Conectar
by Muluken Chanie Agimas, Mekuriaw Nibret Aweke, Berhanu Mengistu, Lemlem Daniel Baffa, Elsa Awoke Fentie, Ever Siyoum Shewarega, Aysheshim Kassahun Belew, Esmael Ali Muhammad
IntroductionMalaria is a global public health problem, particularly in sub-Saharan African countries. It is responsible for 90% of all deaths worldwide. To reduce the impact and complications associated with delayed treatment of malaria among children under five, comprehensive evidence about the magnitude and determinants of delayed treatment for malaria could be the solution. But there are no national-level studies in the Horn of Africa for decision-makers.
ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence and associated factors of delay in seeking malaria treatment among under-five children in the Horn of Africa.
MethodPublished and unpublished papers were searched on Google, Google Scholar, PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the published articles’ reference list. The search mechanism was established using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms by combining the key terms of the title. Joana Brigg’s Institute critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the quality of articles. A sensitivity test was conducted to evaluate the heterogeneity of the studies. The visual funnel plot test and Egger’s and Begg’s statistics in the random effect model were done to evaluate the publication bias and small study effect. The I2 statistics were also used to quantify the amount of heterogeneity between the included studies.
ResultsThe pooled prevalence of delayed treatment for malaria among under-five children in the Horn of Africa was 48% (95% CI: 34%–63%). History of child death (OR =2.5, 95% CI: 1.73–3.59), distance >3000 meters (OR = 2.59, 95% CI: 2.03–3.3), drug side effect (OR = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.86–4.67), formal education (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49–0.96), middle income (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.28–0.63), expensiveness (OR = 4.39, 95% CI: 2.49–7.76), and affordable cost (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.41–3.2) for transport were factors associated with malaria treatment delay among children.
Conclusion and recommendationsAbout one out of two parents in the Horn of Africa put off getting their kids treated for malaria. High transportation expenses, long travel times (greater than 3,000 meters) to medical facilities, and anxiety about drug side effects were major risk factors that contributed to this delay. On the other hand, a middle-class income was found to be protective of treatment delays. These results highlight how crucial it is to improve access to healthcare services, both financially and physically, to minimize delays in treating malaria in the area’s children.
Investigate the perception of male accessibility to the fields of nursing practice by those studying or teaching nursing in England.
Cross-sectional survey.
Online questionnaire with three closed-scale questions and two open-text questions designed to elicit perceptions on the accessibility of men to the fields of nursing practice. The questionnaire was distributed to the staff and students at 61 nursing schools in England. Inferential and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the closed questions data and inductive content analysis was used to analyse open-text questions data.
Students (n = 52) and staff (n = 51) responded to the survey. Adult (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) and mental health (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) were perceived as the most accessible fields of nursing practice to men, and child (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) the least. Specialised practice areas in acute and emergency (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2), education (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2), leadership (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), prison services (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and research (Mdn = 7, IQR = 2) were rated the most accessible to men and neonatal care (Mdn = 3, IQR = 3) the least. Societal stereotyping and stigma were seen as barriers to men entering the nursing profession. The perception that nursing is a feminised profession persists and a distrust of men is associated with child nursing. Men were viewed as progressing to leadership roles with greater ease than women.
Societal level stereotyping and stigma are perceived as prevalent in nursing practice areas considered less accessible to men entering the nursing profession.
This study adds insight into the gendered nature of nursing and highlights the barriers to men entering a profession with a workforce crisis.
STROBE cross-sectional studies guidelines. COREQ guidelines for content analysis.
No patient or public contribution.
Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a problem for patient safety and the sustainability of healthcare systems. Difficulties persist in their assessment, prevention and monitoring by multidisciplinary teams. International recommendations point to this problem as a priority area for resolution in terms of patient safety. Research on the subject has been positive, resulting in several guidelines for clinical practice, but professionals' adherence remains below what is expected for their implementation. This scoping review aimed to identify interventions that increase multidisciplinary teams' adherence to the prevention and management of PIs between hospitals and the communities. The search was carried out in the MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, JBI, Cochrane and grey literature databases by two independent reviewers, and led to the identification of 16 articles that met the eligibility criteria and made it possible to answer the research question. Strategies to improve adherence by health professionals include the creation and training of multidisciplinary teams, the implementation of new risk assessment models, Wound Boards, injury prevention reminders, video consultation apps, multidisciplinary rounds, documentation and recording. No studies were identified that assessed staff adherence to interventions aimed at preventing and managing PIs in the continuum between hospitals and communities, which is suggestive of the need for further research in this area.
To explore the experiences of nurses transitioning from a clinical ward to a newly established respiratory intermediate care unit (IMCU).
A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted to capture the lived experiences of redeployed nurses. This design was selected to address the research question: What are the initial experiences of nurses transitioning from general ward settings to a newly established IMCU for respiratory patients?
Two focus groups were conducted in June 2024, involving 14 purposefully selected registered nurses. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework, with the study reported in line with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.
The analysis revealed two interconnected themes reflecting the complexity of the redeployment experience. The first theme, ‘The introspection of waiting amidst change and readiness’, captures the emotional ambivalence nurses felt, characterised by anticipation, uncertainty and a perceived lack of preparedness. This phase was marked by concerns over clinical competence, fear of errors and the weight of new legal and ethical responsibilities. The second theme, ‘The road to organizational change with both driving forces and obstacles’, highlights nurses' concerns about physician readiness, feeling undervalued and limited involvement in planning. At the same time, nurses emphasised the importance of teamwork, structured preparation, experiential training and having the right equipment.
The study underscores the complexity of role transitions for nurses moving into semi-critical care settings like IMCUs. It reveals the need for targeted support strategies to reduce uncertainty and enhance role readiness.
To improve the redeployment experience and patient outcomes, healthcare organisations should prioritise structured training, tailored preceptorship programmes and inclusive decision-making processes. These measures can strengthen nurses' resilience, support workforce sustainability and ensure the delivery of high-quality, patient-centred care in intermediate care environments.
This study highlights the significant impact of inadequate preparation and communication on redeployed nurses' experiences in respiratory IMCUs, emphasising the need for structured training and supportive team dynamics. These findings can guide healthcare leaders, nurse managers and policymakers in developing evidence-based redeployment strategies that reduce anxiety, strengthen team cohesion and ultimately improve nurse adaptation and patient care in semi-critical settings.
We used the SRQR guidelines for reporting qualitative studies.
No patient or public contribution.
Although the positive correlation between self-efficacy and quality of life and the negative correlation between symptom occurrence and self-efficacy are well established in the cancer literature, the underlying mechanism, whether self-efficacy mediates the effect of symptoms on quality of life, remains unclear due to the cross-sectional design of prior studies. Longitudinal investigation is crucial for establishing the causal mechanism of self-efficacy in mitigating the adverse impact of cancer-related symptoms on quality of life.
To examine the longitudinal mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between symptom occurrence and quality of life among 534 cancer patients on treatment with moderate to high symptoms.
This is a secondary data analysis of the longitudinal mediating effect. A sample of patients with moderate to high symptoms on cancer treatments (N = 534) from a randomised controlled trial was used. We adopted a cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) approach to test the longitudinal mediating effect with three waves. The longitudinal invariance of the measurement was previously tested.
The results showed that cancer-coping self-efficacy predicted the following assessment of symptom occurrence, but not vice versa. Also, cancer-coping self-efficacy had an immediate direct impact on quality of life and the influence sustained to the following assessment. Our mediating analysis showed that cancer-coping self-efficacy totally mediated the relationship between symptom occurrence and quality of life (unstandardized β = −0.008, standardised B = −0.036, p = 0.036, CI95 = [−0.001, −0.016]).
Our findings provide initial evidence supporting the causal mechanism of cancer-coping self-efficacy in interventions that aim for symptom management and quality of life improvement.
This study is the first to test the longitudinal mediating mechanism of cancer-coping self-efficacy in the relationship between symptom occurrence and quality of life among the cancer population. Further testing using a randomised controlled trial of a specifically designed self-efficacy-enhancing intervention is needed.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore the topics and themes covered in published research studies in nursing about neurodegenerative disease, synthesise the available evidence, and discuss future directions.
Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
A multi-step search strategy was applied across different databases to identify studies published in English or Italian up to September 2023. Data were analysed using a Nursing Data Matrix based on the nursing meta-paradigm and the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) 4D-framework. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by pairs of reviewers; data were extracted and thematically analysed to identify existing research questions and potential priorities.
Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, and Embase databases were searched for studies published from 2013 to 2023.
A total of 351 studies met inclusion criteria. The majority of studies originated from the United States (35%). Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease were the most studied conditions, while rare diseases were scarcely represented. Most studies focused on nursing care (39%), with limited attention to rehabilitation (0.8%) and cost-effectiveness (1%). Although 70% of articles included at least one nurse author, 22% lacked any nursing authorship despite addressing nursing-related topics. Thematic and matrix analyses revealed an uneven distribution of research, with a predominance of descriptive studies and limited work in discovery-oriented research.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of nursing research in neurodegenerative diseases, highlighting key themes and gaps. The findings informed the preliminary identification of new nursing research priorities in neurodegenerative diseases to guide future studies and enhance evidence-based nursing care.
The study highlights key trends and gaps in nursing research on neurodegenerative diseases, calling for a more inclusive, equitable, and comprehensive research agenda.
PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Review registration was done on Open Science Framework, and can be viewed at https://osf.io/tn5v9 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TN5V9)
To identify the pain assessment scales with the best psychometric properties to be used by nurses in an inpatient setting.
Umbrella review.
A comprehensive search of four databases was conducted for systematic reviews published from July 2013 to November 2024, focusing on psychometric properties of pain scales used in inpatient settings. Inclusion criteria required scales to assess subjective or behavioural pain and be nurse-administered, while reviews without detailed psychometric data were excluded. Screening, quality appraisal (JBI checklist), and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. Data synthesis combined qualitative and quantitative approaches, with psychometric properties evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. The study was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement.
Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria, identifying 41 scales used across various patient populations, including critical care, paediatric, postoperative, cancer, cerebral palsy, disorders of consciousness, low back and neck pain, stroke and verbal communication disorders. The Paediatric Pain Profile, the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool and the Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, although the positive findings for the latter two should be confirmed by at least one additional study. Most of the scales (n = 36) require further studies to validate their use in clinical practice. For two scales, their clinical use remains questionable.
The Paediatric Pain Profile, the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool, and the Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity can be recommended for use. Unidimensional scales should complement, rather than replace, multidimensional scales to ensure a comprehensive pain assessment. Standardising documentation with validated scales enhances clinical decision-making, care quality, research usability, and reduces documentation burden.
Sweden, as many other high-income countries, has adopted guidelines to offer induction of labour at 41+0 gestational weeks to decrease the risk for perinatal death. As more than 20% of the pregnant population reach this gestational age, and along with other contributing factors, induction rates have increased up to 30% in many countries. Both women and care providers have raised the question if outpatient induction could be a convenient, safe and economic alternative, reducing the burden on inpatient care in maternity hospitals. Before introducing outpatient induction into clinical routine, studies need to assure safety for the child and woman as well as efficacy of the method.
A register-based randomised controlled multicentre non-inferiority trial to study if outpatient induction in low-risk inductions is (1) as safe for the child (perinatal composite of mortality and morbidity) and (2) as effective (proportion of vaginal deliveries) as inpatient induction at the hospital. Secondary outcomes are further health outcomes, experiences of pregnant women, partners and care providers, health economics and future pregnancy outcome. Participating women with a singleton pregnancy and unripe cervix between 37+0 and 41+6 gestational weeks planned for low-risk induction will undergo induction of labour with either a balloon catheter or oral misoprostol according to clinical practice at the study site and the woman’s informed choice. Randomisation will allocate women to either outpatient (home or patient hotel) or inpatient induction (standard care). Women undergoing outpatient induction can remain at home for up to 2 days, with an assessment after 24 hours including cardiotocography. Once active labour ensues, all women will receive standard care in the hospital.
The assessment of non-inferiority will involve a two-sided 95% CI and 80% power, requiring randomisation of 8891 women to ensure a probability of at least 0.80 that the upper limit of a two-sided 95.7% CI for a difference in the primary safety outcome is below the non-inferiority margin of 1.5%. 31 of the 45 delivery units in Sweden are currently recruiting. Data will be collected from the electronic case report form and Swedish healthcare registers. Questionnaire and qualitative interview-based studies will be performed to explore experiences of pregnant women, partners and care providers. Additionally, a health economic evaluation will be performed.
The Swedish Ethical Review Authority approved the study (3 June 2020; 2020-02675 with amendments 2021-03045, 2022-00865-02, 2023-01252-02, 2024-00560-02, 2024-2024-04597-02). The Swedish Medical Products Agency approved the study for the medication arm (25 August 2020, EudraCT number: 2020-000233-41; 5.1-2020-60240 with amendments 5.1-2022-73500, 5.1-2023-630). Due to changed regulation, in 2023, the study medication arm was transferred and approved by the European Medicines Agency (23 October 2023, EU CT Number: 2023-507164-39-00; CTIS 5.1.2-2023-099775 with amendments 5.1.2-2024-081916, 5.1.2-2025-036291). The Swedish Medical Products Agency approved the study for the medical device arm (6 April 2021, CIV-ID: CIV-20-09-034712; 5.1-2021-14812 with amendments 5.1-2022-14252, 5.1-2023-596, 5.1-2024-8886, 5.1-2024-55554). The medical device arm was transferred to Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (23 December 2024, 5.1-2025-24242 and amendment 5.1-2025-6050). The study will involve more than 80% of all delivery units in Sweden, which will allow for a smooth implementation of any new routine after the study’s conclusion. Results will be published in relevant scientific journals, presented at national and international conferences, and communicated to participants and relevant institutions through the Outpatient Induction study homepage (www.optionstudien.se), the webinars of the Swedish Network for National Clinical Studies in Obstetrics and Gynecology (
EudraCT No: 2020-000233-41, after transfer to the European Medicines Agency EU CT Number: 2023-507164-39-00; CIV-ID 20-09-034712.
The aim of this study was to explore the digital health technology readiness of nurses, nursing students, nurse-academics, and nurses in leadership roles. Workforce digital readiness impacts the adoption of digital health technologies and quality and safety outcomes. This study sought to identify key factors affecting nurses' readiness for specific digital health technologies and provide recommendations to accelerate readiness levels in alignment with rapidly advancing digital health technologies.
Cross-sectional multi-method study.
An online survey was followed by semi-structured interviews. Survey data (N = 160) were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whereas qualitative responses (N = 8 interviews, 43 open-ended responses) were thematically analysed.
Participants were confident regarding openness to innovation, reporting highest confidence Levels around telehealth, wearable devices, and information technology. The lowest confidence scores were seen in health smart homes technology, followed by health applications, social media, patient online resources, and EHRs. Four themes were developed from the qualitative interviews including ‘opportunities for efficient ways of working’, ‘digital technology turning experts into novices’, ‘disillusionment between expectation and reality’ and ‘shared responsibility for development of digital expertise’. Open-ended data was focused on the need for comprehensive education, ongoing support, and infrastructure improvements to prepare healthcare professionals for digital health environments.
Notable findings include age-related differences, the need for shared responsibility in workforce preparation, and a link between problem-solving ability and help-seeking.
Low confidence among nurses around the use of digital health technologies such as electronic health records, in-home monitoring technology, and other wearable technologies could impact adoption readiness. Because patient safety is increasingly and inextricably linked to digital health technologies, nurses must not only be digital health literate but also included in the design and implementation process of these technologies.
This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for the reporting of cross-sectional survey research, and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative (COREQ) research guidelines.
Limited patient and public involvement was incorporated, focusing on feedback from digital health researchers and practitioner-academics during the academic peer review process. Their insights informed the clarity and relevance of the survey design and data interpretation, ensuring alignment with real-world workforce development priorities in nursing.
To address the gap in existing postpartum care literature by gaining an in-depth understanding of Australian child and family health nurses' experiences of providing postpartum contraceptive care.
A qualitative exploratory study design, using semi-structured interviews.
Convenience and snowballing sampling methods were employed to recruit child and family health nurses currently practising in Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 nurses in July 2023, and data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis as outlined by Braun and Clarke. The consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research checklist were used to support the research process.
Despite their frequent contact with postpartum women and acknowledging the importance of postpartum contraceptive care, most participants did not commonly discuss contraception or family planning with mothers and did not feel it was part of their role to do so. Participants cited role ambiguity, limited knowledge of postpartum contraception, lack of clinical practice guidance, time constraints, and competing priorities as contributing to inconsistencies in postpartum contraceptive care provision.
This study highlights critical gaps in the provision of postpartum contraceptive care by child and family health nurses in Australia and underscores the need for systemic changes to promote postpartum contraceptive care as a key component of routine maternal health services.
This study provides actionable evidence for improving the delivery of postpartum contraceptive care, ensuring women are provided with accurate information about their options, and supporting contraceptive uptake to reduce the incidence of short interpregnancy intervals.
Our findings provide practical guidance relevant for healthcare policy and practice, emphasising the need to enhance child and family health nurses training in reproductive health, develop clear clinical practice guidelines, and address systemic barriers such as time constraints to improve the provision of postpartum contraceptive care and support women's reproductive health needs.
Standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR).
No patient or public contribution.
To translate, culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of Fundamentals of Care Framework and the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process.
Qualitative tool validation study.
The study followed internationally recommended procedures, including forward–backward translation, expert committee review, content validation through cognitive interviews and face validity testing with nurses and nursing students. Data were collected between January and October 2023.
Key terms were culturally and linguistically adapted to enhance clarity and contextual relevance, with changes informed by expert feedback. Content validation confirmed conceptual equivalence, and face validity testing demonstrated that Italian versions were perceived as clear, appropriate and applicable across clinical and educational settings.
Cultural adaptation of theoretical frameworks is essential for ensuring their relevance and usability in local contexts. The Italian versions of the Fundamentals of Care Framework and the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process will provide a robust, evidence-based foundation for person-centred care across education, research and clinical practice.
By making these tools accessible in Italian, this study supports the integration of fundamentals of care into national nursing education and practice, promoting international consistency in person-centred care. It lays the groundwork for curriculum reform, clinical implementation and global collaboration in nursing.
Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
This study did not involve any patient or public contribution.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05177627
Dementia resulting from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complications significantly impacts older adults' quality of life, increasing suffering for both patients and their families. Numerous studies have identified self-management as a key factor in adopting appropriate health behaviors to prevent diabetes-related complications. However, internationally, there is insufficient empirical evidence for individual and family process factors predicting dementia prevention behaviors in older adults with T2DM. Therefore, we aimed to explore how dementia-preventive self-management behaviors (outcome dimension) are related to contextual and process dimensions based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory (IFSMT).
A cross-sectional observational study.
The 444 older adults with T2DM from six community hospitals in Chiang Mai completed valid and reliable self-reported measures, including a Socio-demographic Questionnaire, the Dementia Prevention of Individual and Family Self-Management Process Questionnaire (DP-IFSM-PQ), and the Dementia Preventive Self-Management Behavior Questionnaire (DPSMBQ). Data were analyzed using bivariate correlations, partial correlations, and multivariate linear regression with the stepwise method.
Most participants exhibited high levels of individual and family self-management processes and dementia-preventive self-management behaviors. Bivariate and partial correlation analyses revealed a significant association between DP-IFSM-PQ and DPSMBQ scores. Stepwise multiple linear regression identified self-efficacy, a subdomain of DP-IFSM-PQ, as the strongest predictor of DPSMBQ scores. Other significant predictors included awareness of dementia prevention among family members, neighbors, and the community; family income sufficiency; history of comorbidities; distance to the hospital; and knowledge and beliefs (a subdomain of the DP-IFSM-PQ). The regression model was statistically significant (F [1, 437] = 46.662, p = 0.000, Adjusted R 2 = 0.382).
Self-efficacy and knowledge and beliefs, based on IFSMT, are key predictors of dementia-preventive behaviors among older adults with T2DM. These predictors could be used as potential intervention components in a subsequent co-design study for promoting dementia preventive self-management behaviors in older adults with T2DM. The results also reinforce the importance of family members and healthcare providers in supporting older adults with T2DM to enhance their dementia prevention behaviors.
To examine how family caregivers of deceased nursing home residents scored and justified their ratings for each item on the Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care scale and to identify the consistencies and discrepancies between their perceptions and the scores assigned when assessing the residents' end-of-life experience.
A convergent mixed-methods design, comprising a cross-sectional study and a thematic analysis for quantitative and qualitative phases, respectively.
Quantitative and qualitative data were collected simultaneously between May 2018 and February 2019. The two sets of data were analysed separately. For the quantitative component, family caregivers completed the quality of dying in long-term care scale and a single-item question assessing the final month of the residents' life. Descriptive statistics, Mann–Whitney U-tests for comparative analyses and Spearman's correlations were applied to the quantitative data, while deductive thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews.
Sixty-nine family caregivers completed the QoD-LTC, and 11 participated in qualitative interviews. The mean overall QoD-LTC score was 39.29 (SD = 7.58). The highest-rated domain was ‘Personhood’ (M = 4.32; SD = 0.68), while the lowest was ‘Preparatory Tasks’ (M = 2.66; SD = 1.26). Interviewed family caregivers reported effective management of pain and other symptoms, satisfaction with the care provided and respectful and appropriate treatment. However, they identified significant shortcomings in communication concerning end-of-life issues, coping with death and advance care planning. Residents with cognitive impairment had significantly lower scores on the ‘closure’ (p < 0.01) and ‘preparatory tasks’ (p = 0.03) domains as well as on the overall QoD-LTC score (p = 0.01).
The findings demonstrate consistency between the quantitative and qualitative data, with high scores reported across most domains of the QoD-LTC scale, with the exception of the ‘Preparatory Tasks’ domain. Cognitive impairment among residents was associated with lower perceived quality of the dying process from the perspective of family members.
Aspects related to closure and preparatory tasks were often overlooked. Strategies to enhance end-of-life communication and advance care planning are needed.
The study adhered to the EQUATOR guidelines. The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences (MMR-RHS) checklist for mixed-methods studies, the STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies, and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines for qualitative studies were used for reporting.
No funding was received for the completion of this study.
Juan Daniel Suárez-Máximo escribe una reseña sobre el capitulo 2 del libro de Marilyn R. McFarland, Hiba B. Wehbe-Alamah “Leininger's Culture Care Diversity and Universality A Worldwide Nursing Theory”, de la editorial Jones & Bartlett Learning, con la fecha de publicación del 2014.
by Ana Paula Cândido Oliveira, Daniela Alencar Vieira, Cristiane Wanderley Cardoso, Tereza Magalhães, Rosangela Oliveira Anjos, Eduardo José Farias Borges Reis, Kionna Oliveira Bernardes Santos, Guilherme Sousa Ribeiro
Work ability is a subjective concept that reflects the balance between an individual’s perception of the physical, mental, and social demands of work and their competence and resources to meet those demands. The COVID-19 crisis significantly impacted health, work, and socioeconomic conditions worldwide. However, few studies have examined work ability in disadvantaged urban communities during this period. To analyze factors associated with work ability within the context of social vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a cross-sectional study in a low-income neighborhood in Salvador, Brazil, between February and June 2022. Sociodemographic, health, and labor data were collected, and work ability was assessed using the Work Ability Index (WAI), a widely used tool for evaluating work ability. Multivariable analyses based on a hierarchical model were run to investigate factors associated with low WAI scores. The study included 292 workers aged ≥16 years (59.6% women; median age 41 years). Most workers (84.6%) were classified as having adequate work ability based on their WAI scores. Multivariable analyses found that inadequate work ability was more frequent among women (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-3.48), individuals who self-rated their health as moderate/good (PR: 5.91; 95% CI: 1.45-24.05) or poor/very poor (PR: 21.62; 95% CI: 5.14-90.91) compared to those with excellent/very good health, and those reporting diabetes (PR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.13-3.9). Working >40 hours per week (PR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.28-0.96) was negatively associated with inadequate work ability, suggesting that individuals with adequate work ability may be selected for longer working hours. A history of COVID-19 was not associated with inadequate work ability. These findings suggest that targeted interventions to improve work ability in low-income communities should prioritize women and workers with chronic health conditions, such as diabetes.Advanced simulation is a methodology that allows the development of technical skills and transversal skills such as teamwork and leadership. There are tools to measure the development of technical competencies and student satisfaction with the methodology, but not to measure the development and use of transversal competencies in the clinical practice setting.
To develop and validate a scale to measure the impact of clinical simulation on the development and application of teamwork and leadership competencies.
A multicentre study was carried out in two Spanish universities in which the Clinical Simulation Learning Teamwork and Leadership Scale was developed and validated.
The study was carried out in several phases: development of the questionnaire using a Delphi method, pilot test and validation of the construct with a sample of 207 nursing students. Reporting of this research adheres to STROBE guidelines.
Content validity was checked according to Aiken's V for the three attributes of the questionnaire. Reliability or internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's α and the sensitivity analysis showed no significant variation when any item was eliminated. On the other hand, McDonald's Omega statistic was used. Intraobserver reliability was taken from a sample of 47 students, in which it was observed that the intraclass correlation was positive.
The Clinical Simulation Learning teamwork and leadership scale is a valid instrument for measuring the development of transversal competencies.
This scale will provide information to evaluate the weight of the clinical simulation in the students' knowledge.
It is a tool for evaluating transversal skills that is proven valid and will improve the training of students.
The instructions of the STROBE checklist have been followed.
The students have participated in the knowledge transfer self-assessment.
Turnover intention among nurses is a well-established predictor of actual turnover. Despite the critical nursing shortages during COVID-19, the relative contributions of individual and organisational factors to increased turnover intention remain insufficiently understood.
This study aimed to identify the determinants of turnover intention among clinical nurses at both individual and organisational levels and to evaluate the independent effects of these factors in infectious situations.
This study conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data collected in Hong Kong between April 2020 and September 2021.
A convenience sample of 188 Chinese registered nurses in Hong Kong was recruited. The survey assessed questions on demographic, organisational and workplace violence-related characteristics, the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version, the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory and the Anticipated Turnover Scale. Univariable and structured multi-phase linear regression analyses were performed to identify associated factors and to evaluate the influence of individual- and organisational-level factors. The study followed the STROBE checklist for reporting cross-sectional studies.
The regression model, incorporating individual- and organisational-level factors, explained 22.68% of the variance in turnover intention. Individual-level factors associated with increased turnover intention included younger age, high levels of post-traumatic stress symptoms and low use of accommodation coping strategies. Organisational-level factors included exposure to workplace violence and insufficient support for reporting such incidents.
This study underscores the significance of minimising workplace violence and enhancing workplace safety, in addition to addressing individual-level factors, to reduce nurses' turnover intention—particularly in the context of future pandemics and epidemics.
These findings provide insights into the factors influencing clinical nurses' turnover intention, supporting the development and implementation of targeted clinical protocols and regulations to address modifiable factors and promote a sustainable nursing workforce.
No patient or public contribution.
Functional tests commonly assess athletes' readiness to return to sports after knee surgery. Despite this, there are still more studies on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine differences and combinations of various functional performances within and between athletes 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstruction (ACLR) for the first time (ACLR-I group) versus second ACL injury on the same knee (ACLR-II group) versus ACLR procedures on both legs (ACLR-III group). A total of 88 patients with ACLR performed single-leg hop (maximum forward distance hop, SLH; side hop > 40 cm in 30 s, SH), Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and dynamic postural balance (Y Balance Test – YBT). Data were recorded during return-to-sport testing (6 months post-surgery). For each variable, a mixed-model analysis of variance, with a between-subjects factor of group (primary ACL injury, recurrent ACL injury and bilateral ACL injury) and a within-subjects factor of limb (involved, uninvolved), were conducted. Differences between the groups were found in different degrees of inter-limb asymmetry in the single-leg hop (p < 0.001) and side hop test (p < 0.02). There was a main effect of limb for the anterior and posteromedial YBT distances, and the single-leg hop and side hop test distances (p ≤ 0.04). For each variable, performance was worse for the involved limb compared to the uninvolved limb. Individuals after recurrent ACLR showed greater functional asymmetries at 6 months of treatment. Jumping tests detected greater performance deficits compared to YBT and FMS.
FreshRSS 