This systematic review aims to update and analyse patient perceptions of physician attire, focusing on its impact on the physician–patient relationship across different medical settings and specialties.

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria.

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies from 1 January 2015 to 1 June 2025.

This review examined studies focused on physician attire and its impact on patient perceptions.

Studies were assessed based on authors, study setting, study design, objective, study population, physician specialty, measures, findings, main conclusion and risk of bias. Then, thematic analysis was employed to synthesise the findings of the articles.

28 studies met the inclusion criteria. Patient preferences for physician attire varied significantly by clinical context, medical specialty and physician gender. In outpatient and primary care settings, mixed evidence was reported, with some studies suggesting that a combination of casual attire and white coats may foster approachability and communication, while others showed no clear preference. In contrast, in high-acuity settings such as emergency rooms and operating theatres, scrubs were consistently favoured, indicating moderate to strong evidence for the association with professionalism and preparedness. During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients expressed stronger preferences for scrubs and PPE, emphasising infection prevention and hygiene. Gender-specific findings indicated that male physicians were perceived as more professional when wearing formal attire with white coats, while female physicians in similar attire were often misidentified as nurses or assistants. Specialty-based differences were also observed, with preferences for white coats in dermatology, neurosurgery and ophthalmology, while scrubs were preferred in anaesthesiology and gastroenterology.

This study demonstrates that physician attire consistently and significantly impacts patients’ perceptions of professionalism, trust and communication. The collective findings provide robust evidence that these perceptions are highly context-dependent, necessitating adaptable dress codes tailored to clinical environments and patient expectations to enhance trust and patient satisfaction.

https://osf.io/kjr4p

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is the most prevalent non-haematological, dose-limiting adverse event associated with platinum derivatives and taxanes. Currently, no effective prophylactic interventions for CIPN have been established. However, several studies have shown that acupuncture may alleviate symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, proposing it as a potentially effective strategy for CIPN prevention. This pilot trial will help determine the feasibility and efficacy of acupuncture for preventing CIPN. The results will provide valuable insights for designing a larger clinical trial and conducting power calculations.

This is a randomised sham-controlled trial. A cohort of 60 patients scheduled to receive chemotherapy will be enrolled and randomly assigned to either the electroacupuncture group or the sham acupuncture group. Eligible patients will receive nine treatment sessions administered over the course of three chemotherapy cycles. The primary outcome is the change in CIPN-related quality of life (QOL) measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) CIPN20 from baseline to the end of cycle three. Secondary outcomes include: neurotoxicity symptoms assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale, incidence of CIPN, chemotherapy status, insomnia symptoms measured by the Insomnia Severity Index, depression symptoms evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory-II, anxiety symptoms assessed with the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and fatigue symptoms measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Adverse events will be meticulously recorded.

The study protocol (V.1.0, 29 July 2024) has been approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (2024-KY-0853–001). All patients will provide oral informed consent and written informed consent before participating in this study. Trial results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

ITMCTR2024000390 (International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry, http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/zh-CN/Home/ProjectView?pid=16387992-8971-4218-9cd0-b623af91f9f3), registered on 3 September 2024.

Insomnia, a prevalent sleep disorder, significantly impacts individuals' physical and mental well-being. Despite conventional treatments, some patients experience persistent insomnia. Acupuncture, a safe complementary therapy, has been demonstrated to be effective in treating insomnia. Meridian differentiation can enhance acupuncture efficacy by enabling individualised diagnosis. Previous clinical research has indicated that meridian differentiation acupuncture (MA), based on objective data, can notably enhance sleep quality in patients with intractable insomnia. However, small sample sizes and a lack of objective measures necessitate further investigation. Therefore, we plan to conduct a large-scale, multicentre clinical trial to validate its efficacy.

We propose a multicentre, single-blind, randomised, sham acupuncture (SA)-controlled trial involving 489 participants with intractable insomnia. Patients will be randomly assigned to three groups at a 1:1:1 ratio: the MA group, the conventional acupuncture group and the SA group. We will assess Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, actigraphy, sleep diary, Insomnia Traditional Chinese Medicine Symptom Scale scores, Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety scores and meridian imbalance values at baseline, after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment, and at two follow-up periods (8 weeks and 12 weeks postbaseline). The intention-to-treat principle will be applied to analyse the data, observe differences between meridian differentiation acupuncture, CA and SA in improving outcomes related to intractable insomnia.

The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2024HL-002) and the ethics committees of other participating institutions. Each participant must provide their written informed consent form before enrolling in this study, and consent can be withdrawn at any stage. On completion of the study, the results will be published in a journal or made available by contacting the corresponding author via email.

This study protocol was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 22 April 2024 (ChiCTR2400083323).