Conectar
To examine triggers, responses, and outcomes for patient-related violence and/or aggression events during acute hospitalisation.
This was a descriptive observational study undertaken at two healthcare organisations.
Pre-existing data were extracted from organisational incident reports and individual medical records during a retrospective period (1/1/2023 to 30/6/2023) and a prospective period (7/6/2024 to 16/11/2024). Violence and/or aggression events requiring an organisational response that involved patients hospitalised in general ward areas at a metropolitan (Site A) and a regional (Site B) site were included. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
The sample included 100 retrospective cases and 42 prospective cases. The most prevalent causes for hospitalisation related to a medical or mental health condition and dementia. Confusion and irritability were the most common forms of behaviour of concern prior to the event. Physical restraint was utilised more frequently in the prospective period compared with the retrospective period. Chemical restraint was used in approximately half of the cases in both study periods. A form of physical violence was the most prevalent behavioural symptom in both periods, followed by verbal aggression and inability to be re-directed.
Patients with a pre-existing medical condition, confusion and/or dementia are frequently involved in violent and/or aggressive events in ward settings. Physical and chemical restraints are commonly used to manage violence and aggression.
Alternative strategies are needed to manage occupational violence and aggression to minimise the need for physical and/or chemical restraint.
This study addresses a gap in evidence regarding triggers, responses and outcomes for patients exhibiting violence and aggression in ward settings during hospitalisation. Patients with dementia, confusion and irritability frequently exhibit behaviours of concern, exposing healthcare workers to potential physical and psychological harm.
STROBE checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To assess the quality of the Spanish Triage System performed by nurses according to the triage code assigned to each patient and to examine factors associated with the need for re-evaluation after completion of triage.
Retrospective longitudinal observational study.
A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients triaged in the emergency department between 2018 and 2023. Patients triaged by other healthcare professionals and those who did not receive a triage priority level were excluded.
493,211 episodes were analysed. Most were low/intermediate acuity (Level IV 65.4%, Level III 23.9%; Level I 0.1%). Mean time-to-first physician record entry increased as acuity decreased (38 min Level I vs. 81 min Level V), yet recorded time-target compliance was lowest in Levels I–II (23.8% and 14.7%). Re-evaluation occurred more often in high-acuity levels and was independently associated with older age, male sex, lower oxygen saturation and longer emergency department length of stay; compared with Level I, Levels II–III and lower adjusted odds of re-evaluation.
Nurse-led triage demonstrated coherent clinical and operational stratification; however, the lowest recorded time-target compliance in the sickest patients suggests a gap between immediate care and electronic documentation.
Streamline documentation workflows for high-acuity cases and use re-evaluation risk profiles to prioritize monitoring and escalation.
Evidence on nurse-led Spanish Triage System performance and time-documentation quality is limited. Acuity and flow metrics showed expected gradients, but target-time compliance was lowest in Levels I–II; predictors of re-evaluation were also identified. Findings support emergency department nursing, quality improvement and potential benefits for patients attending emergency departments.
STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To map and synthesise the main recommendations for arterial blood gas (ABG) collection in intensive care units (ICUs).
A scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR Checklist, supported with The PAGER framework and guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology to ensure methodological rigour and analytical comprehensiveness.
Data collection was conducted from February to April 2024. The data sources included: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, PubMed Central, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Web of Science (WoS), SCOPUS, Science Direct, Virtual Health Library (VHL), Excerpta Medica database (Embase), CAPES Thesis and Dissertation Catalogue, Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD), Scientific Open Access Repository of Portugal (RCAAP), Theses Canada and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz) repository.
Key findings recommend the radial artery as the preferred puncture site, an insertion angle of 30° to 45°, the use of 1 or 3 mL syringes and 20G or 23G gauge needles. Transport and storage at room temperature are advised. Cryoanalgesia and subcutaneous analgesia methods were found to be effective for pain management.
The review highlights the best practices for arterial blood gas collection in critical care. The synthesized evidence strengthens clinical practice, informs guidelines for intensive care nursing and promotes safer, higher-quality care for critically ill patients.
The evidence-based recommendations identified can enhance nursing care related to arterial blood gas collection. Adherence to these practices promotes safer, more humanised and evidence-based care during the procedure.
The report of this study followed the PRISMA-ScR Checklist.
There was no patient or public involvement in this scoping review.
To evaluate the impact of a 5-min delay in needle removal after haemodialysis on complications and patient satisfaction in newly created arteriovenous fistulas.
Retrospective cohort study.
This study analysed 109 patients with new arteriovenous fistulas undergoing initial cannulation 8–12 weeks post-surgery. Participants were divided into two cohorts: a conventional group (n = 42) receiving immediate needle removal after pump cessation, and a delayed group (n = 67) retaining needles for 5 min post-pump cessation before removal. Outcomes included haemostasis time, hematoma incidence, 3-month reintervention rates, and patient satisfaction measured by a 5-point scale.
Delaying needle removal by 5 min reduced mean haemostasis time by 32% compared to immediate removal (16.4 min vs. 24.1 min). Hematoma incidence decreased substantially by 76% in the delayed group (3.3% vs. 13.1%). At 3-month follow-up, reintervention rates were 66% lower with delayed removal (9.0% vs. 26.2%). Patients also reported 50% less procedure-related pain and significantly higher satisfaction scores (median 4.5 vs. 2).
A brief 5-min delay in needle removal significantly reduces complications and enhances patient-centered outcomes during early arteriovenous fistula use.
This protocol establishes an evidence-based standard for post-dialysis needle management, directly reducing compression-induced pain and reintervention needs while requiring no additional nursing resources. Implementation can immediately improve vascular access safety in haemodialysis units.
The study addresses high complication rates (26.2%) from immediate needle removal in immature fistulas. Key findings demonstrate 76% fewer hematomas and 66% lower reinterventions with 5-min delayed removal. This evidence may transform global haemodialysis nursing protocols, benefiting a substantial population of patients receiving new fistulas annually.
This study follows the STROBE checklist.
Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of this retrospective medical record analysis.
To explore factors affecting research engagement among Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals (NMAHPs) in England by examining perceptions of research capacity at organisational, team and individual levels.
Research engagement strongly correlates with improved care quality. However, NMAHPs face persistent participation barriers compared to medical colleagues, limiting the development of a multi-professional research workforce.
National descriptive cross-sectional study using a validated survey tool.
Data from NMAHPs across England were collected using the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and inferentially; qualitative free-text responses were evaluated thematically.
Perceived capacity was moderate organisationally and in teams. Organisational strengths included promoting evidence-based practice (68.7%) and leadership support (61.6%). Teams offered moderate research opportunities (58.6%) but limited mentorship (47.9%). Individually, participants showed competence in literature review (69.5%) and data collection (63.4%) but required support for funding acquisition (43.8%) and publication (50.0%). Qualitatively, research was a highly valued aspect of professional identity, though participation is severely constrained by structural conditions, including extreme resource pressures, unclear career pathways, and professional inequality.
Despite strong motivation for evidence-based practice, significant structural barriers restrict NMAHP research engagement. Strengthening capacity demands coordinated action across clinical and policy systems, ensuring equitable access to protected time, mentorship, and vital research infrastructure.
Supporting NMAHPs in research enhances evidence-informed decisions and service innovation. Embedding research into everyday clinical work, rather than viewing it as optional, builds a sustainable multi-professional culture.
This survey pinpoints the specific factors most strongly influencing NMAHP research engagement. It provides healthcare leaders actionable insights to build sustainable research infrastructure and inclusive clinical academic pathways.
This study adhered to STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional research.
No patient or public contribution.
To investigate whether patient safety culture is associated with nurses' turnover intention and to examine correlational sequential pathways involving burnout and job satisfaction, drawing on Conservation of Resources theory.
A descriptive, correlational design.
This study used data collected during 2023 from a hospital-wide patient safety culture survey conducted in four hospitals in South Korea. The sample comprised 3082 nurses from diverse units. Relationships among patient safety culture, burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention were examined using a mediation model within a structural equation modelling framework (WLSMV estimator with probit link), controlling for age and hospital tenure.
Patient safety culture was associated with lower burnout and higher job satisfaction. Burnout was associated with lower job satisfaction and with a higher likelihood of turnover intention, whereas job satisfaction was associated with a lower likelihood of turnover intention. When burnout and job satisfaction were considered together, the association between patient safety culture and turnover intention was explained through these two factors rather than by a direct pathway.
Patient safety culture functions as an organizational resource that relates to reduced burnout and enhanced job satisfaction, which together relate to lower intention to leave.
Strengthening patient safety culture—alongside efforts to reduce strain and foster positive job attitudes—may support nurse well-being and improve retention, thereby supporting continuity and safety of patient care.
This study addresses persistent nurse turnover intention in hospitals and identifies patient safety culture as an organizational lever that operates through reduced burnout and improved job satisfaction. The findings can guide nurse leaders and policymakers in hospitals to implement culture-focused strategies that support staff well-being, enhance retention, and sustain safe patient care.
STROBE guidelines were followed.
No patient or public contribution.
The aim of this study is to assess nurse practitioner students' perceptions and engagement with Isabel's artificial intelligence (AI) based differential diagnosis tool to support their decision-making skills during their theoretical and clinical placement training.
This pilot study used a cross-sectional design.
Twenty-six nurse practitioner students provided feedback on their use of an AI differential diagnosis tool in both academic and clinical contexts. This survey used the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire to assess the engagement levels and usability of the AI tool. Additional questions were included to evaluate the usage patterns, adequacy in training and confidence in diagnosis.
There were mixed engagement levels: 44.4% (n = 8/18) used Isabel in two subjects—typically one or both clinical placement units—and 27.8% (n = 5/18) in one subject; students most often used the tool to confirm differential diagnoses. Usability was rated positively with the disease ranking, red flag diagnosis and link to national guideline features demonstrating the highest student usage. While most students found the tool beneficial to use during clinical placement and completing university assignments, some reported challenges due to insufficient training, impacting confidence in clinical application.
Isabel has potential as a valuable educational tool in Nurse Practitioner programs, but successful implementation depends on adequate training and support. The findings highlight the importance of comprehensive training and support to maximise AI tool utilisation, with direct implications for programme curricula, clinical education strategies and potential improvements in diagnostic reasoning skills for future nurse practitioners.
This study provides an example of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) guided clinical decision-making training in nurse practitioner (NP) education. The findings can be used by educational institutions to trial similar AI-integrated learning approaches, enhancing diagnostic competence and potentially improving patient care outcomes.
The Study adhered to the STROBE checklist for reporting.
No patient or public contribution was made to this study.
Psychological burden is a central aspect of living with chronic cardiovascular disorders and profoundly affects how individuals experience and cope with fear, dependency and loss of control. Understanding these experiences is essential for delivering high-quality, holistic and person-centred care.
This study explored the experiences of psychological burden among individuals living with chronic cardiovascular disorders in a low- and middle-income context.
We conducted a qualitative descriptive study. Nineteen individuals were purposively recruited using maximum variation sampling and interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide between May and September 2024. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis software (MAXQDA).
The analysis of 19 interviews generated three overarching themes: (a) multifaceted disruption of life from acute onset to enduring dependency; (b) burden of existential fear and struggle for control; and (c) faith-based burden management: prayer, practice and spiritual resilience.
Individuals with chronic cardiovascular disorders experience a significant psychological burden, including sudden illness onset, dependency and existential fear, despite available treatment. Faith, family and community support serve as key sources of coping. The integration of psychological care, spiritual support and culturally sensitive interventions alongside biomedical management is essential for improving outcomes in low and middle-income countries.
Health care professionals should integrate psychological screening and counselling to address existential fears, social withdrawal and suppressed emotional expression among individuals with chronic cardiovascular disorders.
Patients with chronic cardiovascular disorders informed the design of the interview guide, participated in interviews and helped validate the interpretation of findings, ensuring that the study reflected their lived experiences.
This study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ).
Nanocrystalline silver dressings are increasingly used as alternatives to silver sulfadiazine dressings in burn management, but comparative evidence remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nanocrystalline silver dressings versus silver sulfadiazine dressings in burn patients.
Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251060978).
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from inception through April 2025.
Randomized controlled trials comparing nanocrystalline silver dressings with silver sulfadiazine dressings in burn patients were included. Primary outcomes were wound healing time and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included complete re-epithelialization rates and dressing change frequency. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Evidence certainty was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.
Eight randomized controlled trials (724 patients) were included. Nanocrystalline silver dressings significantly reduced wound healing time (mean difference [MD] = −3.29 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −3.82 to −2.76; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%) and dressing change frequency (MD = −8.76, 95% CI: −12.68 to −4.85; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 94%). No significant differences were found in re-epithelialization rates (odds ratio = 1.08, p = 0.80) or adverse events (risk difference = −0.00, p = 0.99). Evidence certainty was low to very low across all outcomes.
Nanocrystalline silver dressings may offer advantages over silver sulfadiazine dressings in reducing wound healing time and dressing change frequency in burn patients, but the overall certainty of evidence is low to very low. Future well-powered, multicenter trials with standardized outcomes and extended follow-up are needed.
These findings support the consideration of nanocrystalline silver dressings for burn wound management, particularly for reducing wound healing time and nursing workload associated with dressing changes. However, dressing selection should be guided by burn depth, infection risk, patient-specific factors, and resource availability.
We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines, particularly the PRISMA checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
PROSPERO CRD420251060978.
FreshRSS 