To study the factors that influence physicians’ and patients’ use of, and willingness to use, economic information in clinical decision-making, and examine physicians’ views on whether clinical practice guidelines can support its use.

Semistructured focus group discussions with an inductive content analysis.

Finnish health centre general practitioners (GPs) and adult patient representatives, five groups of each.

22 GPs and 15 patient representatives.

In the GP groups, five factors involved in using economic information in clinical decisions were raised: the issue of who pays, knowledge about cost information, the cost-benefit ratio of treatments, care planning and health economic understanding. Concerning the inclusion of economic information in clinical guidelines, GPs raised themes including the content and means of presentation of economic information, and advantages and challenges related to the integration of economic information into clinical guidelines. In the patient groups, the identified themes related to seeing the costs of treatments, the organisation of healthcare services, inclusion of cost information in clinical guidelines, patient information and support, and cost containment in healthcare.

The study suggests that GPs and patients are willing to use economic information in clinical decision making. It also implies a need for easily accessible and understandable economic information, and that clinical guidelines may be a good way to support this. In addition, the study highlights the need for education on the economic aspects of healthcare for physicians.

Depression and sub-diagnostic depressive syndromes are prevalent and associated with suffering and reduced life expectancy. Access to care is limited even in countries with developed healthcare systems. In this context, it is important to strengthen the self-management expertise of people suffering from depressive symptoms. Smartphones offer the possibilities for improved self-management based on long-term monitoring of symptoms.

The present multicentre randomised controlled trial (the Protecting mental health in times of change (MENTINA) trial) aims to evaluate whether (1) daily smartphone-based monitoring and automatic rule-based feedback+smartphone-based outcome evaluations versus (2) smartphone-based outcome evaluations alone will improve depressive symptoms and other clinically relevant outcomes in participants with current depressive symptoms and/or one or more prior depressive episodes during a 12-month trial period.

The MENTINA trial is a multicentre randomised controlled parallel-group trial conducted in Denmark, Germany and Spain. Participants with current depressive symptoms and/or one or more previous depressive episodes are invited to participate. The included participants will be randomised to (1) daily smartphone-based monitoring and automatic rule-based feedback+outcome evaluations via smartphone (intervention group) or (2) outcome evaluations via smartphone alone (control group). All participants can continue with ongoing treatment in case they receive it. The trial started in May 2025 and has currently included 115 participants. The outcomes are differences between the intervention group and the control group in (1) Patient Health Questionnaire 9-items (PHQ-9) measured every 14th day during the 12-month trial period (primary), (2) WHO Quality of Life-BREF, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, monthly change in PHQ-9, proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction in PHQ-9, remission rate defined as PHQ-9≤9 and ≥5-point improvement, PHQ-9 scores after 6 months, area under the curve for PHQ-9 over the 12 months trial period, subgroup analyses in PHQ-9 in participants with or without lifetime depression, Perceived Stress Scale, user-reported healthcare contacts, usability of the app and negative effects, number of depressive episodes+duration and depressive-free days based on PHQ-9. A total of 660 participants will be included in the MENTINA trial.

The MENTINA trial is funded by the European Union under Grant Agreement No. 101 080 651. Ethical approval and approval from Medical Agencies have been obtained from Denmark (CIV-25-02-051094), Germany (CIV-25-02-05109) and Spain (CIV-25-02-051094). The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals, presented at scientific meetings and disseminated to patients’ organisations and media outlets.

NCT06919133.

Version 6, January 2026.

The ‘time-limited trial’ for patients with critical illness is a collaborative plan made by clinicians, patients and families to use life-sustaining therapies for a defined duration. After this period, the patient’s response to therapy informs decisions about continuing recovery-focused care or transitioning to comfort-focused care. The promise of time-limited trials to help navigate the uncertain limits and benefits of life-sustaining therapies has been extensively discussed in the palliative and critical care literature, leading to their dissemination into clinical practice. However, we have little evidence to guide clinicians in how to conduct time-limited trials, leading to substantial variation in how and why they are currently used. The overall purpose of this study is to characterise the features of an optimal time-limited trial through a rich understanding of how they are currently shaping critical care delivery.

We are conducting an observational, multicentre, focused ethnography of time-limited trials in patients with acute respiratory failure receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in six intensive care units (ICUs) within five hospitals across the US. Study participants include patients, their surrogate decision makers and ICU clinicians. We are pursuing two complementary analyses of this rich data set using the open-ended, inductive approach of constructivist grounded theory and, in parallel, the structured, deductive methods of systems engineering. This cross-disciplinary, tailored approach intentionally preserves the tension between time-limited trials’ conceptual formulation and their heterogeneous, real-world use.

This study has been reviewed and approved by the University of Wisconsin Institutional Review Board (IRB) as the single IRB (ID: 2022-1681; initial approval date 23 January 2023). Our findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations, and summaries for the public.

NCT06042621.

Persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders are conditions requiring a biopsychosocial approach to care, often from multiple professionals. The fragmentation of care common in most health systems results in unsatisfactory and challenging care experiences. Collaborative care networks form an important route towards improving outcomes and the overall experience of care for patients and professionals. While we have a good idea of what such collaborative care networks can look like, we lack knowledge on the practicalities of implementing change in such networks.

The core objective of this study is to implement change in a collaborative care network for persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders care. Our questions were twofold: first, what are examples of realistic action processes to improve such collaborative care networks? Second, what are, in our experience, conditions for an effective change process in such a collaborative care network?

Participatory action research approach embedded within an active regional network between May 2023 and May 2024. The process was led by an action group who selected objectives and related actions with the aim of improving the network, leading to better care for people with persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders as well as improving satisfaction among professionals.

ALK Netwerk Salland, a regional network of professionals and experts-by-experience, focused on care of persistent somatic symptoms. This network is based in the Salland region in the east of the Netherlands, centred around the city of Deventer.

The action group was made up of local stakeholders including experts-by-experience and health and social care professionals, facilitated by a researcher-in-residence. Other participants included members of the regional network who provided input towards the different objectives.

Over the course of a year, three objectives were selected and enacted, including assessing the resources of the network, improving knowledge of treatment options and improving the shared vision of care. The process faced some challenges, such as changes in action group members and a lack of resources and time to enact changes. However, by having a trusted and engaged team, working with an active network, we were able to enact significant changes to the network, which may be sustained and built on through the ongoing action group.

Future participatory action research studies would benefit from a trusted and embedded researcher-in-residence, meaningful involvement early in the process of experts-by-experience, and serious consideration of realistic outcome measures to monitor for evaluation of changes made.

Mobile diagnostic imaging services provided at home increase accessibility and convenience, particularly for older adults, people with disabilities and other vulnerable groups. These services can reduce the need for patient travel and support the routine monitoring of chronic conditions. However, current guidelines often overlook user acceptance and environmental considerations within the home setting.

To map studies that identify the models, barriers and facilitators for performing home-based diagnostic imaging/graph according to end users.

A scoping review was conducted following the methodological framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.

Studies that addressed mobile or portable diagnostic imaging or graph examinations conducted in the home for individuals of any age or health status were included. Studies were eligible if they reported on barriers, facilitators or user experiences. Studies that focused on wearable technologies were excluded.

The search strategy was developed using terms related to home-based diagnostic imaging/graph, portability, home setting and user perceptions. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, The ACM Guide to Computing Literature and LILACS, without restrictions on publication date or language. Additional grey literature was identified through Google Scholar.

Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardised form that captured study characteristics, types of procedures, target populations and reported barriers and facilitators. Quantitative data were summarised using absolute and relative frequencies. Qualitative findings were synthesised through basic content analysis to identify and categorise recurring themes.

Data were charted in tables to organise and visually map study contexts, methodological features and thematic patterns related to implementation and user experience.

Twenty-six studies published between 1998 and 2023 across 15 countries were included. The diagnostic examinations included mostly polysomnography, X-ray imaging and ultrasonography. Seven categories of barriers were identified, such as physical discomfort, equipment-related challenges and procedural limitations. Seven facilitators were also reported, including perceived comfort, patient satisfaction and equipment usability.

This review identifies key factors affecting the delivery and user experience of mobile diagnostic imaging at home, including logistical, technical and environmental aspects. It reveals gaps in the literature and provides a basis for future research to inform more inclusive and effective public health policies and service design.

Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/7UV5D).

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) prescribing patterns have shifted in recent years in British Columbia (BC), Canada due to the increasingly toxic unregulated drug supply. Experimental evidence to support guidelines on the effectiveness of maintaining clients at different maintenance dosage levels is incomplete and outdated for the fentanyl era. Our objective is to assess the risk of treatment discontinuation and mortality among individuals receiving different maintenance dosage strategies for OAT with methadone, buprenorphine/naloxone or slow-release oral morphine (SROM) at the population level in BC, Canada.

We propose a retrospective population-level study of BC residents initiating OAT on methadone, buprenorphine/naloxone or SROM between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022 who were ≥18 years of age with no known pregnancy, no history of cancer diagnosis or receiving palliative care and not currently incarcerated. Our study will employ health administrative databases linked at the individual level to emulate a target trial per OAT type where individuals will be assigned to discrete maintenance dosing strategies, according to the full range observed in BC during the study period. Primary outcomes include treatment discontinuation and all-cause mortality. To determine the effectiveness of alternative maintenance doses, we will emulate a ‘per-protocol’ trial using a clone-censor-weight approach to adjust for measured time-dependent confounding by indication.

The protocol, cohort creation and analysis plan have been classified and approved as a quality improvement initiative by Providence Health Care Research Ethics Board and the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics. All data are deidentified, securely stored and accessed in accordance with provincial privacy regulations. Results will be disseminated and shared with local advocacy groups and decision-makers, developers of national and international clinical guidelines, presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals electronically and in print.