Conectar
by Thea Lynne Hedemann, Yun Lu, Sofia Campitelli, Lisa D. Hawke, Nelson Shen, Sarah Saperia, Brett D. M. Jones, Gillian Strudwick, Chelsey R. Wilks, Wei Wang, Marco Solmi, Michael Grossman, Muhammad Ishrat Husain, Nicole Kozloff, George Foussias, Muhammad Omair Husain
BackgroundYouth at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis often experience emotional dysregulation, psychiatric symptoms, substance use, suicidality, and functional impairment. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based intervention that improves emotion regulation, clinical outcomes, and functioning across psychiatric populations. Digital adaptations (d-DBT) may enhance accessibility and engagement for CHR youth, but acceptability and potential benefits in this group are unknown.
ObjectiveTo adapt d-DBT for CHR youth and evaluate the acceptability of delivering it to this population, as well as the feasibility of a larger-scale clinical trial.
MethodsThis mixed-methods clinical trial has two phases. In Phase 1, d-DBT will be adapted for CHR youth in collaboration with a lived-experience youth advisory group. In Phase 2, an assessor-masked randomized controlled trial will compare d-DBT (n = 30) with treatment as usual (n = 30). The intervention consists of eight weekly modules, with primary outcomes assessing acceptability, usability, and trial feasibility. Secondary outcomes include changes in emotional dysregulation, psychiatric symptoms, substance use, suicidality, and functioning.
ConclusionsWe anticipate that d-DBT will be acceptable to CHR youth and that conducting a larger trial will be feasible. Preliminary findings may demonstrate improvements in emotion regulation, psychiatric symptoms, suicidality, and functioning. Results will guide further refinement of the intervention and inform the design of a confirmatory clinical trial.
Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov #NCT06928935
To characterise the information needs and experiences of receiving COVID-19 vaccine information by youth with mental health concerns.
Thematic analysis of semistructured interview transcripts.
Semistructured interviews via WebEx video conferencing or by telephone.
46 youth aged 16–29 with one or more self-reported mental health concerns and six family members of youth.
Our analysis generated four main themes: (1) information content and characteristics; (2) critical appraisal; (3) modulators of information-seeking behaviour; and (4) unmet information needs.
Our findings suggest that youth with mental health concerns have unique information needs and processing patterns influenced by their environments and experiences with mental health concerns. Participants identified barriers to receiving reliable health information and suggested ways to improve this process.
Mental illness typically onsets during the developmental stages from adolescence to emerging adulthood (ages 15–24 years), referred to as ‘youth’. A subset of youth with mental illness may be identified as having ‘complex’ mental health needs, defined based on requiring prolonged, extensive and resource-intensive services across multiple sectors, functional impairment, and comorbid challenges or multimorbidity . Effective early intervention for youth with complex mental illness is crucial to prevent the sequelae of long-term mental health problems. Several resource-intensive outpatient models have been developed to meet the needs of youth with complex mental illness; however, to the best of our knowledge, no scoping review has synthesised the available evidence on these interventions. A comprehensive synthesis of existing intensive outpatient interventions is needed to identify, target and inform future research and clinical efforts to better serve youth with complex mental illness. As such, the proposed scoping review will address the following research questions: (1) What intensive outpatient interventions have been evaluated for youth with complex mental illness? (2) To which populations are these interventions targeted? and (3) What outcomes have been examined within the context of these models?
This review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley framework for scoping reviews, and we will report the results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) recommendations. We will conduct a comprehensive literature search across seven academic databases to identify relevant peer-reviewed material in English from 1990 to the present. Inclusion criteria will address evaluations of outpatient models of care with intensive components targeted to youth ages 15–24 with features of complex mental illness. Studies will be screened independently for eligibility by two reviewers in Covidence using clear inclusion criteria. We will then collate, summarise and present the findings to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing evidence.
Ethical approval will not be required, as no data will be collected for the proposed project. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed articles, presented at conferences and shared with stakeholders to inform the development, implementation and evaluation of comprehensive transdiagnostic services targeting youth with complex mental illness.
FreshRSS 