Child undernutrition is linked to substantial national economic and health losses in low- and middle-income countries, including Rwanda. Although the causal and contextual factors contributing to chronic malnutrition in children in Rwanda have been explored, the role of the mothers’ mental health has not been fully investigated. This study aims to determine the prevalence of major depressive disorders, generalised anxiety and suicide risk among mothers in Rwanda and to explore their association with child stunting.

This study used a cross-sectional, population-based design.

Participants included children aged 1–36 months (n=601) and their mothers (n=601) in Rwanda’s Northern Province. Mothers’ mental health was assessed using four modules from the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Child anthropometric measurements followed WHO guidelines.

The primary outcome of the study was child stunting that was defined as a height-for-age Z (HAZ) score

Among the 601 mothers assessed, generalised anxiety disorder had the highest prevalence (36.6%), followed by recurrent major depressive disorder (27.3%), current major depressive disorder (22.7%) and current suicide risk (18.2%). Among the children, 27.1% were stunted, with prevalence rising from 9.8% in infants (1–12 months) to 39.9% in toddlers (25–36 months). Current major depressive disorders in mothers were associated with child stunting (adjusted OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.61). Affected children had lower HAZ scores (–1.68±1.36 vs –1.30±1.09; p=0.004), and excess relative risk (ERR) analysis confirmed depression as a significant risk factor (ERR: 1.56; p=0.005).

Mental health disorders in mothers, especially depression, showed a significant association with child stunting. Addressing mental health disorders in mothers is essential for improving child nutritional outcomes.

Informal caregivers play a vital role in caring for individuals who choose to spend the end of their life at home. However, this caregiving role often imposes considerable physical, emotional, social and financial burdens that can negatively impact caregivers’ quality of life. A comprehensive understanding of the breadth of interventions designed to support caregivers of individuals receiving home-based palliative and end-of-life care is essential, along with insights into how these interventions are perceived by those who have received them. The objective of this review is to synthesise existing evidence on the effectiveness and appropriateness of interventions that support informal caregivers of patients receiving home-based palliative care in order to address the caregivers’ needs and improve their quality of life. Additionally, this review aims to explore the acceptability and perceived benefits of these interventions from the perspectives of informal caregivers who have received them.

A comprehensive search will be performed in the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Cairn.info, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). This review will include studies that focus on adult informal caregivers of adult patients with serious life-threatening illnesses receiving home-based palliative care. Interventional studies that employed quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods approaches will be considered. Quantitative studies will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Qualitative studies will encompass research that explores informal caregivers’ experiences with the interventions, perceived benefits and barriers and enablers influencing intervention effectiveness. Mixed-methods studies using convergent, embedded or sequential designs will also be included.

The search will include studies published in English or French, with no restrictions on the publication period. Study selection, critical appraisal and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers to ensure methodological rigour. This review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for mixed-methods systematic reviews, using a convergent segregated approach. Findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Ethical review is not required for this study, as it is a literature review that does not involve the collection of primary data. The findings of this review will be disseminated to the scientific community through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Additionally, lay summaries will be prepared and shared with the general public and relevant stakeholders.

PROSPERO, registration number CRD420251006612.