Conectar
Migrants are vulnerable to structural barriers that compromise their health status and simultaneously decrease their access to healthcare, including palliative care. Literature on palliative care access in migrant populations is limited by a focus on migration to high-income countries; under-representation of refugees, asylum seekers and migrant workers; and no investigation of intersectional factors. We seek to conduct a scoping review of palliative care utilisation in migrant populations, including both academic and grey literature, including articles from low- to middle-income countries and about refugees, asylum seekers and migrant workers. The review will map out what is already known and what remains unknown about palliative care utilisation in migrants; identify the factors associated with palliative care utilisation; and determine the extent to which intersectionality has been examined.
This scoping review will adhere to the methodological framework developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute, and reporting will be in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines. A search strategy developed by a health sciences librarian will be conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO in addition to grey literature sources up to 7 July 2025. Articles will be included if they studied migrant populations and reported on palliative care utilisation. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts and review full texts. Data extraction will be performed independently and in duplicate using a standardised, pilot-tested form. Findings will be synthesised thematically, with particular attention to countries of destination, migrant subgroups and intersectional factors.
Since this is a scoping review and uses only previously published data, it does not require approval by a research ethics board. Findings will be disseminated as an abstract for presentation at a palliative care conference and a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Open Science Framework (gy75v).
To introduce a novel conceptual framework that differentiates peripheral intravenous catheters according to their dwell time and therapeutic purpose, in order to improve the suitability of material choice, safety and cost-effectiveness.
Concept based on clinical guidelines, expert consensus and recent peer-reviewed evidence.
A literature search was conducted in PubMed on November 25, 2024, using defined keywords related to peripheral intravenous catheters, device complications and duration of use. This search was supplemented by manual screening of references from relevant articles.
The analysis followed the SANRA quality criteria for narrative reviews. Evidence and recommendations from clinical guidelines, randomised trials and qualitative studies were synthesised using the Australian Clinical Care Standards to structure the proposed classification into ‘procedural’ and ‘therapy’ catheters.
Procedural catheters are used for less than 24 h, typically during procedures or short treatments, and are mainly linked to immediate risks like insertion failure and local trauma. Therapy catheters, defined as devices used beyond 24 h or expected to remain while the patient sleeps, carry cumulative risks, including delayed complications such as phlebitis, occlusion and infection. The framework supports more nuanced decisions on device choice, insertion site and maintenance.
This framework introduces a practical differentiation between short- and longer-term peripheral venous catheters, addressing a major oversight in existing guidelines and supporting context-sensitive vascular access decisions.
Tailoring catheter management to expected dwell time may reduce complications and costs, enhance workflow, and improve patient comfort.
By addressing the lack of temporal distinction in current practice, this framework offers a simple yet transformative tool applicable across care settings, with the potential to improve patient outcomes, resource utilisation and costs.
This project is a concept analyses; no patient or public contribution was necessary.
FreshRSS 