Conectar
To describe diagnostic categories and comorbidities associated with increased risk of readmission within 28 days among older adults.
Retrospective observational study of all hospital admissions following ED attendance by patients aged ≥ 60 years between July 2020 and June 2023. Index and subsequent 28-day readmission were identified using ED data and hospital discharge records. ED diagnosis, Australian Refined Diagnosis-Related Group (AR-DRG) discharge codes, and ICD-10-AM comorbidities were extracted. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations with 28-day readmission. The study and findings have been reported against the STROBE-RECORD guideline.
Of the 28,730 initial patient visits, 7.9% re-presented within 28 days. The most common ED diagnoses at initial and readmission were chest pain (5.4% vs. 4.6%), falls (5.2% vs. 4.1%), dyspnoea (3.5% vs. 3.1%), abdominal pain (3.1% vs. 3.3%) and cerebrovascular accident (1.7% vs. 1.7%). The most frequent AR-DRGs were respiratory infections/inflammations, kidney and urinary signs/symptoms, and other digestive system disorders. Key ICD-10-AM codes associated with a higher likelihood of readmission within 28 days were obstructive/reflux uropathy (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.78–3.96), urinary retention (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.38–2.46), chronic ischaemic heart disease (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.10–2.25), delirium (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07–1.71) and disorders of fluid, electrolyte, and acid–base balance (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09–1.54).
Nearly 8% of older adults are readmitted within 28 days. Our described approach offers a potential framework to identify at-risk groups and intervene to reduce avoidable representations and/or admissions.
The results reported here create the opportunity for clinicians to identify areas for improvement in clinical practice, care coordination, and service delivery. Our approach and methodology can be replicated in other health services.
No patient or public contribution.
To identify whether nurse practitioners (NPs) in New Zealand (NZ) have the organisational opportunities to make decisions related to performing their role.
A cross-sectional study of self-reported decision-making, social support, psychosocial demands and identification with role in a representative population of NPs employed in a range of practice settings in NZ.
This study utilised the internationally validated Job Content Questionnaire. Reliability and construct validity were assessed using co-efficient α and confirmatory factor analysis. Linear regression analyses were conducted to understand the strength and direction of the relationships between the constructs.
All scales demonstrated acceptable levels of internal reliability. Factor analysis supported a five-factor model, with decision latitude, psychological job demands, co-worker support, supervisor support and job insecurity as the main factors fitting the theoretical model. Regression models suggested that NPs (n = 169) have more control over their decision-making when supported by their colleagues rather than supervisors. NPs perceive improved relationships with healthcare consumers if they feel an increase in support from their colleagues; this relationship is mediated by the freedom to make decisions. NPs in rural settings had more job security when they felt valued and appreciated at work.
The presence of collegial support significantly influences the freedom and autonomy of NPs in making decisions. Workforce policy, the organisation of practice and vocational training may be effective ways of helping NPs expand access to healthcare services.
Collegial and supervisory support are critical for NPs to work to their full scope. A funded, first-year-in-practice vocational training program designed to support role transition, foster collegial support and build a community of practice for newly qualified NPs.
For the first time, nurse practitioner decision-making and autonomy determinants have been described in NZ. These findings should be considered within the context of international evidence and in global nursing workforce policies that seek to create opportunities for NPs to work to the limit of their scope.
The authors have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines—STROBE checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 