Conectar
Clinical practice guidelines support evidence-based care and aim to reduce unwarranted variation in healthcare. Despite evidence that guideline-adherent physiotherapy is associated with reduced healthcare utilisation, adherence among physiotherapists remains inconsistent. This scoping review aimed to synthesise evidence on determinants of guideline adherence and implementation strategies in physiotherapy and to identify research gaps relevant to guideline implementation.
Scoping review.
MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PEDro and CINAHL were searched from database inception to July 2023 and updated in July 2025. Grey literature sources, including Grey Literature Report, OpenGrey and Web of Science Conference Proceedings, were also searched. Reference lists of included studies were screened.
Studies were eligible if they examined determinants of guideline adherence and/or implementation strategies in physiotherapy. Studies involving physiotherapists across all clinical fields and settings were included. Only studies published in English or German were considered.
Determinants were analysed using qualitative content analysis and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implementation strategies were summarised using Proctor’s reporting recommendations.
Fifty-eight studies were included: 29 examined determinants, 25 implementation strategies and four both. Determinants were identified across all CFIR domains, with most relating to the Inner Setting and Characteristics of Individuals. Implementation strategies primarily targeted individual-level change, such as education, reminders and feedback, whereas few addressed system-level factors, including organisational leadership or reimbursement structures.
Guideline implementation in physiotherapy is shaped by determinants across individual, organisational and system levels, yet current strategies predominantly focus on individual clinicians. This individual-level focus may contribute to the responsibilisation of clinicians for care quality, while organisational and system-level strategies that have shown promise in other fields remain underutilised in physiotherapy. Future implementation initiatives should adopt broader, system-oriented approaches to enhance long-term implementation success.
Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/g5cpt/).
The aim was to validate the stoma self-efficacy scale and assess the psychometric properties of the Czech version of the scale in patients with intestinal stoma. Another aim was to assess self-efficacy in patients with intestinal stoma.
Descriptive, cross-sectional and validation study.
Two hundred and ninety patients with intestinal stoma participated in the study during 2023. The original SSES instrument was linguistically validated into Czech. Content validity of the scale, test–retest, intraclass coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's ω, construct and convergent validity were assessed for psychometric properties. The study followed STROBE guidelines.
The stoma self-efficacy scale was adopted into Czech, demonstrating excellent content validity. An intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to establish test–retest reliability, showing excellent reliability of the Czech version. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's ω showed high reliability. Factor analysis was applied for construct validity. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract three factors on the Czech version of the scale: Stoma care self-efficacy, social self-efficacy and burden self-efficacy. The factors accounted for 62.05% of the total variance and showed strong internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied separately to the data of respondents with colostomy and respondents with ileostomy. The fit indices were satisfactory for respondents with colostomy after adjustment. The composite reliability coefficient showed acceptable values in each factor.
The Czech version of the stoma self-efficacy scale has excellent psychometric properties in patients with intestinal stoma. It is a reliable tool for use in patients with intestinal stoma to assess self-efficacy. The scale can also be used by nurses who care for these patients and based on this, meet the individual needs related to patients' self-efficacy.
FreshRSS 