FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Predicting outcomes in selective fetal growth restriction of monoChOrioNic Twins: an inteRnAtional observational cohort STudy protocol (CONTRAST study)

Por: Noll · A. · Javinani · A. · Slaghekke · F. · Haak · M. C. · van Klink · J. · Van der Meeren · L. · Lopriore · E. · Russo · F. · Aertsen · M. · Shamshirsaz · A. · Shinar · S. · Bennasar · M. · Tiblad · E. · Herling · L. · Lewi · L. · Verweij · E. · CONTRAST Study Group · Keizer · Steggerd
Introduction

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. Current management relies on umbilical artery Doppler patterns in the smaller twin. These patterns are, however, inconsistent and do not represent a reliable severity scale, complicating clinical decision-making and parental counselling. This study aims to improve risk stratification by identifying predictors of adverse outcomes, while also evaluating the pathophysiology and multi-organ impact of sFGR in early childhood.

Methods and analysis

This is a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study conducted in six tertiary fetal medicine centres with expertise in complicated twin pregnancies. Recruitment began in March 2023 and will continue until December 2026, targeting 274 MCDA twin pairs with complete follow-up to develop a prediction model for adverse perinatal outcomes in sFGR at the time of diagnosis. Standardised data collection includes serial ultrasound examinations, advanced fetal imaging (cardiac, cerebral and 3D volumetric), fetal brain MRI and detailed placental phenotyping. Maternal and parental well-being are assessed during pregnancy and after birth. Neurodevelopmental outcome is evaluated up to 2 years after birth using validated tools. The statistical analysis plan includes predictive modelling with internal validation.

Ethics and dissemination

The study has been approved by the ethical review boards of all participating centres. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, international conferences and engagement with clinical guideline committees.

Trial registration number

NCT05952583.

Optimising regional organisation of endovascular thrombectomy for ischaemic stroke reusing a simulation model

Objectives

This study assessed whether a previously developed Monte Carlo simulation model can be reused for evaluating various strategies to minimise time-to-treatment in southwest Netherlands for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients who had an ischaemic stroke.

Design

Reuse of a previously developed simulation model to simulate various strategies in another region, using prospectively collected data from stroke centres and retrospective data from emergency medical services.

Participants

Data from 509 patients who had an ischaemic stroke (≥18 years) treated with EVT (2014–2018) were used.

Interventions

Input for the simulation model reuse included distributions of observed time delays along the acute stroke pathway. Validation of the baseline models was based on face validity and statistical measures (patient data vs model output) using the Assessment of the Validation Status of Health Economic decision models tool. We simulated strategies for a subregion: interhospital patient transfer by helicopter, transport of the neurointerventionalist to the primary stroke centre (‘drive-the-doctor’), interhospital patient transfer to a thrombectomy-capable stroke centre (TSC) outside the region and prehospital triage using the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) scale.

Primary outcome

Onset-to-groin time was the outcome.

Results

Reuse of the original simulation model was obtained by minimal effort, implying limited adaptation. Compared with the baseline model, interhospital patient transfer by helicopter or to a TSC outside the region and prehospital routing using the RACE scale reduced mean onset-to-groin time by 16, 13 and 39 min, respectively (95% CrI for all: equal to the point estimate). ‘Drive the doctor’ reduced mean onset-to-groin time by 27 (car), 49 (ambulance) or 58 min (helicopter), each with a 95% CrI equal to the point estimate.

Conclusions

The original simulation model can be applied to different regions in the Netherlands. Strategies tested within the subregion resulted in promising results of ‘drive the doctor’ and prehospital patient routing using the RACE scale.

Optical correction of hyperopia in school-aged children: a scoping review protocol

Por: Srinivasan · G. · Kerber · K. L. · Liu · S.-H. · Manh · V. M. · Huang · K. · Williamson · A. · Sadhu · S. · Ollinger · M. C. · Tajbakhsh · Z. · Fisher · J. H. · Cheung · N. L. · Junge · J. · Chan · K. C. H. · Hussaindeen · J. R. · Simard · P. · Trast · K. R. · Morettin · C. E. · Krueger
Introduction

Prescribing patterns for hyperopia in children vary widely among eye care providers worldwide. This scoping review aims to identify and map the current literature on optical correction and catalogue outcomes reported, particularly in the domains of vision, vision-related functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in school-aged children with hyperopia.

Methods and analysis

This protocol was developed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute’s Manual for Evidence Synthesis. We will include studies involving school-aged children with hyperopia without restrictions on sex, gender, race, ethnicity, type of optical correction, length of intervention, publication date or country of origin. We will include studies with internal or external comparison groups. We will exclude studies associated with myopia control treatments, ocular and visual pathway pathologies affecting vision or visual function. We will search Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase.com and PubMed. Examples of data to be extracted include population demographics, visual acuity, study-specific definitions for refractive error, treatment regimens for optical correction, vision and vision-related functional outcomes and QoL (general or vision-related) as quantified by validated instruments.

Ethics and dissemination

Informed consent and Institutional Review Board approval will not be required, as this scoping review will only use published data. The results from the scoping review will be disseminated by publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and at professional conferences.

❌