Conectar
by Vu Nhi Ha, Le Chi Cao, Tran Hai Dang, Dao Thi Huyen, Nguyen Tien Dung, Le Huu Song, Nguyen Linh Toan, Truong Nhat My, Thirumalaisamy P. Velavan
BackgroundHepatitis E virus (HEV) causes sporadic outbreaks worldwide, with zoonotic and waterborne genotypes contributing to infections. In Vietnam, HEV genotypes 3 and 4 circulate among humans and swine, but data from remote, ethnic minority populations remain limited.
MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 272 ethnic minority students at Thai Nguyen University of Medicine and Pharmacy (TUMP) to determine HEV infection markers and associated risk factors. Anti-HEV IgM and IgG were tested in serum samples using Wantai ELISA kits, and HEV RNA was detected by nested PCR targeting the ORF1 region. Demographic and exposure data were collected via structured questionnaires. Statistical analyses were performed using binary logistic regression.
ResultsOne participant (0.37%) tested positive for anti-HEV IgM, and 69 (25%) were positive for anti-HEV IgG, while HEV RNA was undetectable. HEV-IgG seroprevalence increased significantly with age (p = 0.004) but showed no sex-related differences. Consumption of tap or mixed water sources (p = 0.043) and raw or undercooked pork liver (p = 0.018) were significantly associated with HEV-IgG positivity. Multivariate analysis confirmed these factors as independent predictors of prior HEV exposure (adjusted OR = 1.6 and 4.8, respectively).
ConclusionsA moderate HEV seroprevalence among ethnic minorities indicates substantial prior exposure in northern Vietnam. Strengthening water sanitation, food safety awareness, and routine HEV surveillance is recommended to mitigate infection risk in vulnerable communities.
Skin-to-Skin Contact or Kangaroo Mother Care is an evidence-based intervention proven to enhance breastfeeding rates, improve cardiorespiratory stability and promote neurodevelopment in neonates. While established as a standard of care for stable term infants and increasingly recognised for preterm infants, the implementation of sustained skin-to-skin contact faces significant systemic and clinical challenges, particularly within the intensive care environment. This editorial argues that the focus must shift from when skin-to-skin contact is permitted to how sustained skin-to-skin contact can be universally integrated as a non-negotiable core practice, even for extremely preterm infants. Addressing practical barriers, such as staff training, equipment design, parental support and perceived clinical instability, is essential to realise the full potential of sustained skin-to-skin contact to optimise neurodevelopmental and physiological outcomes for all neonates, closing the gap between compelling evidence and inconsistent global practice.
The aim in this human trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of polygalacturonic–caprylic acid (PG–CAP) ointment to MediHoney in chronic wounds at three international medical centres. In this prospective open-label study, patients with chronic full-thickness wounds were randomised to daily treatment with PG–CAP ointment or MediHoney. Assessments were obtained weekly for 6 weeks. The validated Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score was used to track healing. Efficacies were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Twenty-six patients with chronic wounds were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups; however, the history of diabetes mellitus was higher in the PG–CAP group (p = 0.011). All 13 PG–CAP patients showed improvement (100%), compared to only 69% of the 13 MediHoney patients (p = 0.023). Half of the failures in the MediHoney arm were associated with death (15%). No failures, adverse events or deaths occurred in the PG–CAP arm. PG–CAP wound ointment is a novel combination of two plant-based compounds that pose minimal risk of promoting antimicrobial resistance, was highly effective for eradicating wound-pathogen biofilms in vitro and promoted chronic wound healing in vivo with minimal inflammatory reactions. Our findings support PG–CAP as safe, noninferior and possibly more effective than MediHoney in healing chronic contaminated wounds.
by Viet Anh Nguyen, Van Hung Nguyen, Thi Quynh Trang Vuong, Quoc Thanh Truong, Thi Trang Nguyen
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as diagnostic copilots in digital pathology, but whether the newest reasoning-augmented architectures provide measurable benefits over earlier versions is unknown. We compared OpenAI’s o3 model, which uses an iterative planning loop, with the baseline GPT-4o on 459 oral and maxillofacial (OMF) cases drawn from standard textbooks. Each case consisted of two to five high-resolution haematoxylin-and-eosin micrographs, and both models were queried in zero-shot mode with an identical prompt requesting a single diagnosis and supporting microscopic features. Overall, o3 correctly classified 31.6% of cases, significantly surpassing GPT-4o at 18.7% (Δ = 12.9%, PTo evaluate the accuracy of the arterial oxygen partial pressure/inspired oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ratio in predicting mortality among acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients in Vietnam.
A retrospective observational study.
A central hospital in Vietnam.
Adult patients diagnosed with ARDS based on the Berlin definition and admitted to Bach Mai Hospital between August 2015 and August 2023. ARDS severity was converted from descriptive categories to the Berlin score, ranging from 1 (PaO2/FiO2>300 mm Hg) to 4 (PaO2/FiO2≤100 mm Hg).
All-cause hospital mortality.
Of 345 patients, 67.5% were male, and the median age was 55.0 years (IQR: 39.0–66.0). Hospital mortality was 61.2% (211/345). On the first day of admission, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC): 0.585 (95% CI 0.522 to 0.649)) showed limited predictive ability for hospital mortality. Incorporating the PaO2/FiO2 ratio into the Berlin score did not substantially improve accuracy (AUROC: 0.578 (95% CI 0.516 to 0.641)). Both measures were less accurate than Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (AUROC: 0.650 (95% CI 0.590 to 0.711)), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) (AUROC: 0.685 (95% CI 0.628 to 0.742)) and Confusion, Urea >7 mmol/L (20 mg/dL), Respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min, Blood pressure (systolic 2/FiO2 values (adjusted OR, AOR: 0.988 (95% CI 0.979 to 0.996)) were independently associated with lower mortality risk, while higher Berlin (AOR: 2.477 (95% CI 1.190 to 5.156)), SOFA (AOR: 1.278 (95% CI 1.102 to 1.482)), APACHE II (AOR: 1.236 (95% CI 1.108 to 1.379)) and CURB-65 (AOR: 7.142 (95% CI 2.581 to 19.763)) scores were associated with increased mortality risk.
In this study of ARDS patients in Vietnam, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio demonstrated limited discriminatory ability for hospital mortality, and incorporating it into the Berlin score did not meaningfully improve performance. While less accurate than SOFA, APACHE II and CURB-65 scores, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and Berlin score remained independently associated with mortality risk. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, given the retrospective design, single-centre setting and potential selection bias; further validation in larger, multicentre studies is warranted.
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research has gained prominence, with patients and public actively shaping research priorities, study design and knowledge translation. While the benefits and challenges of PPI are well documented, less attention has been given to the complexity of navigating multiple identities as research team members. Often, patients and public, academics and clinicians share many of the same goals and occupy overlapping roles, yet research structures rarely acknowledge or accommodate this fluidity. This commentary explores how shared identities of patients and public, academics and clinicians shape research partnerships, challenging conventional boundaries by questioning whether patients and public can also serve as academics or clinicians and vice versa.
This commentary is written from an interdisciplinary perspective, where insights are synthesised from existing literature, empirical knowledge and lived experience. The authors critically examine the intersection of patient and public, academic and clinician identities and discuss the implications for research partnerships. Recurring points of tension, including questions about the suitability of partnerships and the complexities of identity, are explored. The discussion considers how members of research teams navigate privilege and shared responsibility within collaborative settings.
Although PPI aims to foster inclusivity, research partnerships often confine patients and public, academics and clinicians to rigid titles, overlooking the multidimensional identities of those involved. To advance research, practice and advocacy, it is foundational to embrace one’s authentic self while recognising the full complexity of team members. Every individual brings a unique perspective and lived experience, and together, a research team shares the collective responsibility to produce rigorous, quality research that strengthens the body of evidence.
by My Ha Nguyen, Toan Van Ngo, Linh Gia Vu, Dat Cong Truong, Hai Minh Vu
BackgroundDespite the hazardous nature of rice farming, limited evidence exists regarding farmers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward accident prevention, and no standardized instrument is currently available to measure these dimensions in Vietnam or comparable contexts. This study aimed to develop and validate a psychometrically sound instrument for assessing rice farmers’ KAP related to occupational accident prevention.
MethodsInstrument development and validation were carried out in three stages. First, an initial item pool was generated through an extensive review of existing literature. Second, content validity was established through expert consultation involving professionals in agriculture, occupational health, and public health. Third, a pilot study was conducted with 168 rice farmers in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam, to evaluate the instrument’s psychometric properties.
ResultsExploratory factor analysis identified 20 items across five factors in the knowledge domain, nine items forming a single factor for attitudes, and 17 items grouped into four factors for practices, explaining 85.8%, 43.8%, and 72.3% of the total variance, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis supported these structures, demonstrating satisfactory model fit across domains. The instrument exhibited high internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.894 to 0.969 for knowledge, 0.833 for attitudes, and 0.805 to 0.933 for practices.
ConclusionThe validated instrument provides a reliable and valid measure of rice farmers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning occupational accident prevention. It offers a robust foundation for future research, monitoring, and targeted interventions aimed at improving safety behaviors and reducing injury risks among agricultural workers.
Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures seen in the emergency department in children in the USA. However, no established or standardised guidelines exist for the optimal management of completely displaced fractures in younger children. The proposed multicentre randomised trial will compare functional outcomes between children treated with fracture reduction under sedation versus children treated with simple immobilisation.
Participants aged 4–10 years presenting to the emergency department with 100% dorsally translated metaphyseal fractures of the radius less than 5 cm from the distal radial physis will be recruited for the study. Those patients with open fractures, other ipsilateral arm fractures (excluding ulna), pathologic fractures, bone diseases, or neuromuscular or metabolic conditions will be excluded. Participants who agree to enrol in the trial will be randomly assigned via a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to either sedated reduction or in situ immobilisation. A sample size of 167 participants per arm will provide at least 90% power to detect a difference in the primary outcome of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity computer adaptive test scores of 4 points at 1 year from treatment. Primary analyses will employ a linear mixed model to estimate the treatment effect at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include additional measures of perceived pain, complications, radiographic angulation, satisfaction and additional procedures (revisions, refractures, reductions and reoperations).
Ethical approval was obtained from the following local Institutional Review Boards: Advarra, serving as the single Institutional Review Board, approved the study (Pro00062090) in April 2022. The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, ON, Canada) did not rely on Advarra and received separate approval from their local Research Ethics Board (REB; REB number: 1000079992) on 19 July 2023. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at international conference meetings.
FreshRSS 