraining and post-training tests of knowledge and application, as well as training satisfaction surveys. Clinical effectiveness will be assessed by using a REDCap database to track the number of newly diagnosed childhood cancer cases in the study regions and counties, healthcare timelines and paths to diagnosis, and the stage and proportion of metastatic disease at diagnosis. Implementation effectiveness will be evaluated through interviews with senior and mid-level health system partners and clinicians, tracking fidelity to the implementation process as laid out in The Implementation Roadmap Workbook, and analysis of meeting minutes from monthly local implementation team meetings.

This study has received ethical approval from The Hospital for Sick Children (REB # 1000080092) and all participating sites. We have received National Ethical Clearance from the Cameroon Ethical Board (#1699) and Regional Administrative Authorizations from our piloting regions (Centre and West). We have also received ethical clearance from Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) (ERB# KNH-ERC/RR/955) and our National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation in Kenya licence from the counties we are piloting in Kenya. As clinical data will be collected from existing health registries and patient charts, patient consent will not be required; however, we will obtain consent from all members of the leadership implementation teams and operational implementation teams for their participation in the implementation meetings and from all individuals participating in the semistructured interviews. We will disseminate findings to build awareness and share findings among various target audiences: (1) key county and regional parties (eg, clinical societies, advocacy groups, country MOHs and regional bodies such as the East African Community, Economic Community of West African States); (2) international bodies such as the WHO; and (3) the academic community.

Amoxicillin is recommended for children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM). However, some trials have shown no difference in amoxicillin for nutritional recovery in children with SAM compared with placebo. In addition, amoxicillin treatment requires two times per day dosing for 7 days, which may influence adherence. Azithromycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that can be provided as a single dose and has reduced mortality in children aged 1–59 months when provided by mass drug administration. The AMOUR trial is designed to assess amoxicillin, azithromycin and placebo as part of outpatient treatment of uncomplicated SAM.

This double-masked randomised controlled trial will enrol 3000 children over 3 years in an individually randomised 1:1:1 allocation to azithromycin, amoxicillin or placebo arms and follow them for 12 months. Children eligible to enrol in the study will be aged 6–59 months and have uncomplicated non-oedematous SAM as defined by weight-for-height Z-score

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Francisco (Protocol 23–39411) and the Comité d’Ethique pour la Recherche en Santé in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso (Protocol 2024-01-08). The results of this study will be disseminated to the Ministry of Health, community stakeholders and via peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences.

NCT06010719.