FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Can social prescribing intervention reduce unplanned hospital usage in an ethnically diverse and deprived population: a quasi-experimental study using a dynamic staggered difference-in-differences approach

Por: Hou · B. · Moss · R. H. · Hammad · M. · Abbas · S. · McCooe · M. · Wright · J. · Wildman · J. · Sheldon · T. · Dickerson · J.
Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a social prescribing intervention (the Central Locality Integrated Care Service (CLICS)) on unplanned hospital usage in the city of Bradford.

Design

A quasi-experimental study applying a dynamic staggered difference-in-differences (DID) analysis on a propensity matched cohort between 2019 and 2023, using data from the Connected Bradford dataset, a pseudonymised linked health dataset on the whole Bradford population.

Setting

CLICS was delivered within general practices in deprived and ethnically diverse inner-city areas of Bradford, Yorkshire, UK.

Participants

In total, 1304 CLICS patients were matched to 5216 control patients on key characteristics including ethnicity, deprivation, age, gender and health conditions.

Interventions

A proactive social prescribing intervention that integrates clinical and non-clinical services, including an individualised approach to tailor support based on the patient’s needs, both within primary care services and by linking them to appropriate community-based assets/services.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was the rate of unplanned hospital admissions and the secondary outcome was unplanned accident and emergency (A&E) attendances.

Results

CLICS patients were 2.1% (95% CI –3.8% to –0.4%, p=0.013) less likely to have an unplanned hospital admission and 2.4% (95% CI –4.6% to –0.2%, p=0.03) less likely to have an unplanned A&E attendance compared with the matched control. The DID analysis demonstrated a gradual increase in the association over time. Subanalyses revealed heterogeneity by ethnicity, the reduction in unplanned hospital admissions was observed only in patients of the Pakistani group, whereas the reduction in A&E attendances was statistically significant only in the white British group.

Conclusion

The CLICS intervention was associated with a reduction in unplanned hospital usage. Social prescribing may be a valuable component of strategies to reduce health inequalities in unplanned hospital usage.

Which Aspects of Abortion Care Do Healthcare Practitioners in Britain Think Nurses/Midwives Should Provide? Findings From the SACHA Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore the views of healthcare practitioners in Britain regarding the role of midwives and nurses in the delivery of medical and surgical abortion.

Design

An observational study of the Shaping Abortion for Change study healthcare practitioner survey (2021–2022).

Methods

Relationships between healthcare practitioner type, participant characteristics, knowledge of and attitudes towards abortion, and views about nurses' and midwives' role in abortion care were examined using Pearson's Chi-squared tests of association and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Amongst 763 participants including doctors, nurses, midwives and pharmacists, 71.6% supported specialist nurses in sexual and reproductive health and abortion clinics and hospitals, expanding their roles to include prescribing abortion medications and surgical abortion methods. Support was lower for midwives (35.8%) and primary care nurses (32.5%). There was considerable support for all nursing and midwifery groups to be involved in adjacent tasks of abortion care. Differences in support by healthcare practitioner type persisted after adjustment for exposure variables.

Conclusion

There is strong support for specialist nurses to expand their role in abortion care. This change could be implemented following clarification of the legal position. Some healthcare practitioner groups are more reluctant to support broader involvement of nurses and midwives in abortion provision.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

Expanding specialist nurses' role in abortion care could increase service capacity and improve patient access and experience. Understanding and addressing the concerns of healthcare practitioners opposing this change is critical for successful implementation and patient safety.

Impact

This study addresses the potential for nurse and midwife role expansion in abortion care. The findings highlight broad support for specialist nurses whilst identifying barriers to wider role expansion. The research informs policy discussions on workforce optimisation and access to abortion services across Britain.

Reporting Method

This study adheres to the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Patient or Public Involvement

In the SACHA study, patient and public involvement was included at all stages to inform study design, recruitment, data collection and analysis.

❌