This study analysed the clinical outcomes and healthcare costs associated with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) within a tertiary healthcare centre in Singapore.

This is a retrospective, single-centre study. Patient data were extracted from the hospital’s electronic health system, including demographic, clinical and hospitalisation information. Hospitalisation costs were categorised into DFU-related and other hospitalisation costs. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to estimate the total healthcare costs associated with DFU.

Tertiary centre within a population suffering from a diabetic epidemic.

All patients aged 18 years or older who received DFU treatment between January 2019 and December 2023 at the Singapore General Hospital were included.

A total of 2857 DFU patients were included in the study. In-hospital mortality remained stable at 5%–6% annually. Among the cohort, 39.1% underwent minor amputations, 19.6% had major amputations and 9.0% experienced both minor and major amputations. The median length of stay for surgical patients ranged from 10 (IQR 4–24) to 13 days (IQR 6–31), compared with 4 (IQR 2–8) to 5 (IQR 3–9.5) days for non-surgical patients. Total costs per admission for patients with DFU-related surgery ranged from US$28 588.96 to US$34 204.77, while for those without surgery, costs ranged from US$6637.59 to US$7955.23. Total hospitalisation costs for DFU during the study period ranged from US$65.87 million to US$72.16 million. All figures were inflation adjusted to 2023 US dollars.

DFU poses a significant clinical and economic burden in Singapore. Understanding the costs associated with DFU is essential for resource allocation and planning in DFU management.

To assess the preliminary effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a culturally tailored, music-based broadcast intervention delivered through schools and community radio to improve referral adherence among schoolchildren to inform the need for a definitive trial.

Pilot randomised interventional study.

18 schools across Unguja and Pemba islands, Zanzibar.

Schoolchildren (6–18 years old) who failed vision screening and were referred for care recruited from January to February 2024. The registered sample size reflects the full cohort, including children and adults. This manuscript reports on the child cohort only, as per the predefined analysis plan.

Group 1 received 3 months of school-based broadcasts of culturally tailored 3–6 min songs (played three times daily on 2 days per week), followed by 3 months of community radio broadcasts of additional songs (3–6 min, aired three times daily); Group 2 received the community broadcasts during the same period as Group 1.

The primary outcome was change in referral adherence assessed at two time points: 3 months after school broadcast and 3 months after community broadcast, expressed in difference-in-difference estimates and effect sizes. Secondary outcomes included reporting of adverse events and contamination, and cost-effectiveness calculated as cost per child reached and cost per referred child accessed care in study groups and combined intervention.

374 children were referred to eye care services, including 246 in Group 1 and 128 in Group 2. Referral adherence was 69.8% in Group 1 and 42.9% in Group 2 (p=0.0006). The school broadcast phase yielded an effect size of 0.26 and a cost of US$4.65 per referred child accessing services. The community broadcast produced an effect size of 0.21, with a cost of US$0.29 per person reached. The combined intervention reached individuals at a cost of US$0.37 per person. No adverse event and contamination was reported.

A combined school and community broadcast intervention improved referral adherence in this pilot trial, with evidence of cost-effectiveness. These findings support the conduct of a fully powered definitive trial.

NCT06469697.

In 2022, the WHO conditionally recommended the use of treatment decision algorithms (TDAs) for treatment decision-making in children

Within the Decide-TB project (PACT ID: PACTR202407866544155, 23 July 2024), we aim to generate an individual-participant dataset (IPD) from prospective TB diagnostic accuracy cohorts (RaPaed-TB, UMOYA and two cohorts from TB-Speed). Using the IPD, we aim to: (1) assess the diagnostic accuracy of published TDAs using a set of consensus case definitions produced by the National Institute of Health as reference standard (confirmed and unconfirmed vs unlikely TB); (2) evaluate the added value of novel tools (including biomarkers and artificial intelligence-interpreted radiology) in the existing TDAs; (3) generate an artificial population, modelling the target population of children eligible for WHO-endorsed TDAs presenting at primary and secondary healthcare levels and assess the diagnostic accuracy of published TDAs and (4) identify clinical predictors of radiological disease severity in children from the study population of children with presumptive TB.

This study will externally validate the first data-driven WHO TDAs in a large, well-characterised and diverse paediatric IPD derived from four large paediatric cohorts of children investigated for TB. The study has received ethical clearance for sharing secondary deidentified data from the ethics committees of the parent studies (RaPaed-TB, UMOYA and TB Speed) and as the aims of this study were part of the parent studies’ protocols, a separate approval was not necessary. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at local, regional and international scientific meetings and conferences. This database will serve as a catalyst for the assessment of the inclusion of novel tools and the generation of an artificial population to simulate the impact of novel diagnostic pathways for TB in children at lower levels of healthcare. TDAs have the potential to close the diagnostic gap in childhood TB. Further finetuning of the currently available algorithms will facilitate this and improve access to care.

Paediatric hospitalisation, encompassing the period from admission to discharge, often involves feelings of pain, fear and anxiety, primarily due to clinical diagnoses and, more significantly, discomfort and stress-inducing procedures. Numerous methodologies and interventions have been investigated and implemented to alleviate these phenomena during paediatric hospitalisation. Virtual reality (VR), for example, has demonstrated efficacy in pain relief for hospitalised children in recent studies. This systematic review, therefore, aims to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of VR in alleviating pain, fear and anxiety in hospitalised children undergoing painful procedures.

This systematic review and meta-analysis will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols guidelines. A systematic search will be conducted in March and April 2025 across the following databases, with no restrictions on language or publication year: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies will include randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials involving children (aged 2–10 years) and adolescents (aged 10–18 years) who received VR interventions during painful procedures. Data will be managed and analysed using Review Manager software (RevMan 5.2.3). In cases of significant heterogeneity (I² > 50%), a random-effects model will be employed to combine studies and calculate the OR with a 95% CI. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the certainty of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.

This study will solely review published data; thus, ethical approval is not required. This systematic review is expected to provide subsidies, evidence and insights into the use of VR. It is also anticipated that the results will directly impact the improvement of care for these patients and the qualification of professional care.

CRD42024568297.

Acute pain in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery is mostly treated with opioid analgesics. However, with the risk of adverse reactions and complications, strategies which do not involve opioid analgesics can be considered, such as aromatherapy. This systematic review aims to analyse the effectiveness of aromatherapy in relieving pain in post-cardiac surgery patients.

Two researchers will independently and simultaneously conduct searches and select studies from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane (Library) and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.com), with no language or publication date restrictions. Randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials on the use of aromatherapy for pain relief in postcardiac surgery patients will be included. Then, two researchers will independently examine the studies based on inclusion criteria, extract data from the included studies and assess the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool from Cochrane. Data will be synthesised using Review Manager software. The strength of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The literature search, study selection, review and meta-analysis stages will be conducted from early October 2025 to April 2026.

This study is based on secondary data, and therefore ethical approval from a research ethics committee was not required. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

CRD42024568532.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major global health concern linked to cancers. Although a safe and effective vaccine exists, HPV vaccination rates are still low among Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) populations. Barriers such as limited awareness, cultural stigma and systemic inequities contribute to this gap. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compile current evidence on HPV vaccination behaviours and related factors among AAPIs to help develop culturally tailored interventions and public health strategies.

This review will include descriptive and correlational studies (quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods), examining HPV vaccination intention or uptake among AAPI populations in the USA from inception to December 2024. Randomised controlled trials and intervention studies will be excluded. Databases to be searched include PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane. Study screening, data extraction and quality assessment will be conducted independently by three reviewers using standardised tools. Risk of bias in non-randomised studies will be assessed using Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist will be used for qualitative studies. Quantitative findings will be synthesised narratively and, where appropriate, through meta-analysis using random-effects models. Qualitative themes will be synthesised to contextualise quantitative results.

Ethics approval is not required for this protocol as it does not involve primary data collection. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide critical insights for promoting HPV vaccination and reducing HPV-related cancer disparities among AAPIs.

CRD420251008431.

This study aimed to investigate the association between food insecurity and dietary intake with anxiety and depression among residents of underserved urban settlements in Bangladesh.

This cross-sectional study was used to collect data from participants through face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires. Food security status was assessed using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale, while anxiety and depression levels were measured using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9, respectively. Dietary intake was evaluated through a 24-hour dietary recall and Food Frequency Questionnaire method.

Five districts located within the Khulna Division of Bangladesh.

Residents of underserved urban areas in Bangladesh (n=749), aged ≥18 years old.

Results indicated that 22.1%, 74.6% and 44.5% of participants experienced severe food insecurity, mild to moderate food insecurity and low Household Dietary Diversity Score, with a significant portion also showing symptoms of anxiety (57.1%) and depression (57.9%). Food insecurity and Household Dietary Diversity Score were found to be positively associated with both anxiety (p

These findings highlight that food insecurity not only affects dietary habits but also exacerbates mental health outcomes. Addressing food insecurity and balanced dietary intake could therefore contribute to better mental health outcomes and overall well-being in underserved communities. Policymakers should prioritise comprehensive strategies that ensure access to nutritious foods and provide mental health support to vulnerable groups.

Scoping reviews, mapping reviews and evidence and gap maps (collectively known as ‘big picture reviews’) in health continue to gain popularity within the evidence ecosystem. These big-picture reviews are beneficial for policy-makers, guideline developers and researchers within the field of health for understanding the available evidence, characteristics, concepts and research gaps, which are often needed to support the development of policies, guidelines and practice. However, these reviews often face criticism related to poor and inconsistent methodological conduct and reporting. There is a need to understand which areas of these reviews require further methodological clarification and exploration. The aim of this project is to develop a research agenda for scoping reviews, mapping reviews and evidence and gap maps in health by identifying and prioritising specific research questions related to methodological uncertainties.

A modified e-Delphi process will be adopted. Participants (anticipated N=100) will include patients, clinicians, the public, researchers and others invested in creating a strategic research agenda for these reviews. This Delphi will be completed in four consecutive stages, including a survey collecting the methodological uncertainties for each of the big picture reviews, the development of research questions based on that survey and two further surveys and four workshops to prioritise the research questions.

This study was approved by the University of Adelaide Human Research Ethics Committee (H-2024-188). The results will be communicated through open-access peer-reviewed publications and conferences. Videos and infographics will be developed and placed on the JBI (previously Joanna Briggs Institute) Scoping Review Network webpage.

Using the community-based participatory research (CBPR) methodology, sustained peer group treatment has effectively improved medication adherence. Although many studies investigate the effectiveness of peer group therapy, there is a lack of evidence addressing the cost-effectiveness of CBPR models in low- and middle-income countries. This protocol outlines the methods for the economic evaluation of the PArticipatory Research model for medicaTIon adherenCe In People with diAbetes and hyperTEnsion (PARTICIPATE) trial to determine whether the CBPR approach to enhance medication adherence among patients with diabetes and/or hypertension is cost-effective in India.

A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from a societal perspective will be conducted alongside a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to identify, measure and evaluate the key resource and outcome impacts of a CBPR model compared with usual care aimed at improving medication adherence in adult rural Indian patients with diabetes and/or hypertension. The CEA will provide results in terms of the cost per improvement in medication adherence score, and a cost-utility analysis (CUA) will express the findings as the cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) or quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Intervention costs and effects will be projected for the population of Indian adults with diabetes and/or hypertension who are on medication, analysed over the cohort’s lifetime. Results from the modelled CUA will detail incremental costs, costs per death averted and costs per DALY averted/QALY gained for the interventions relative to the comparator. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be computed by dividing the cost difference between the intervention and comparator by the difference in benefits. Health economic evaluation methods, including a lifetime horizon, a 3% discount rate for costs and benefits and a societal perspective, will be followed. The effects of sampling uncertainty on estimated incremental costs and effectiveness parameters, as well as the influence of methodological assumptions (such as the discount rate and study perspective), will be examined through both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Relevant differences in costs, outcomes or cost-effectiveness disparities among subgroups of patients with varying baseline characteristics will also be reported. Results will be illustrated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves across a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds. Modelled CUA will broaden the target population and time frame to offer decision-makers insights into the cost-effectiveness of the CBPR approach for enhancing medication adherence. Furthermore, a return on investment analysis will be performed to express benefits in monetary terms relative to investments made, allowing for a comprehensive expression of both costs and the full spectrum of intervention benefits in monetary units.

The Institutional Ethics Committee of Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PGI, Indore, provided ethics approval. The results of the main trial and economic evaluation will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through reports to Indian Council of Medical Research and conference presentations.

Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) CTRI/2024/01/061939.

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of depression and anxiety and associated risk factors among non-communicable diseases (NCD) clinic attendees in rural Rwanda.

Cross-sectional.

44 health centres in three rural districts in Rwanda.

Adults aged 18 years and older with a clinical diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension and/or asthma, who were attending a follow-up appointment during the study period (n=595).

Primary outcome measures were depression (measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (measured by Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7). Explanatory measures included sociodemographic and behavioural risk factors associated with depression and anxiety.

Of 595 participants, 265 (44.5%) had depression (95% CI: 40.5% to 48.6%) and 202 (33.9%) had anxiety (95% CI: 30.1% to 37.9%). Comorbidity of depression and anxiety was found in 137 participants (23%). Participants with no formal education had significantly higher odds of reporting depression and anxiety compared with those with primary and secondary/higher education (adjusted OR (aOR)=2.08; 95% CI=1.27 to 3.33, p=0.004, aOR=5.00; 95% CI=1.12 to 25.00, p=0.035, respectively). In addition, participants who were unemployed were more likely to report depression and anxiety (aOR=3.03; 95% CI=1.62 to 5.67, p

The overall prevalence of depression and anxiety was found to be significantly high among the study participants. The risk factors that were associated with depression and anxiety included level of education, district of residence, employment status and past trauma exposure. The findings emphasise the need for integrating mental health screening into NCD care, district-specific interventions, employment support services and trauma-focused care.

Maintaining a healthy workforce is crucial for safe, high-quality care. To enhance well-being and engagement in Dutch university medical centres (UMCs), an overview of staff well-being and job perceptions is needed first. Surveys are widely used to improve working conditions, but varying questionnaires hinder a comprehensive view. This study aimed to evaluate the content of employee surveys currently used in UMCs in the Netherlands from a well-being perspective and to analyse the survey results at a national level.

All seven UMCs were approached to participate in the study and share employee survey data. The primary outcome of interest is work experience; a secondary analysis was conducted. Items were categorised following the Job Demands-Resources model. Descriptive statistics were presented as percentages, means and medians with IQRs.

Two UMCs participated and 31 862 completed surveys were included. Variation in survey items (eg, 15–18 subcategories, 21–33 question items), response options (eg, 1–5, 1–10), frequency (1–3 times per year) and timing were found. Scores on the following outcomes are presented: work overload, coworker support, job control, organisational justice, participation in decision-making, performance feedback, possibilities for learning and development, recognition, task variety, team atmosphere, team effectiveness, trust in leadership, other job resources, connecting/inspiring leadership, self-efficacy, goal-directiveness, boredom, burnout, job satisfaction, work engagement, other employee well-being, commitment organisation/team and work ability. Results should be interpreted with caution, and solely found for hospital A, for certain job control items, median scores of 2 or 3 were observed, whereas the majority of other question items revealed a median score of 4.

There is a significant lack of cohesion across employee surveys. As it stands, employee surveys in Dutch UMCs are not effective tools for monitoring the work experience or well-being of the healthcare workforce. While these surveys may support management decisions, this support is not reflected in interventions related to work and the work environment.

The SEV-IDF programme aims to track infants born before 33 weeks of gestation, with very low birth weight (VLBW), neonatal encephalopathy or severe birth anomalies and perinatal disease. It employs an open, prospective, multicentric, population-based cohort approach. This report aims to describe the methodology employed to establish and manage the programme, details regarding follow-up procedures, baseline characteristics of the included infants, and highlights new research opportunities emerging from the "Suivi des Enfants Vulnérables d'Ile-de-France" (SEV-IDF) programme.

The programme aims to (1) detect developmental anomalies early, (2) improve prevention using standardised data, (3) optimise follow-up care and (4) support multidisciplinary research.

Eligible participants are infants alive at discharge from the 59 maternities with a neonatal unit of the Île-de-France (IDF) region (France). A network of 567 trained physicians monitors the children’s development at 4 months, 1 and 2 years of corrected age, and 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 years of age. Collected data include sociodemographic, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics, and standardised child development scores.

The programme enrolled 21 175 participants between 2016 and 2023, with 16 461 (77.7%) having a gestational age less than 33 weeks, 1916 (9.0%) others having VLBW, 1525 (7.2%) having encephalopathy and 1273 (6.0%) having another severe birth anomaly.

The collected data will enable the SEV-IDF scientific committee to describe high-risk infants in the IDF region, design evidence-based campaigns to improve the quality and effectiveness of the follow-up as well as conduct research on developmental anomalies in these high-risk infants. Ongoing research currently focuses on anticipating loss to follow-up and early detection of developmental anomalies.

In Germany, influenza vaccination rates in at-risk groups are well below the 75% coverage recommended by the WHO. Although it has been shown that general practitioners (GPs) can play a key role in increasing their patients’ willingness to be vaccinated, this potential does not seem to have been fully used. This study aims to uncover factors that motivate GPs to vaccinate their patients against influenza, investigate the role of financial incentives in achieving higher vaccination rates and determine how the daily practice of GPs can be made more vaccination friendly.

A mixed-methods approach is employed to reach the research aims. Literature reviews will be conducted to identify factors that motivate GPs to vaccinate against influenza and to identify studies in which preferences are elicited. This is followed by semistructured interviews with GPs (n=6–10). The scoping reviews and interviews serve as a basis for the development of a quantitative survey directed at GPs which includes a discrete choice experiment. The quantitative survey will be sent to a total of 3760 GPs.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. A positive vote has been received from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association North Rhine (2024259). Study participants will only be included in the study after being given informed consent. Manuscripts will be prepared for the scoping review on motivating factors and after completion of the quantitative survey, which will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. Interim results and final results of the project will be presented at conferences.

Understanding the prognostic factors associated with the failure of total elbow replacement (TER) is crucial for informing patients about risks and enabling shared decision-making regarding TER as a definitive management option. This protocol outlines the planned analysis of National Joint Registry (NJR) data to investigate prognostic factors for TER failure.

The primary analysis will use the NJR elbow dataset, including all eligible patients who underwent TER surgery between April 2012 and December 2023. To incorporate ethnicity and comorbidities as potential prognostic factors, the NJR will be linked to the National Health Service (NHS) England Hospital Episode Statistics-Admitted Patient Care (HES-APC) data for a secondary analysis. The analysis will adhere to the REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies guidelines. The primary outcome under investigation is TER failure, defined as requiring revision surgery. Initially, the overall prognosis of TER will be examined using unadjusted net implant failure via the Kaplan-Meier method. The list of potential prognostic factors to be investigated in this study has been informed by a systematic review on this topic, input from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) groups and a survey shared with healthcare professionals providing TER services. The relationship between each potential prognostic factor and failure will be assessed using univariable regression methods. Based on the findings from our systematic review, the univariable association will also be adjusted for age, sex and indication for TER surgery using multivariable regression methods. The extent of missing data will be reported, and the reasons for missing data will be explored. A very high degree of data completeness is expected, and a complete case analysis will be performed as the primary analysis. Multiple imputations will be considered as a sensitivity analysis.

The NJR research committee approved this analysis, and the NHS Health Research Authority tool guidance dictates that the secondary use of such data for research does not require approval from a research ethics committee. The results from this analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.

NCT06760585.

Individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) is regarded as the gold standard for evidence synthesis. However, diverse recommendations and guidance on its conduct exist, and there is no consensus-based tool for the critical appraisal of a completed IPD-MA. We aim to close this gap by systematically identifying quality items and developing and validating a critical appraisal checklist for IPD-MA.

This study will comprise three phases, as follows:

Phase 1: a systematic methodology review to identify potential checklist domains and items; this will be conducted according to the Cochrane methods for systematic reviews and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis 2020 guidance. We will include studies that address methodological guides and essential statistical requirements for IPD-MA. We will use the proposed items to prepare a preliminary checklist for the e-Delphi study.

Phase 2: at least two rounds of an e-Delphi survey will be conducted among panels with expertise in IPD-MA research, consensus development, healthcare providers, journal editors, healthcare policymakers, patients and public partners from diverse geographic locations with experience in IPD-MA. Participants will use Qualtrics software to rate items on a 5-point Likert scale. The Wilcoxon matched signed rank test will estimate response stability across rounds. Consensus on including an item will be achieved if ≥75% of the panel rates the item as ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ and items will be excluded if ≥75% rates it as ‘strongly disagree’ or ‘disagree’. A convenience sample of 10 reviewers with experience in conducting an IPD-MA will pilot-test the checklist to provide practical feedback that will be used to refine the checklist.

Phase 3: critical appraisal checklist validation: to improve confidence in the tool’s uptake, a subset of the e-Delphi participants and graduate students of epidemiology and biostatistics will conduct content validity and reliability testing, respectively, per the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments.

Ethics approval has been obtained from the Western University Health Science Research Ethics Board in Canada. The validated checklist will be published in a peer-reviewed open-access journal and shared across the networks of this study’s steering committee, Cochrane IPD-MA group and the institutions’ social media platforms.

To provide insight into how people cope with living with atrial fibrillation (AF) and taking oral anticoagulants (OACs), informing how services and healthcare delivery could be improved to offer the appropriate support patients require, thereby optimising their quality of life and well-being.

A qualitative study employing focus group discussions (FGDs).

11 primary care units in a socioeconomically deprived area of the Butantan district in São Paulo, Brazil.

Adults (≥18 years) with AF purposively recruited based on sex, age and socioeconomic status.

Saturation was met with three FGDs comprising seven, five and five participants, respectively. Theme one focused on self-management, where many participants discussed their methods for adhering to dietary restrictions and alternative medications, including plant-based options and specific foods, and how they modified their daily activities to reduce AF complications and symptoms. Theme two was rationality, where participants described three main ways that they cope with taking long-term medication (often warfarin): thinking that it controls their AF symptoms; it is an obligation; it prevents morbidity and premature death. Theme three was attitude and emotions, where participants described their initial reactions of shock and fear after diagnosis and ongoing emotions of sadness and frustration due to required self-management activities and regular blood tests. Theme four was medication regimen, where participants discussed difficulties with polypharmacy, changes to AF medication (particularly from non-vitamin K antagonist OACs (NOACs) to warfarin), side effects from taking warfarin and various methods of medication management.

This study presents three key findings with implications for patient care and support. First, the shock and fear experienced during diagnosis due to a lack of knowledge about AF suggests that improvements in public knowledge about AF are needed. Second, people with additional chronic conditions may need improved care and support, given the concern participants had regarding when and how to take their medications safely. Third, improved access to NOACs may reduce the difficulties, frustrations and concerns participants had regarding warfarin use (eg, diet, dose adjustments, self-management and monthly international normalised ratio tests).

Molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) is a qualitative developmental defect of the enamel with a complex, multifactorial nature and a significant genetic component. Individuals with MIH have a compromised stomatognathic system manifested by muscle hyperactivity under postural and dynamic conditions. However, there is a gap in knowledge on the specific functional abnormalities that these individuals experience. Early identification and intervention, with a focus on the prevention of orofacial dysfunctions and deviations in facial growth and development, are aspects of the utmost importance. Therefore, the aim of the proposed study is to perform a comparative analysis of orofacial functions with an emphasis on breathing and chewing patterns in individuals with and without MIH. The secondary objective is to assess whether dentin hypersensitivity and the severity of MIH lesions are associated with alterations in orofacial functions.

Assessments will be performed using the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S). Descriptive analyses will characterise the sample. The Shapiro-Wilk test will assess normality. For normally distributed data, analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test will be used. For non-normal data, the Mann-Whitney U test will be applied. The 2 test will analyse categorical variables and compare NOT-S domains between groups. Potential confounders (eg, age, sex, socioeconomic status) will be controlled through stratification or as covariates. Logistic and Poisson regressions will model associations for categorical and count-based outcomes, respectively. Statistical significance will be set at p

This protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Nove de Julho University (certificate number: 83969924.2.0000.5511; approval date: 22 November 2024). Participants will agree to take part in the study by signing an informed consent form. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The collected data will be available on request.

NCT06692257.

In the context of global population ageing, there is a continuous and significant increase in the average age of nursing professionals. However, evidence indicates that age bias may hinder older workers’ access to the necessary support to remain active in the workforce.

This scoping review aims to map and characterise the scientific literature on age bias directed at older nursing professionals in the workplace, conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and aligned with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Databases include MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), LILACS, Scopus, APA PsycInfo and grey literature in Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review of potentially relevant articles. Another reviewer will reconcile discrepancies. Two independent reviewers will extract data from the included articles using a data extraction tool developed for this review. The results will be tabulated and presented in a diagram and/or tables and summarised to explicitly address the review’s objective.

Findings will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal.

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TR5ZK.