Conectar
Potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) in older adults, such as long-term use of benzodiazepines, proton pump inhibitors without indication or antipsychotics in dementia, are associated with adverse events and increased healthcare utilisation. Despite clinical guidelines discouraging their use, PIPs remain frequent in primary care. An audit and feedback (A&F) intervention of PIPs to general practitioners (GPs), led by pharmacists, may reduce the prescription of PIPs in primary care.
A two-arm, pragmatic, controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an A&F-based intervention and a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce the proportion of patients aged ≥65 years receiving inappropriate prescriptions. A total of 170 participating GPs, 85 per group, are required. GPs will be randomised into intervention or control groups (1:1). The intervention includes feedback reports, pharmacist-led academic detailing and access to online training modules. The primary outcome is the proportion of older adults receiving at least one PIP at 12 months as well as the total number of PIPs. A random effects Tobit regression model, censored at 0 and 100, will be used to estimate between-group differences adjusted for baseline prescribing. Subgroup analyses will explore heterogeneity of effect by baseline prescribing level and healthcare region. Implementation outcomes, including reach, fidelity, engagement and maintenance, will be evaluated using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, combining quantitative and qualitative data.
Ethical approval was obtained by the Balearic Island Committee Ethics (IB5219/23PI). Study findings, including primary and secondary outcomes and qualitative implementation results, will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and stakeholder reports.
by Ariene Silva do Carmo, Paulo César Pereira de Castro Júnior, Thais Cristina Marquezine Caldeira, Daniela Silva Canella, Rafael Moreira Claro, Luiza Delazari Borges, Larissa Loures Mendes
The present study analyzed the prices of food sold in canteens of Brazilian private schools and described price-based marketing strategies, according to the NOVA food classification system. This is a mixed methods study combining a cross-sectional component and time series analysis, with data from 2,241 canteens in private elementary and secondary schools in the 26 capitals of Brazil and the Federal District, collected between June 2022 and June 2024. Price data collected for unprocessed, minimally processed, or processed foods and culinary preparations based on these foods (UMPCP), and ultra-processed foods and culinary preparations based on these foods (UpCP) sold in school canteens and from the National System of Consumer Price Indices (SNIPC), were used to create a data set containing deflated monthly prices for food and beverages sold between August 2022 and July 2024. Calculations were made for adjusted prices (R$/100 g or ml) and absolute prices (R$ per portion), and frequency of use of strategies such as combos and promotions. UMPCP showed lower adjusted price, but higher absolute price than UpCP, especially for solid foods. About 27% of the study canteens implemented pricing strategies for both food groups. Most of these strategies did not exclusively favor healthy foods, indicating that promotions and combos were used without distinction. The affordability of healthy foods is disadvantaged in school canteens when considering the price per portion, which may negatively influence students’ food choices. The findings show that current prices for food sold in most canteens discourage the purchase of healthy items, but favor the purchase of unhealthy ones. These results reinforce the importance of interventions for promoting healthy foods and making them more affordable.This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for trials evaluating the effects of complementary therapies in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). We sought to identify the outcomes most relevant to pwMS, their relatives and friends, healthcare professionals and researchers and to propose these for inclusion in future trials.
A participatory international research project using a mixed-method approach with qualitative and quantitative methods. The study included a scoping review and a national survey in Switzerland to identify candidate outcomes, followed by an international COS survey to rate the importance of these outcomes. The final phases involved two consensus meetings to refine and finalise the COS.
Data were sourced from the published literature and input from international stakeholders.
pwMS and other relevant stakeholders, including their relatives and friends, healthcare professionals and researchers.
A total of 770 individuals participated in the international COS survey of 39 candidate outcomes (662 pwMS, 27 relatives/friends, 58 healthcare professionals and 23 researchers). According to the survey results, 13 outcomes were added to the COS, 5 were excluded and 21 were classified as ‘no consensus’. 13 individuals (six pwMS, one pwMS’s friend, three healthcare professionals and three researchers) attended the first consensus meeting. Following the voting on the outcomes without consensus, seven outcomes were added to the COS, four were excluded and 10 outcomes were still classified as ‘no consensus’. The six members of the stakeholders advisory board (one pwMS, four healthcare professionals and two researchers) attended the second consensus meeting to define the final COS. Nine additional outcomes were included in the COS. Sexual problems, an outcome previously excluded, were also added. In total, 30 outcomes were included in the final COS.
We have developed the first COS for future trials of complementary therapies for pwMS. The use of this COS will promote that future research in complementary therapies is relevant for pwMS and other stakeholders involved in MS care. Future COS research should integrate diverse geographical regions, where perspectives and access to complementary therapies may vary.
FreshRSS 