The transition from clinical practice to an academic role presents a multifaceted challenge for anaesthesia master’s students in Iran, as it demands not only clinical expertise but also the development of educational competencies. This protocol outlines a sequential multimethod study designed to explore the dimensions of this role transition, identify the challenges and facilitators inherent in assuming a clinical educator role, and ultimately provide a foundation for evidence-based educational interventions.

This sequential multimethod protocol comprises three phases. Phase I involves qualitative thematic content analysis using semistructured focus groups and, where necessary, individual interviews with MSc anaesthesia students to explore experiences of role transition. Qualitative data will be analysed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase approach. Phase II consists of an integrated review of the literature to synthesise existing evidence on transition to clinical educator roles in anaesthesia and related healthcare disciplines. Phase III integrates findings from both phases using the Pillar Integration Process to generate a comprehensive, evidence-informed framework of role transition.

Ethical approval for the study has been obtained from Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.SPH.REC.1403.236), and written informed consent will be secured from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through publications in reputable peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences, contributing to the refinement of training programmes for clinical educators within anaesthesia education.

Today, arterial blood gas (ABG) testing is widely used in various hospital departments to support diagnosing diseases and predicting patient conditions. However, interpreting the numerical results of this test, its complex concepts continue to pose challenges for nurses and physicians. Therefore, the use of innovative educational approaches can simplify the learning of ABG interpretation. Two educational approaches that have recently received attention are the Flipped classroom and Microlearning. To evaluate and compare these approaches, we will develop a comprehensive evaluation protocol based on Kirkpatrick’s model.

This study is a quasi-experimental design that will involve 188 undergraduate nurse anaesthesia students at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, randomly allocated to a flipped classroom or microlearning groups (94 per group). The intervention will consist of one session for all registered students and three sessions for each group with their own educational approach. Two sets of educational content, according to each approach method, will be developed based on a needs assessment and will be shared via secure social media. The flipped classroom group will receive pre-session materials, followed by in-person classes. The microlearning group will engage in in-person sessions supported by micro videos, podcasts and micro games delivered via Telegram. Effectiveness will be evaluated by using Kirkpatrick’s four-level model. 1 week after the intervention concludes, participants will be invited to a meeting to complete the Training Satisfaction Rating scale (Level 1, Reaction). We will use a pre-test and a post-test for evaluating Level 2 (Learning). Level 3 (Behaviour) will be evaluated through observations of ABG interpretation at internship sites. Level 4 (Results) will be evaluated via semi-structured interviews with specialists and colleagues. Data will be analysed blind; normality will be assessed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), and appropriate statistical tests (t-tests, ANCOVA, ² or Fisher’s exact) will be applied.

This study received permission and ethical approval from Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.SPH.REC.1404.08). Since the study is not clinical, obtaining a trial registration number is not required under Iranian research policy, and an ethical approval alone is sufficient. Informed consent will be obtained before participants are enrolled. The study’s results will ultimately be submitted as a research paper to a peer-reviewed journal.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a fast-growing chronic disease, with at least 1.3 million people diagnosed in Australia. In the Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD), an estimated 13.1% of all adults have T2DM. The condition significantly contributes to cardiovascular, heart and kidney diseases and causes a large disease burden. Lifestyle modifications, such as improved nutrition, increased physical activity and stress reduction, are recommended as first-line treatments for T2DM management. However, the current primary care system cannot meet the growing demands for diabetes care, necessitating the development of innovative, scalable, cost-effective solutions. Digital health technologies present a promising approach for promoting self-management in individuals with T2DM.

This cluster-randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of Gro-AUS, a localised version of the Gro Health app in Australia, to support T2DM management in Australian primary care settings. The trial will be conducted across multiple general practice clinics within the WSLHD, an area with a high prevalence of T2DM and significant cultural diversity in patient populations. Participants will be randomly assigned by clinic to either the intervention group (digital health programme) or control group (standard care). Primary outcomes include improvements in glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes remission, with secondary outcomes such as weight loss, physical activity and mental well-being. Data will be collected using electronic and paper methods, with secure storage and de-identification ensuring participant privacy. The study’s mixed-method approach ensures inclusivity for patients with varying levels of digital literacy. Data will be securely stored, de-identified and used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. Findings are expected to inform future models of diabetes care in Australia, providing evidence for the scalability of digital health technologies in chronic disease management.

This trial is by nature unblinded. The recruitment style for a stepped-wedge trial may also bias participant engagement. However, it has direct implications for clinical practice as an effectiveness implementation trial. The design also allows for a much larger sample and more statistical power to examine outcomes.

This trial has been prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Ethical approval has been granted by the WSLHD Human Research Ethics Committee prior to data collection. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal and shared via the Agency for Clinical Innovation, the Primary Care Health Network and through community engagement initiatives.

ANZCTR388639.