Disasters can have a disproportionate impact on highly vulnerable hospitalised patients. Managers preparing hospital networks for disasters play an important role in enhancing networks’ readiness by creating disaster plans and imparting that knowledge through training and simulation exercises. The objective of this research was to uncover how those working in disaster preparedness roles in Australian hospital networks perceived the challenges that they face while ensuring adequate preparation for disasters.

A qualitative study design was employed which involved purposive sampling of Australian hospital network professionals responsible for disaster preparedness. Thematic analysis of data collected through individual online interviews generated prominent challenges of disaster preparedness in Australian hospital networks.

Local hospital networks across Australia

Twenty-six disaster preparedness managers, including hospital executives, disaster managers, emergency management coordinators and business continuity managers from 23 hospital networks located in five Australian states and one territory, participated in semi-structured online interviews. Interview transcripts were coded through an iterative inductive thematic analysis process to synthesise the predominant challenges faced by these participants when preparing their hospital networks for disasters.

Participants reported four challenges: staff’s limited interest in preparedness, budgetary constraints, staffing issues and ambiguous relationships with state and national health departments. They also presented four related solutions: capitalising on interest after disasters, attracting funding with evidence from prior disasters, facilitating staff’s availability for disaster training and specifying network-government relationships for accountability.

Disasters, although infrequent, are known to occur and can be catastrophic, yet those working in hospital network disaster preparedness roles encounter limited availability of wider staff for training and low interest in disaster planning. The sudden onset of a disaster can take a heavy toll on patients if hospitals’ staff are not sufficiently trained in disaster response or are not aware of the disaster plan. By identifying the perceptions of managers to disaster preparedness, this research presents specific challenges that hospital networks can address to improve awareness and preparation.

This study aimed to explore perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative’s (PIC’s) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) among clinicians, with a focus on awareness, frequency of use, applicability and areas for improvement.

Cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured interviews.

Clinicians working in all Australian states and territories. Recruitment was via non-probability convenience sampling. Invitations to participate in the online survey were posted on national- and state-level paediatric organisations, networks and groups. Survey participants could express interest in taking part in a follow-up online interview.

A total of 466 clinicians, including consultants/specialists (46.1%), specialists in training (residents/registrars: 20.4%), nurses (17.8%), allied health professionals (4.7%) and general practitioners (3.6%) participated in the survey. Findings indicated a high level of usage, with two-thirds of participants (63.9%) using the guidelines weekly. Most participants (91.8%) deemed the CPGs highly applicable to their practice settings, and over half (57.9%) had referred to more than 10 different PIC CPGs in the past month. Patterns of use reflected experience, seniority and scope of practice, with utilisation significantly higher among specialists in training, those working in emergency settings and those with less practising experience. Ten clinicians were interviewed to gain deeper insights, reinforcing that PIC CPGs serve multiple purposes, such as to check practice and for self-learning, for teaching more junior staff, and to reinforce treatment decisions with parents and patients. The guidelines were noted as being useful for all members of the multidisciplinary team in providing consistent language and uniform care. Key areas for improvement included enhancing accessibility in time-pressured environments, such as incorporating human factors-based navigation features and standardised layouts, and integrating additional tools and localised referral information.

PIC CPGs are viewed as a source of credible, evidence-based information that was valued across medical, nursing and allied health professionals.