Women doctors face considerable challenges navigating family planning, pregnancy and motherhood. Their experiences can have relevance for health system functioning, including doctor retention. This scoping review synthesises research on family planning, fertility, pregnancy and motherhood among women doctors in the EU and the UK.

Scoping review conducted according to JBI best practice guidance.

MEDLINE, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, PsycInfo and Web of Science were searched, and supplemented with backwards and forwards citation chasing.

Peer-reviewed, original research, in English, focusing on either fertility and family planning, pregnancy and/or motherhood among women doctors in an EU country(s) and/or the UK.

Data were extracted independently by two authors. Data were synthesised using deductive content analysis and collated using narrative synthesis.

In total, 34 studies were identified. Family planning appears complicated by medical careers. Medical specialty choice is particularly impacted, with certain specialties (eg, General Practice) considered particularly family friendly and others markedly less so. Pregnancy complications among women doctors, especially surgeons, were documented. However, women doctors’ and non-doctors’ pregnancy outcomes were overall not significantly different. Notably, doctor-mothers had fewer children and were more likely to report making compromises or facing negative consequences when balancing family and career than doctor-fathers.

Women doctors in the EU and UK report challenges in balancing work and motherhood. With the potential for their experiences to impact on health system functioning and patient outcomes, training bodies and health organisations should take proactive action to better support women doctors and ensure they can remain in the profession and practice in their desired specialty. Future research examining working practices/schedules during pregnancy, breastfeeding experiences, parenting and childcare and maternal mental health will support a better understanding of women doctors’ experiences and facilitate implementation of effective supports.

Reusable menstrual products have gained increasing attention for their environmental and economic benefits, yet their uptake remains limited. University students represent a key demographic for understanding uptake, as young adults forming lifelong menstrual hygiene habits.

To synthesise evidence on university students’ knowledge, usage patterns and perceptions of reusable menstrual products, and identify barriers and facilitators to their adoption, to inform future interventions and educational efforts.

A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Scopus and Global Health was conducted, last updated on 31 October 2024.

Eligible studies contain data on perceptions of reusable menstrual products, specifically of students in university or higher education, or including segregated data on this population. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies were included.

Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. All data were summarised descriptively.

10 studies (4721 participants) across multiple countries were included. Findings suggest that while reusable menstrual products are viewed by some as cost-effective and sustainable, barriers include concerns relating to practical usage and health, limited awareness, misconceptions and cultural taboos. In the university context, peer influence, financial constraints and sociocultural factors play a significant role in shaping product choices.

Targeted education to increase awareness and address practical concerns and misconceptions, alongside peer support and provision of reusable menstrual products, could significantly enhance the adoption of reusable menstrual products in university settings. Further research into the health impacts of these products would support educational interventions.