To identify factors that improve retention in under-doctored areas that experience difficulties in maintaining sufficient medical workforce.
Qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews, collected as part of a larger study.
Four purposely sampled geographic case study sites in England. Three case study sites were selected as areas that struggled to recruit and retain doctors and one as an area that is oversubscribed. This comprised 27 NHS Trusts, plus 1449 GP practices.
100 National Health Service (NHS)-employed doctors (including general practitioners, consultant specialists, specialty and specialist doctors, resident doctors/doctors in postgraduate training and locally employed doctors) were interviewed between December 2022 and March 2024.
Participants shared their experiences of organisational levers that impact on decisions about working life and retention in the workforce. Two key themes explained factors influencing retention. First, participants discussed feeling valued by the organisation, both in terms of material circumstances and in relationships with colleagues. Second, the theme of autonomy and opportunity explored why doctors chose to stay in areas that typically experience difficulties in maintaining sufficient staffing.
Many studies focusing on workforce examine why staff leave, but by focusing on factors that influence retention, greater understanding of specific facets of organisational culture can be used to inform policy and practice.
Early MRI use varies in the management of acute wrist injuries in the UK, with only a minority of National Health Service (NHS) centres being able to offer this to patients. In this study, we aim to explore the perspectives of staff and patients on the use of early MRI in the management of wrist injuries.
This is a cross-sectional qualitative study using semistructured, face-to-face and remote interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
10 NHS Trusts in the UK.
We interviewed a sample consisting of 37 NHS staff members and 21 patients.
We analysed the data into three overarching themes. The first theme described the negative impact of wrist injuries on both staff and patients. Staff reported an uncomfortable feeling that they had ‘short-changed’ patients with older non-MRI based pathways, and that the consequences of missing a scaphoid fracture could be a ‘horrible thing’ for patients. The second theme described how early MRI was perceived as a ‘win for everyone’. For patients, the win encompassed the relief of a speedy diagnosis which helped them to get better. Staff saw early MRI as a win because it ‘revolutionised care’ and ‘reduced the clinic footprint’. The final theme defined the key ingredients of delivering an early MRI pathway: a simple pathway with clear accountability, timely access to MRI and prompt reporting of results, a safe pathway with safety nets to avoid patients being lost, data and audit of the time to MRI and definitive treatment, bottom-up engagement, clear communication and looking after your team.
Our findings contribute to a better understanding of stakeholders’ perspectives on wrist injury pathways in the UK NHS.
Airway management describes a range of commonly performed procedures undertaken to enable invasive respiratory support for patients. Studies of airway management interventions report heterogeneous outcomes, impeding evidence synthesis and translation of findings into clinical practice. A core outcome set is a consensus-based standardised minimum collection of outcomes to be reported in a given area of healthcare. The Airway Terminology and Outcome Measures project aims to define a core outcome set and select outcome measurement instruments for future airway management research.
Following a systematic literature search, we generated a list of candidate outcomes by extracting outcomes and their measurement instruments from a random sample of included studies until saturation was reached and no new outcomes emerged. The search resulted in a long list of 64 outcomes for inclusion in the consensus building stage. Key stakeholders, including patients, clinicians and researchers, will be invited to participate in a multiround modified Delphi process and a panel meeting to finalise the core outcome set and agree to their measurement instruments.
The study was approved by the Health Research Authority and the London – Fulham Research Ethics Committee (24/LO/0544). All participants will provide informed consent. Study findings will be presented as conference proceedings and published in peer-reviewed medical journals.
20 November 2024
COMET 3146