To seek consensus among global experts on concepts, measures and approaches to guide national and global action to address HIV-related stigma and formulate a call to action. This outlines priorities to unite actors in more effectively responding to and resourcing efforts to address HIV-related stigma.

An adapted Delphi consensus-building process using two rounds of online questionnaires.

Online questionnaires sent to a global expert panel.

50 global experts on HIV-related stigma and discrimination representing sectors including civil society, people living with HIV and key populations, research and academia, clinical practice, law, non-profit organisations, the United Nations, and policy and donor organisations.

The panel reached consensus on 55 points relating to the 12 broad themes extracted from the evidence base. These comprised the importance of addressing HIV-related stigma at scale; HIV-related stigma terms and definitions; Frameworks; Programming and approaches; Community leadership in HIV-related stigma-reduction implementation; Intersectional stigma and discrimination; Stigma and discrimination measures and assessment scales; Monitoring and evaluation; Stakeholder and community participation in monitoring and evaluation; Knowledge gaps and research needs; Funding and Commitment calls. From these, a consensus statement and call to action were formulated on priorities for strong political and financial commitments by all countries to reduce and mitigate HIV-related stigma and achieve global HIV targets adopted in 2021.

This study illustrated that global experts across sectors consider that action is needed to support the three critical enablers of the HIV response—society, systems and services—to ensure that HIV services are non-discriminatory and person-centred. The importance of attention and action to reduce stigma is critical in the current geopolitical and funding crisis affecting HIV and global health.

Most people who have experienced sexual violence (SV) will disclose the event(s) to someone. Key recipients of disclosure are those working in healthcare, and using sexual and reproductive health services can be an important step in accessing necessary medical care and being signposted to other services. Accessing this care and disclosing SV can be challenging. Evidence is lacking about how best to create a safe environment for disclosure to take place, how services can make changes to better facilitate this experience and what changes matter most.

Realist evaluation.

Sexual and reproductive health settings.

1-1 interviews with service users who have disclosed SV (n=18), three focus groups with healthcare professionals and survey respondents (n=2007).

Initial programme theories of what works, for whom and in what context were tested and refined with empirical data from a national survey, 1-1 interviews and focus groups. The final steps are presented here, bringing strands of the study together and informed using substantive theory.

The key steps in using healthcare on disclosure of SV relate to self-identification as a worthy candidate irrespective of background or presentation, ensuring empowerment during navigation of services, initial access to sexual healthcare made straightforward, validation by healthcare professionals when receiving disclosures, choice and control for service users during a collaborative interaction with healthcare professionals and aftercare that reflects needs particularly of minoritised groups.

We propose a novel way of considering Dixon-Woods’ candidacy theory seen through a trauma-informed lens for healthcare following SV, and how, by holding a trauma-informed lens to candidacy, steps of healthcare access and utilisation can be framed to ensure a safer environment for disclosure. This modified substantive theory marks the chosen endpoint of the realist evaluation and provides a transferable programme theory that can be considered in other settings.