Conectar
by Lian Trapman, Lea M Dijksman, Jan C. Grutters, Saskia C.C.M. Teunissen, Everlien de Graaf
BackgroundProgressive pulmonary fibrosis is a lethal disease with a survival of 3–5 years with optimal medication treatment. Palliative care and advance care planning are therefore receiving increasing attention in the literature. However, structural implementation in clinical practice is still lacking. The aim of this study was to explore the needs, facilitators, and barriers for communication on the topic of end-of-life preferences of patients from the perspective of healthcare professionals.
MethodsA generic qualitative study was performed with focus groups and individual semi structured interviews with healthcare professionals. Data collection and analysis were performed iteratively. A thematic analysis was performed, following the methods of Braun and Clarke.
ResultsThree focus groups and seven individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. Three themes were generated: (1) a lack of vision on palliative care, resulting in different approaches within the same clinic and showing the need for optimization of collaboration; (2) the importance of a learning-driven environment to support healthcare professionals skills and knowledge; and (3), the central role of the individual professional in developing skills and knowledge.
Conclusions/discussionThis study underscores the importance of behavioral and organizational change in palliative care to optimize conversations exploring values, preferences, and needs for end-of-life care for patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Leveraging the shared motivation of healthcare professionals to provide optimal care, integrating these findings into training and coaching programs can further enhance patient-centered approach in palliative care.
Body contouring surgery (BCS) can be applied to reduce the physical and mental burden of excess skin after massive weight loss. Self-reported outcomes of patients are used to assess this burden and to evaluate the effectiveness of BCS. The aim of this study is to clarify what is reflected in self-reports of excess skin after bariatric surgery. We hypothesise that the self-reported burden of excess skin is associated with both objectively assessed excess skin and the disposition to experience negative emotions.
This cross-sectional study will include 68 outpatients presenting at a plastic surgery clinic with a request for BCS. Patients fill out two questionnaires (the BODY-Q and the Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire (SESQ)) to measure the size and burden of excess skin as well as the Big Five Inventory (BFI) to measure the disposition towards negative emotionality. Anonymised photographs of excess skin will be rated independently by four plastic surgeons using the Pittsburgh Rating Scale (PRS) Rainbow Classification to establish the objective amount of excess skin. Multiple linear regression analyses will be performed to identify the association of BODY-Q and SESQ scores with objective appraisals of excess skin by plastic surgeons, negative emotionality and demographics. Interobserver agreement for PRS Rainbow Classification will be established by Fleiss’ kappa.
Ethical approval was obtained from the regional medical ethics committee (METC; W20.258) and the institutional review board (Lokale Toetsing, St. Antonius Hospital in Nieuwegein, no. Z23.035). Informed consent of participants will be obtained. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
FreshRSS 