Neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs) represent an unprecedented public health burden. These disorders are clinically heterogeneous and therapeutically challenging, but advances in discovery science and trial methodology offer hope for translation to new treatments. Against this background, there is an urgent unmet need for biomarkers to aid with early and accurate diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring throughout the care pathway and in clinical trials.

Investigations routinely used in clinical care and trials are often invasive, expensive, time-consuming, subjective and ordinal. Speech data represent a potentially scalable, non-invasive, objective and quantifiable digital biomarker that can be acquired remotely and cost-efficiently using mobile devices, and analysed using state-of-the-art speech signal processing and machine learning approaches. This prospective case–control observational study of multiple NDDs aims to deliver a deeply clinically phenotyped longitudinal speech dataset to facilitate development and evaluation of speech biomarkers.

People living with dementia, motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease are eligible to participate. Healthy individuals (including relatives or carers of participants with neurological disease) are also eligible to participate as controls. Participants complete a study app with standardised speech recording tasks (including reading, free speech, picture description and verbal fluency tasks) and patient-reported outcome measures of quality of life and mood (EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level, Patient Health Questionnaire 2) every 2 months at home or in clinic. Participants also complete disease severity scales, cognitive screening tests and provide optional samples for blood-based biomarkers at baseline and then 6-monthly. Follow-up is scheduled for up to 24 months. Initially, 30 participants will be recruited to each group. Speech recordings and contemporaneous clinical data will be used to create a dataset for development and evaluation of novel speech-based diagnosis and monitoring algorithms.

Digital App for Speech and Health Monitoring Study was approved by the South Central—Hampshire B Ethics Committee (REC ref. 24/SC/0067), NHS Lothian (R&D ref. 2024/0034) and NHS Forth Valley (R&D ref. FV1494). Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Data from the study will be shared with other researchers and used to facilitate speech processing challenges for neurological disorders. Regular updates will be provided on the Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic web page and social media platforms.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06450418 (pre-results).

Hospital administrators (HAs) aim to strike a balance between providing efficient and compassionate treatment. Health informatics and service management abilities are two areas that are evolving alongside digital health. This study outlines the health information technology (IT) competencies necessary for sustainability in the healthcare industry and looks at the competencies needed for HAs to manage everyday responsibilities.

Grounded theory is used in this qualitative study and reported based on the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. The participants were HAs who worked in different healthcare fields and held MBAs from the same private university. Respondents were selected through purposeful sampling, and consent was obtained before conducting telephone conversations. Data were gathered until the point of theoretical saturation. Every theme was outlined in a thematic framework.

Healthcare administrators gain knowledge about using applications and technology through the service. A hospital setting is a good place for healthcare administrators to begin their careers to fully understand the intricacies of the field. The key findings of the study indicate that HAs recognised policies and procedures as important areas of competency that required focused attention. HAs are increasingly relying on mid- to advanced-level healthcare technologies in their daily work. Each administrator has gained competencies according to their experience and opportunities. A few years of domain expertise make healthcare administrators competent and educated about every aspect of their profession.

According to healthcare administrators, practice and experience serve as the cornerstones on which their competencies are built. In the rapidly changing environment of digital healthcare, interdepartmental collaboration is essential for long-term success and adaptability, especially between HAs, IT personnel and medical specialists. Developing capabilities and resilience in this dynamic environment requires a diverse approach.

Mental illness typically onsets during the developmental stages from adolescence to emerging adulthood (ages 15–24 years), referred to as ‘youth’. A subset of youth with mental illness may be identified as having ‘complex’ mental health needs, defined based on requiring prolonged, extensive and resource-intensive services across multiple sectors, functional impairment, and comorbid challenges or multimorbidity . Effective early intervention for youth with complex mental illness is crucial to prevent the sequelae of long-term mental health problems. Several resource-intensive outpatient models have been developed to meet the needs of youth with complex mental illness; however, to the best of our knowledge, no scoping review has synthesised the available evidence on these interventions. A comprehensive synthesis of existing intensive outpatient interventions is needed to identify, target and inform future research and clinical efforts to better serve youth with complex mental illness. As such, the proposed scoping review will address the following research questions: (1) What intensive outpatient interventions have been evaluated for youth with complex mental illness? (2) To which populations are these interventions targeted? and (3) What outcomes have been examined within the context of these models?

This review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley framework for scoping reviews, and we will report the results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) recommendations. We will conduct a comprehensive literature search across seven academic databases to identify relevant peer-reviewed material in English from 1990 to the present. Inclusion criteria will address evaluations of outpatient models of care with intensive components targeted to youth ages 15–24 with features of complex mental illness. Studies will be screened independently for eligibility by two reviewers in Covidence using clear inclusion criteria. We will then collate, summarise and present the findings to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing evidence.

Ethical approval will not be required, as no data will be collected for the proposed project. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed articles, presented at conferences and shared with stakeholders to inform the development, implementation and evaluation of comprehensive transdiagnostic services targeting youth with complex mental illness.

Oral diseases are a major contributor to global disability but remain largely neglected in health policy, especially in low- and middle-income countries. India carries a disproportionately high burden of dental caries and periodontal disease, with limited access to oral healthcare and high reliance on out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE). Despite this, there is a lack of synthesised economic evidence specific to India, which limits informed policymaking and resource allocation. This systematic review aims to assess the economic burden and financial impact of oral diseases in India—at individual, household, health system and societal levels—focusing on direct and indirect costs, including OOPE and catastrophic health expenditure (CHE).

This review will follow the JBI methodology for economic evaluation evidence and adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. A three-step search strategy will be used to identify relevant studies from databases, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, CINAHL (Ovid), Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCO) and Cochrane CENTRAL, as well as grey literature sources.

We will include studies conducted in India that report on the economic burden or financial impact of oral diseases at the individual, household or population level. Eligible designs include cost-of-illness studies, cost analysis, cost-outcome analysis and health expenditure analysis using cross-sectional (including repeated cross-sectional) or cohort designs, as well as analyses based on secondary datasets. Studies using econometric, statistical or modelling methods, with or without comparators, will be included. Mixed-methods studies will be eligible if they provide extractable quantitative data.

Two reviewers will independently screen and appraise studies using JBI critical appraisal tools suited to each study design. Data extraction will focus on direct and indirect costs, including OOPE and financial impacts, such as CHE, hardship financing and poverty effects. Findings will be presented narratively and, where feasible, pooled in a meta-analysis using MetaXL V.5 software.

This review does not involve the collection or analysis of individual patient data. Instead, it will use data from publicly available economic research studies. All data sources will be appropriately cited. Extracted data will be systematically curated and managed using version-controlled spreadsheets and reference software. As this is a secondary analysis of published literature, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific presentations, as well as shared with policymakers and community health organisations via policy briefs and stakeholder outreach.

CRD420251030651.

To assess the implementation feasibility and acceptability of a structured digital psychosocial communication tool (DIALOG+) to strengthen the quality of person-centric care in psychiatric settings within Pakistan and India.

A hybrid inductive and thematic qualitative analysis using individual interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs).

Two psychiatric hospitals (Karwan-e-Hayat and Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre) in Karachi, Pakistan and one psychiatric care organisation (Schizophrenia Research Foundation) in Chennai, India

Interviews were conducted with 8 mental health clinicians and 40 patients who completed the DIALOG+ pilot as well as wider stakeholders, that is, 12 mental health clinical providers, 15 caregivers of people with psychosis and 13 mental health experts.

A technology-assisted communication tool (DIALOG+) to structure routine meetings and inform care planning, consisting of monthly sessions over a period of 3 months. The intervention comprises a self-reported assessment of patient satisfaction and quality of life on eight holistic life domains and three treatment domains, followed by a four-step solution-focused approach to address the concerns raised in chosen domains for help.

Key insights for the implementation feasibility and acceptability of DIALOG+ were assessed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis of 22 IDIs and 8 FGDs with 54 individuals.

Clinicians and patients ascribed value to the efficiency and structure that DIALOG+ introduced to consultations but agreed it was challenging to adopt in busy outpatient settings. Appointment systems and selective criteria for who is offered DIALOG+ were recommended to better manage workload. Caregiver involvement in DIALOG+ delivery was strongly emphasised by family members, along with pictorial representation and relevant life domains by patients to enhance the acceptability of the DIALOG+ approach.

Findings highlight that the feasibility of implementing DIALOG+ in psychiatric care is closely tied to strategies that address clinician workload. Promoting institutional ownership in strengthening resource allocation is essential to reduce the burden on mental health professionals in order to enable them to provide more patient-centric and holistic care for people with psychosis. Further research is required to explore the appropriateness of including caregivers in DIALOG+ delivery to adapt to communal cultural attitudes in South Asia.

Chronic inflammatory skin diseases, despite low mortality, significantly impair quality of life (QoL). Up to 80% of patients with dermatological conditions experience severe itch and poor sleep, as well as related mental health challenges such as anxiety and depression. The relationship between skin diseases and mental health highlights the challenges that doctors face in treating these conditions. Existing psychotherapeutics, such as mindfulness training, cognitive behavioural therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy, are widely used and effective in the treatment of mental health illnesses. However, there is limited evidence on the application of such interventions in dermatology, and most mental health apps lack robust clinical evaluation. We report the design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and implementation of a mobile app containing dermatology-specified psychotherapeutic strategies in reducing QoL burden.

English-speaking patients aged 16 years and older with psoriasis, eczema or chronic urticaria will be recruited and randomised into the intervention arm (psychotherapeutic application) or active control group (Healthy365 app, a general wellness application managed by the Singapore Health Promotion Board). This allows a comparative assessment of app-usage-specific outcomes while preserving the blinding of all participants. The primary outcome is the change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes include physician-assessed disease severity at weeks 8 and 16 relative to baseline, differences in other patient-reported measures at weeks 8, 16 and 32, self-reported treatment adherence and initiation/escalation of systemic medications. To understand how patients engage with the app, we will evaluate the implementation process, focusing on key measures such as engagement, satisfaction and willingness to pay. Statistical analysis will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis, and missing data will be analysed using last observation carried forward.

All participants will receive both verbal and written study information that aligns with Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Ethical approval has been obtained from the National Healthcare Group’s Domain Specific Review Board (reference number: 2022/00751). Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal. Data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

NCT06702293.