Conectar
Delirium, a common, serious and often preventable complication in older hospitalised adults, contributes to significant health and social care costs. Carers are uniquely positioned to identify early signs and support delirium prevention. The Prevention & Early Delirium Identification Carer Toolkit (PREDICT), a novel model of care designed to educate carers about delirium management and prevention strategies, enables them to actively participate in the care and recovery of their person. Developed through a comprehensive literature review, a co-designed eDelphi and pilot study, PREDICT demonstrated acceptability and feasibility.
To evaluate the effectiveness, implementation and cost-benefit of a PREDICT in hospital settings.
A stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (SW-cRCT), consisting of a cohort study, healthcare service evaluation, and process evaluation. The study will assess carer and staff knowledge of delirium, carer care giving stress, health service outcomes (e.g., incidence, length of stay, readmissions) and cost-benefit.
PREDICT is a scalable, person-centred approach that supports both patients and carers, with the potential to embed best-practice delirium management into routine healthcare.
This study was developed in consultation with older adults, carers and healthcare staff. Two consumer representatives joined the project steering committee and contributed to shaping the research question, refining the study protocol and selecting outcome measures relevant to families and healthcare staff. Carers were involved in reviewing participant information sheets and the PREDICT website, providing feedback to ensure clarity and accessibility. Results will be shared with participants and the wider community through plain-language summaries and public presentations.
Australian and New Zealand Clinical trial: ACTRN12625000705482 registered on the 3rd of July 2025
Develop and simulate test a digital alert dashboard drawing from existing data to support nurses, care workers and managers in residential aged care.
Participatory action research, co-designing for an Australian 64-bed residential site.
Qualitative data were collected through focus groups and analysed using reflective thematic analysis.
Nursing-theory and evidence-based Nursing Data Domain Standards (NDDS) were developed to support internal triaging of fundamental and clinical care in a non-clinical environment. A co-designed retrospective digital alert dashboard (Aged Care Electronic Dashboard Information Tool—ACED-IT) representing the Standards was created and tested. Twenty aged care nurses, care workers and managers found it had promise in enhancing quality of care, improving resident health and reducing adverse events.
Maximising efficient use of resident-level data with a system that empowers nurse decision-makers is crucial to support effective care design and harm prevention.
ACED-IT has the potential to improve visibility of resident needs, support staff to adjust their workflow based on in-house triage, enhance supervision of staff and quality of care and reduce preventable complications.
Digital systems that enable nursing care escalation and triaging for early intervention are needed in residential aged care settings. The co-designed system was perceived by registered nurses, care workers and managers to have the potential to improve care quality and efficiency. Using an evidence-informed nursing framework to identify day-to-day care indicators can be widely implemented by government regulators, software providers and residential care providers on an international scale to improve resident experience.
This study adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines, specifically the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) Checklist.
A member of the public participated in the Advisory Group, observed and contributed to the co-design process and reviewed the manuscript.
What are care workers' lived experiences caring for people of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds during end-of-life care?
Interpretative phenomenological analysis
The lived experiences of 11 care workers within the Australian Capital Territory and region who have cared for someone of a culturally and linguistically diverse background during end-of-life care were captured. Each care worker was interviewed individually and answered a series of semi-structured open-ended questions.
Using interpretative phenomenological analysis, three group experiential themes were derived: (i) navigating cultural shock and death, (ii) the hard work of communication and (iii) searching for deeper connections with client and self. Within these were key elements: Care workers worked hard to embrace cultural diversity, but struggled to meet cultural needs, particularly in relation to the unpredictable timeline of dying. Care workers relied on themselves and their improvisation, but experienced self-blame for inadequate care and unexpected challenges in communication. Blurred boundaries in relation to therapeutic relationships were apparent, and care workers felt alone with emotional burden, but also found belonging and joy in their work.
Care workers' experiences are vital to understanding the barriers and challenges in providing culturally appropriate end-of-life care. Care workers repeatedly experienced an emotional burden and vicarious trauma throughout their work in this field. Care workers were self-reliant in all aspects of care including communication and consistently desired education, training, resources and support. There remains inadequate research on care workers and their role within the Australian healthcare context.
Care workers need access to support and resources including professional translators to provide culturally appropriate end-of-life care. Workplaces and registered nurses should facilitate training and provide guidance to care workers. A person-centred approach is required during all client encounters while maintaining appropriate therapeutic relationships including therapeutic use of self and professional boundaries.
COREQ Checklist.
During this study, care workers were interviewed on their experiences caring for people of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds during end-of-life care. Patients were not directly involved within this study, but their views may have been expressed through the care workers' experience.
To identify the reasons and/or risk factors for hospital admission and/or emergency department attendance for older (≥60 years) residents of long-term care facilities.
Older adults' use of acute services is associated with significant financial and social costs. A global understanding of the reasons for the use of acute services may allow for early identification and intervention, avoid clinical deterioration, reduce the demand for health services and improve quality of life.
Systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022326964) and reported following PRISMA guidelines.
The search strategy was developed in consultation with an academic librarian. The strategy used MeSH terms and relevant keywords. Articles published since 2017 in English were eligible for inclusion. CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection were searched (11/08/22). Title, abstract, and full texts were screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria; data extraction was performed two blinded reviewers. Quality of evidence was assessed using the NewCastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).
Thirty-nine articles were eligible and included in this review; included research was assessed as high-quality with a low risk of bias. Hospital admission was reported as most likely to occur during the first year of residence in long-term care. Respiratory and cardiovascular diagnoses were frequently associated with acute services use. Frailty, hypotensive medications, falls and inadequate nutrition were associated with unplanned service use.
Modifiable risks have been identified that may act as a trigger for assessment and be amenable to early intervention. Coordinated intervention may have significant individual, social and economic benefits.
This review has identified several modifiable reasons for acute service use by older adults. Early and coordinated intervention may reduce the risk of hospital admission and/or emergency department.
This systematic review was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore the experiences of partnership nursing among nurses when caring for children and young people with long-term conditions, and their families.
Partnership nursing is promoted as a positive model of care among paediatric nurses, where shared roles and decision-making, parental participation, mutual trust and respect, communication and negotiation are valued to create positive care experiences and enhance patient outcomes. Little is known about how nurses use partnership with both the patient and the parents in this triad to deliver partnership nursing.
A qualitative systematic review followed Joanna Briggs Institute meta-aggregation approach and has been reported according to PRISMA guidelines.
A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in seven electronic databases. Studies were assessed according to a pre-determined inclusion criteria. Qualitative findings with illustrative participant quotes were extracted from included studies and grouped into categories to inform overall synthesised findings. Methodological quality assessment was conducted.
A total of 5837 publications were screened, and 41 qualitative studies were included. Three overarching synthesised findings were identified: (1) Using education to promote feelings of safety and support, (2) Partnering to develop a strong therapeutic relationship and (3) Optimising communication underpinned by shared decision-making principles to deliver individualised care.
Nurses demonstrated successful partnership in their practice, but focused on developing dyadic nurse–parent and dyadic nurse–child partnerships. Future practice development that creates a three-way triadic partnership may aid therapeutic relationships and shared decision-making.
Clinicians can reflect on how dyadic partnerships (focusing on the child or the parent) may exclude opportunities for coherent care. Further exploration in practice, policy and research as to how nurses determine child competency and child and parent level of engagement in triadic partnership may improve the potential of meaningful shared decision-making.
FreshRSS 