Conectar
To assess the magnitude and associated factors of suicidal behaviour and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) among youth of the Gurage Zone, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Regional, Ethiopia, 2024.
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted.
This research was carried out in the Gurage Zone.
This study was conducted among 719 Gurage Zone youths from 1 January 2024 to 1 February 2024.
Suicidal behaviours and non-suicidal self-injury were assessed using a pretested, interviewer-administered, structured questionnaire. Data were entered in EpiData V,3.1 and exported to SPSS V.25 for analysis. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify significant factors associated with suicidal behaviours and NSSI. Variables with a p-value less than 0.05 and adjusted ORs with 95% CI were used to declare association with the outcome variable in the final model.
Out of the total 820 study participants, 719 participants participated in the study, giving a response rate of 88%. Among 719 respondents 465 (64.7%) were males. The prevalence of high risk of suicidal behaviours was 11.7% (95% CI 8.14 to 14.30) and it is significantly associated with substance use in the last 3 months (adjusted OR (AOR)=6.84; 95% CI 3.48 to 13.47), having moderate insomnia (AOR=3.09; 95% CI 1.30 to 7.31) and having depression (AOR=6.84; 95% CI 3.48 to 13.47).
The prevalence of NSSI among youths was 38% (95% CI 34.52 to 41.86). Substance use in the last 3 months (AOR=2.459; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.81), youths having depression (AOR=3.348; 95% CI 2.29 to 4.91), youths who were exposed to stressful life events (AOR=9.86; 95% CI 6.46 to 15.07) were significantly associated with NSSI.
Nearly 1 in 10 youths in the Gurage Zone exhibited high-risk suicidal behaviour, and over one-third reported NSSI. Suicidal behaviour was significantly associated with substance use, depression and moderate insomnia, while NSSI was significantly associated with substance use, depression and exposure to stressful life events. These findings highlight the prevalence of self-harm and the key factors associated with these behaviours among youth in this region.
by Abate Atimut Dereje, Dereje Geleta, Tadesse Menjetta, Abinet Takele, Susana Vaz Nery, Techalew Shimelis
BackgroundEarly diagnosis and prompt treatment of malaria cases are a crucial component of curative and preventive interventions. There have been reports of healthcare workers overprescribing antimalarial agents against guidelines, but the barriers they face in adhering to the guidelines are not well studied. This study aimed to investigate barriers to adherence to guidelines in prescribing antimalarial drugs in public healthcare facilities in Arba Minch, South Ethiopia.
MethodA cross-sectional descriptive exploratory qualitative method was employed. We included ten participants from public healthcare facilities, including health centres, a hospital, a city health office, and a zonal health bureau. A key informant interview technique was used to collect data. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Data analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti, version 7.5 software. The results were presented thematically and narrated to support the main themes.
ResultsPublic healthcare facilities primarily used blood smear microscopy to test all malaria-suspected patients. However, in cases of microscopy service interruptions or when confirming negative results, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were employed in some facilities. Limited availability of microscopes and reagents, and electric power interruptions hindered reliable microscopy services. Drug stock-outs, patient expectations for antimalarial drugs, self-treatment, and delayed care-seeking are barriers to adherence to malaria treatment guidelines. The main reason for non-adherence to withholding antimalarial drugs after negative tests was greater trust in clinical findings over laboratory results. Confidence in experience contributed to trust in clinical judgment, while perceived inexperience and negligence, inconsistent RDT and microscopy results, and poor-quality control assessment results undermined trust in laboratories. Despite supporting the guidelines, study participants emphasized the need for flexibility to allow empirical treatment and highlighted the lack of training and mentoring for healthcare workers.
ConclusionTo improve adherence to malaria treatment guidelines, it is essential to ensure consistent lab operations, enhance quality assurance, maintain effective communication between lab personnel and prescribers, and provide healthcare and patient education. Implementing training and mentoring programs and promoting evidence-based practices are also crucial.
FreshRSS 