Conectar
Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is freely and universally available to babies born in Australia, with nearly 300 000 newborns screened each year. The NBS programme screens for approximately 30 conditions; however, there are hundreds of childhood conditions that could be treated if identified earlier and asymptomatically. Contemporary screening platforms have relied on mass spectrometry-based technologies, limiting surveillance to conditions with validated biomarkers detectable within the neonatal period. Advancements in metabolic techniques and genomics have expanded the range of conditions that could be detected. The NewbornsInSA research study will develop, validate and evaluate a novel multi-omic model of newborn screening, integrating metabolomic and genomic newborn screening as complementary methodologies.
Parents can opt in to additional NBS through NewbornsInSA during pregnancy or shortly after birth. One thousand prospectively recruited families will be offered genomic NBS by whole-genome sequencing, including analysis of a virtual gene panel of over 600 genes, and concurrent metabolomic screening. Clinically actionable pathogenic or likely pathogenic genetic variants will be reported to parents and whole genome sequencing data will be available on request for diagnostic reanalysis, if required later in life.
Acceptability of the NewbornsInSA programme will be evaluated through stakeholder engagement activities with healthcare professionals, members of the public and patient advocacy groups. Family experiences will be assessed using online surveys. The diagnostic yield, accuracy and the costs and consequences of the multi-omic NBS model will be assessed by comparison to standard-of-care NBS.
NewbornsInSA will investigate the acceptability, feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a multi-omic newborn screening model in a prospectively recruited South Australian population. We hypothesise that this approach will increase the number of conditions identified, reduce the time to diagnosis and facilitate earlier care with better outcomes for newborns with genetic conditions.
This research study has been ethically approved by the Women’s and Children’s Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/HRE00258 and 2023/HRE00236). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conferences.
To report on the unique perspectives of senior nursing leaders on the value proposition of the Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) role, their organisational experience and the barriers and facilitators to optimise and promote the long-term sustainability.
A qualitative sub-study of a larger multi-method study focused on informing policy recommendations to optimise the CNS workforce, informed by integrated knowledge translation.
Chief Nursing Officers (CNOs) and other senior leaders in all health authorities in British Columbia, Canada, were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews via video call between August–December 2023. We recruited 13 participants from diverse health regions, including 5 CNOs.
Leaders collectively conveyed a renewed interest in the CNS role to support nursing and multidisciplinary teams to better meet patient and system needs, and a sense of urgency to optimise the role in diverse settings. The overarching theme of “success by design” was supported by three thematic priorities: (1) understanding the CNS role, (2) a role that needs protection and connections and (3) moving forward together. Views were aligned to co-construct implementation-ready policy recommendations to guide provincial strategies.
Senior leaders reported a common understanding of the value-add of the CNS workforce and had a shared experience of barriers to optimisation. Contemporary policy guidance is needed to equip health systems to address this gap.
Across international regions, the role of CNSs is not fully optimised. This is a wasted opportunity to address the pressing need for nursing practice leaders to transform health systems and improve outcomes. This study provides new knowledge about the perspectives of Chief Nursing Officers and other nursing leaders to shape comprehensive and targeted policy recommendations and address enduring and new challenges to realise the full impact of the CNS workforce.
We have adhered to COREQ reporting guidelines (See supplemental file).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To describe the lived decision-making experiences of parents during the first 6 months after their children's new cancer diagnoses.
Descriptive phenomenological study.
This study was conducted from 2022 to 2023 at an academic teaching hospital in Taiwan. Parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer within the previous 6 months were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected via in-depth interviews with 18 participants and subsequently analysed using the Giorgi method.
Three major themes emerged: (1) making decisions without choices, with the subthemes of parallel universes and realities and overwhelming information and unanswered questions; (2) deferring decisions to expert judgements, with the subthemes of trust in professionals, working together, and seeing the future; and (c) balancing quality of life and survival, with the subthemes of confronting and suffering, mental preparation and worry, and being a strong supporter and carrying burdens. Hope for their children's survival sustained parents, empowering them to become steadfast sources of strength and support. Through hope, they transitioned from feeling helpless to actively advocating and assuming the primary caregiver role.
After deciding to proceed with their children's cancer treatment, hope for survival becomes the strongest factor motivating parents to navigate, explore, and move forward in an environment filled with uncertainty. Psychological preparation and understanding ease parental anxiety.
The development of clear, structured care plans is recommended to help parents feel supported and transition early from novices to confident guides.
The findings of this study highlight the shift in parents' roles following children's cancer diagnoses from facing unavoidable decision-making to actively striving to balance children's quality of life with treatment outcomes. They provide guidance for the support of parents' engagement with decision-making plans in clinical practice.
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.
None.
Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3D HRAM) is a minimally invasive test allowing the assessment of lower gastrointestinal tract function. Nowadays, it is performed in left lateral or supine position (non-physiological) in accordance with the London Protocol. 3D HRAM can disclose pathological defecation model such as dyssynergic defecation (DD) that might be a cause of constipation in a significant percentage of patients.
3D HRAM in healthy adults in lying position shows up to 67%–87% abnormal results during the bear-down manoeuvre; it may result from the non-physiological position taken during the examination.
The aim of this study is to assess the influence of body position on parameters of the bear-down manoeuvre during 3D HRAM in children with constipation and healthy volunteers.
This is a prospective, case-control study. Study participants of 5–18 years old will be recruited and divided into two groups: (I) patients with functional constipation and non-retentive faecal incontinence diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria and (II) healthy controls. Tests will be performed both in supine and sitting positions, successively using 3D HRAM. The order in which the examination will be performed will be in accordance with the randomisation list generated by computer.
The primary endpoint of the study is the difference in the number of patients with DD detected in the sitting and supine positions.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw, Poland (KB/178/2019). The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal no later than 1 year after data collection. The abstract will be presented at relevant national and international conferences.
by Lei Xiong, Ke Li, Wendy Siuyi Wong
BackgroundDigital media usage has become an integral part of daily life, but prolonged or emotionally driven engagement—especially during late-night hours—may lead to concerns about behavioral and mental health. Existing predictive systems fail to account for the nuanced interplay between users’ internal psychological states and their surrounding ecological contexts.
ObjectiveThis study aims to develop a psychologically and ecologically informed behavior prediction model to identify high-risk patterns of digital media usage and support early-stage intervention strategies.
MethodsWe propose a Dual-Channel Cross-Attention Network (DCCAN) architecture composed of three layers: signal identification (for psychological and ecological encoding), interaction modeling (via cross-modal attention), and behavior prediction. The model was trained and tested on a dataset of 9,782 users and 51,264 behavior sequences, annotated with labels for immersive usage, late-night activity, and susceptibility to health misinformation.
ResultsThe DCCAN model achieved superior performance across all three tasks, especially in immersive usage prediction (F1-score: 0.891, AUC: 0.913), outperforming LSTM, GRU, and XGBoost baselines. Ablation studies confirmed the critical role of both psychological and ecological signals, as well as the effectiveness of the cross-attention mechanism.
ConclusionsIncorporating psychological and ecological modalities through attention-based fusion yields interpretable and accurate predictions for digital risk behaviors. This framework shows promise for scalable, real-time behavioral health monitoring and adaptive content moderation on media platforms.
To explore peer volunteers' experiences of delivering online support through SMART to at-risk mothers during the perinatal period, to inform future improvements to mobile-health-application (mHealth app) based peer-support interventions.
Descriptive qualitative research.
The study was conducted between February 2024 and June 2025 in a tertiary public healthcare institution in Singapore. Twenty peer volunteers were recruited via convenience and snowball sampling and participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
Four themes were identified: (a) Giving and receiving: the inner world of peer volunteers; (b) Navigating relational complexity in digital peer support; (c) Facilitating connection and continuity in digital peer support; and (d) Building better connections through supportive ecosystems.
Peers reported experiencing reciprocal benefits, such as a sense of fulfilment and achievement, while supporting mothers. Shared experiences and psychosocial vulnerabilities enhanced relatability, reassurance and rapport, which sustained supportive relationships. Challenges encountered by peers highlighted the need for strengthening both intervention design and peer training.
Regular check-ins by programme facilitators, alongside clear information, flexible guidelines and reassurance, can improve peer volunteers' motivation and resilience, thereby ensuring consistent and sustainable support for at-risk mothers.
Examined peer volunteers' experiences in providing online perinatal support to mothers with diverse psychosocial vulnerabilities. Peers offered emotional, informational and practical support, while mothers benefited from learning how peers had coped with their psychosocial vulnerabilities. Shared experiences fostered confidence and reassurance among mothers that they, too could overcome similar adversities. Valuable in providing both medically accurate perinatal information and meaningful social support to perinatal mothers.
The reporting of the study adheres to the standards outlined in the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
Mothers and peer volunteers contributed valuable insights and suggestions that helped in the design of the intervention.
To examine the perinatal experiences of at-risk mothers and their engagement with mobile-health-based care.
A qualitative descriptive study.
One-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 at-risk mothers, defined as those who were single, had low income, were at risk of depression, had adverse childhood experiences, gave birth to a baby with congenital disorders, or had a history of mental health conditions. Participants were purposively sampled at 6 months postpartum from a tertiary public hospital in Singapore between February and September 2024. Interviews continued until data saturation was achieved, were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
The study identified four overarching themes: (a) Me and my baby versus the world, (b) navigating vulnerability and strength in motherhood, (c) generational tensions in modern parenting and (d) reimagining perinatal care for every mother. Across the perinatal period, both intervention and control group mothers reported social isolation, emotional and physical strain and challenges balancing traditional family expectations with modern parenting practices. While mothers in the intervention group described receiving holistic support through the SMART program, those in the control group relied on ad hoc sources of support, such as social media platforms.
At-risk mothers experienced significant challenges during the perinatal period, and those who used a mobile-health-based perinatal intervention felt supported through its peer support and multimedia educational resources.
Mobile-health-based interventions can be integral aspects of standard nursing care. Future researchers must ensure that support rendered to at-risk mothers is culturally compatible and specific to the psychosocial vulnerabilities they experience. Increased contact and funding are vital, whereas artificial intelligence, multiple shared access and health monitoring trackers can shape future perinatal interventions.
A mobile-health-based perinatal intervention can have an enormous positive impact on the psychological well-being of vulnerable mothers worldwide.
This study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration ID: NCT06363019). Registered 4/12/23, first recruitment on 26/02/2024.
Hospitalisation is one of the most stressful life events for older adults, particularly for those who are pre-frail or frail. Multi-component community-based interventions have the potential to address the complex needs of older adults post-acute care admission. While some available interventions have been developed with end-user engagement, fully involving older people who are pre-frail or frail in the design of interventions has been less common. Multi-component community-based interventions that address the needs of older adults and their care partners with potential implementation barriers informed by healthcare providers, community partners and health system decision makers are needed. This protocol paper describes the planned process of co-designing for older patients discharged into the community, a Post-Acute Care Intervention for Frailty using Information and Communication technology.
The development of a complex multi-component frailty intervention which meets older people’s needs involves several concurrent tasks and methodologies, each informed by co-design and conducted with consideration to eventual implementation. These tasks include: (1) establishing a Research Advisory Board, (2) assessing the feasibility and validity of using hospital administrative data to identify frail or pre-frail older adults and their needs, (3) conducting a needs assessment of patients returning to the community, (4) mapping community assets to identify existing programmes and services to help tailor the intervention, (5) co-designing a multicomponent frailty intervention, (6) selecting study outcome measures and (7) selecting and tailoring a digital health patient portal to support intervention delivery, data capture and communication.
Each task requiring ethics approval will be submitted to the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board at McMaster University. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles, conferences and networks of relevant knowledge users who have the capacity to promote dissemination of the results. A toolkit will be developed to help researchers and healthcare providers replicate the methodology for other populations.
Patients with advanced cancer often face numerous physical, psychological, and practical challenges from their disease and treatments, yet interventions addressing their specific unmet needs remain limited.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored psychoeducational intervention (PEI) on stress, anxiety, depression, coping, and fatigue among advanced cancer patients in Indonesia.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted from August 2022 to March 2023 in Indonesia.
A total of 151 advanced cancer patients from a referral hospital in Indonesia were randomized into intervention and control (conventional management) groups. Participants were assessed using validated questionnaires including the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and Brief COPE at three time points: baseline (T0, before intervention), after first intervention (T1), and after second intervention (T2). The PEI was delivered face-to-face with telephone follow-up calls. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analysis was used to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness.
The intervention was significantly associated with improved coping and reduced fatigue scores. Significant time effects were observed for depression, stress, coping, and fatigue scores. For anxiety, a significant impact was found at the second time point but not at the third, compared to the baseline. The difference-in-difference (DID) analysis revealed significant effects on coping and fatigue scores, while anxiety only showed significance at the second time point.
This study provides evidence for the potential effectiveness of PEI in improving coping strategies, relieving stress, anxiety, and depression, and reducing fatigue among advanced cancer patients in Indonesia.
The tailored PEI, including follow-up phone calls, can be independently implemented by nurses. Focusing on patients' unmet needs and spirituality, this intervention can help manage mental health issues and strengthen coping mechanisms, potentially leading to positive effects on physical conditions such as fatigue.
FreshRSS 