Ensuring equity in medical specialist distribution is essential for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). This study explored the changes in the availability and distribution of medical specialists in Thailand from 2015 to 2024 and assessed the equity impacts on workforce.

A retrospective longitudinal analysis of national administrative workforce data.

Public and private hospitals across Thailand, covering 1471 facilities in 77 provinces.

The primary outcomes were specialist-to-population ratios and geographical equity measured using the Gini coefficient (G), where values closer to 0 indicate greater equity. Explanatory variables included specialty type, geographical region and the timing of major workforce policies, including mandatory service and specialty-specific legislative interventions.

Between 2015 and 2024, the GPs and specialists in Thailand expanded significantly, with improvements in both density and distribution. The Gini coefficient for GPs showed the largest equity improvement (G=0.42 in 2015 and G=0.22 in 2024), reflecting the impact of mandatory service programme and rural recruitment programmes. Among specialists, emergency and family medicine have shown rapid growth and significant reductions in distribution inequity, reflecting the success of legislative policies. Sustainability of workforce policies was challenged by the ‘leaking stock’ phenomenon due to attraction of career opportunities and economic drives.

Workforce targeted interventions have led to improvements in the availability and equitable distribution of GPs and medical specialists over the past decade. Further policy, such as retention incentives and assisted technology, is needed to achieve equitable distribution across all specialties, particularly in low-density fields. Thailand’s experience offers the lessons for other low- and middle-income countries as the evidence-based and equity-focused workforce policies for UHC advancement.

In Bangladesh, evidence on the long-term trajectory of adolescents' sexual and reproductive health (SRH) remains limited, largely due to the lack of longitudinal data to assess the changes over time. To address this gap, the Advancing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (AdSEARCH) project of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) set up an adolescent cohort study aimed at documenting changes in SRH knowledge, attitudes and practices, and identifying the factors affecting these changes. This article presents the baseline sociodemographic and SRH characteristics of this cohort as a pathway for future analyses.

This cohort study included 2713 adolescents from the Baliakandi Health and Demographic Surveillance System run by icddr,b. The cohort covered three age groups from girls and boys, giving a total of five cohorts: girls aged 12, 14 and 16 years; and boys aged 14 and 16 years. A total of seven rounds of data had been collected at 4-month intervals over 2-years follow-up period.

The majority of adolescents were attending school (90%), and school dropouts were higher among boys. Around 17% of the respondents were involved in income-generating activities, which were mostly boys. Among girls, the mean age of menarche was 12.2 years. Overall, 6% of adolescents had major depressive disorder, with prevalence increasing with age. Gender differences were evident regarding knowledge about conception and contraception. Egalitarian attitudes towards social norms and gender roles were found higher among girls (52%) compared to boys (11%). The majority of adolescents reported experiencing social/verbal bullying (43%), followed by physical violence (38%) and cyberbullying (4%).

This article presents the baseline findings only. A series of papers is in the pipeline for submission to different peer-reviewed journals. The findings from this study will be used to support data-driven policy formulation for future adolescent health programmes.

The management of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) involves a varied and comprehensive range of support services at various stages of an autistic individual’s life. In Thailand, parents/legal guardians of children with ASD often encounter challenges such as difficulty travelling from rural areas to access support services. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of a computer-based intervention programme for caregivers of children with ASD called the Thai Early Intervention for Autism—Assistive Technology for Caregivers (TEI4A-ATC), designed and implemented by a multidisciplinary team.

160 children and their caregivers are being recruited. They will be randomised 1:1 into two treatment arms: access to TEI4A-ATC for the intervention group and standard care for the control group. Before enrolment, ASD diagnosis will be conducted using the Thai Diagnostic Autism Scale: children’s ASD scores will be determined using the Thai Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist for evaluating communication, sociability and sensory/cognitive awareness and the Thai Early Developmental Assessment for Intervention for evaluating motor skills, social interaction, language development and problem-solving. Both assessment tools will be used again after 3 months of treatment. Similarly, the caregivers’ knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) for ASD care will be assessed using a questionnaire at enrolment and again after treatment. Comparison of the children’s ASD scores and caregivers’ KAP responses between the treatment groups and before and after treatment will be performed based on the intention-to-treat principle.

This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee for Mental Health and Psychiatry, Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health (DMH.IRB.COA 037/2565). Written informed consent will be obtained from the participants prior to enrolment. The study’s findings may be disseminated through scientific publications and conference presentations. The results of the study will be shared with key stakeholders, including caregivers, psychiatrists, policymakers and the general public, via appropriate dissemination channels to aid in creating appropriate practice and policy guidelines.

This study was registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20240320010) on 20 March 2024.