Losses of functional reserve across multiple physiological systems have been identified in frail patients, yet the exact aetiology of frailty remains unclear. Although strongly associated with chronological age, frailty often develops at a younger age in patients with organ failure. Frailty is prevalent in patients with kidney failure; however, individuals experience improvements in physical frailty measures following kidney transplantation. This makes younger patients with kidney failure a unique population for studying both the accelerated onset of frailty and its reversal. This research project aims to test the hypothesis that frailty secondary to organ failure and age-related frailty are associated with similar molecular and physiological measures.

This longitudinal study will recruit 150 patients in three groups. Group A (kidney transplant recipients aged ≥40 years; n=50) and Group B (patients aged ≥40 years active on the kidney transplant waitlist; n=50) will comprise younger adults with frailty from organ failure. Group C (adults aged ≥65 years (or ≥55 years for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients); n=50) will comprise older community dwellers. The primary outcome is the Frailty Index (FI). Secondary outcomes include the change in FI over time, and at baseline when considering various clinical metadata, immune parameters, kidney function and nutrition intake which will be measured at baseline and 12-month time points. Longitudinal changes in frailty will be analysed using linear mixed models with multiple testing corrections for false discovery rates.

Endocrine profiles and metabolomics, measures of immune function and microcirculatory dysfunction, will be measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and/or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The gut microbiome will be sequenced via shotgun metagenomics (Illumina NextSeq500, 150 bp paired-end, ³Gbp/sample). Circulating cell-free DNA/mitochondrial DNA will be quantified through droplet digital PCR. Microcirculation will be assessed via sublingual dark field videomicroscopy with glycocalyx markers measured by ELISA.

This study will be conducted with all stipulations of this protocol, and the conditions of the ethics committee approval. Ethical principles have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, all Australian and local regulations and in the spirit of the standard of Good Clinical Practice (as defined by the International Conference on Harmonisation). Organs/tissues will be sourced ethically and will not be sourced from executed prisoners or prisoners of conscience or other vulnerable groups.

Ethics approval was received by the Metro South Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2023/QMS/95392) and ratified by the University of Queensland.

Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, participant newsletters and health organisation collaboration.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia, with patients being 1.5–2 times more likely to develop these conditions. While both sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have shown potential neuroprotective effects in previous studies, their comparative effectiveness for preventing neurodegenerative outcomes has not been established. This study aimed to compare the risk of stroke, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) between patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and those treated with TZDs.

Multicentre, retrospective, observational, new-user, active-comparator cohort study.

Electronic health record-based databases from 11 secondary and tertiary institutions in South Korea from 1 January 2014 to 31 July 2025. The study period began in 2014, following the post-marketing surveillance initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors in Korea (November 2013), to ensure adequate drug availability and clinical adoption.

Patients aged 40 years or older who were newly prescribed either SGLT2 inhibitors or TZDs without prior exposure.

Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using sex as the primary covariate due to data availability constraints in the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model framework. The HRs with 95% CIs were measured via Cox regression analysis.

The study analysed 24 172 matched pairs for stroke outcomes (40 483 person-years in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 39 363 person-years in the TZD group), 25 111 matched pairs for dementia (41 924 person-years in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 40 726 person-years in the TZD group) and 25 237 matched pairs for AD (42 139 person-years in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 40 895 person-years in the TZD group) across 11 participating hospitals. After a 1:1 propensity score matching, the SGLT2 inhibitors showed no significant difference in stroke risk (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.23, p=0.62), while having significant reductions in dementia risk (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.98, p=0.04) and AD risk (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.83, p=0.005). Moreover, these protective effects for neurodegenerative outcomes were shown to be consistent across multiple hospital sites.

SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with a reduced risk of dementia and AD compared with TZDs in patients aged 40 years or older with type 2 diabetes and have neutral effects on stroke risk. These findings confirm the potential selective neuroprotective benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors for neurodegenerative outcomes, which may inform therapeutic decision-making for diabetic patients at risk of cognitive decline.

Access to general practice in England is a challenging issue of enduring importance. COVID-19 precipitated various abrupt changes, exposing and compounding existing problems. The access as human fit conceptualisation provides a nuanced understanding of access that extends beyond a limited focus on appointment numbers and speed. This qualitative study explored the pandemic’s impact on access to general practice and the experiences of patients and healthcare staff in England using access as human fit as an analytical framework.

A community-based participatory approach underpinned by qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups, and observations.

The following were conducted in Northwest England (December 2021—August 2022): interviews (10 participants) with patients, general practice staff and professionals; seven focus groups (42 participants) with patients from general practice patient groups and underserved groups; and twenty observation sessions of non-clinical access encounters (seven general practice and Primary Care Network premises; 45 hours total).

A rapid qualitative analysis methodology facilitated an abductive thematic approach, applying the dimensions of access as human fit to the data.

The access as human fit framework highlighted key areas where there is a lack of fit between patients and staff. Patients expressed that the array of access options and changes made it hard to know how to be a patient; some thought general practice should be ‘back to normal’ and the pandemic was an excuse to restrict access. Providers reported working harder than ever with insufficient resources.

The pandemic created greater distance between staff and patient realities of access. Access as a human fit facilitated in-depth exploration of patient and staff experiences, improving understanding and identifying key issues. Broader adoption and application of this framework, within policy and practice, could focus improvement efforts, optimise access fit and improve patient satisfaction and staff retention.