FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Association between older patients receiving geriatric co-management at the emergency department and acute hospital admissions compared to usual care: an observational, controlled study in the Netherlands

Por: Hogervorst · V. M. · Ribbink · M. · van Eekelen · R. · Buurman · B. M. · De Jonghe · A. · Macneil Vroomen · J. L.
Objectives

The aim of this study is to determine if a geriatric co-management model, referred to as ‘The Geriatric Emergency Medicine (GEM)-team’ is associated with less admissions to hospital in older patients compared with the usual care without increasing the risk of mortality or 30-day emergency department (ED) readmissions.

Design

This observational, controlled study used 18-month data prospectively collected from hospital records. Inverse probability weighting was used to account for baseline differences.

Setting

An ED at a suburban Dutch general hospital, receiving approximately 10 000 patients aged 70 or older per year.

Participants

All patients aged 70 or older were screened according to predefined criteria. When positively screened patients were presented at the ED on weekdays between 09:00–17:00, they received geriatric co-management. Outside these hours and when the capacity of the GEM team was reached, patients received care as usual.

Interventions

Geriatric co-management at the ED involves a geriatric multidisciplinary team in collaboration with the primary ED physician who share management and responsibility for the provided medical treatment and nursing care starting directly at the primary assessment.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was hospital admission and secondary outcomes were the composite outcome of 30-day ED readmissions and mortality.

Results

Patients receiving geriatric co-management (n=972) had lower odds for hospitalisation (OR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.91) compared with the control group (n=1355) while 30-day ED readmissions and mortality did not differ between groups (OR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.36).

Conclusions

Geriatric co-management at the ED is associated with decreased hospital admissions while 30-day ED readmissions or mortality was not impacted. These preliminary results contribute to the evidence that geriatric co-management may be an effective intervention for older patients with frailty at the ED.

Organising Nurse Work Environments: (Reshaped) Roles of Nursing Teams—A Qualitative Descriptive Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore how nursing teams (co)organise their work environment by going beyond caregiving.

Design

A descriptive qualitative study with a phenomenological approach.

Methods

Semi-structured group interviews were conducted in 2022 with nurses and managers from 18 nursing teams in a general hospital located in the Netherlands. In each group interview, 2–3 participants per team took part. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

The analysis identified four main themes contributing to a more supportive work environment: (1) embracing diversity, (2) stretching nursing roles, (3) raising voices, and (4) aligning nurses and managers. These themes show how nursing teams go beyond caregiving and actively shape and co–organise their work environment.

Conclusion

Teams that extend their roles create more supportive work environments, enhancing patient care and professional development. These findings contribute to the understanding of organising professionalism in nursing and provide insights for nursing teams striving to improve their work environments.

Implications for the Profession

Nursing teams can use the four themes—as team features—to reflect upon their organising roles and engagement with their work environment. Our findings offer practical insights for nurses with responsibilities in areas such as team development and leadership. They can focus on team diversity, voicing, stretching roles, and organisational alignment, and facilitate their teams to become more assertive.

Reporting Method

The Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guideline was followed.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public involvement.

❌