Conectar
Commentary on: Sushko K, Strachan P, Butt M, Nerenberg K, Sherifali D. Supporting self-management in women with pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy: a mixed-methods sequential comparative case study. BMC nursing. 2024 Jan 2;23(1):1.
Implications for practice and research Policies are required to support self-management of diabetes during labour and delivery in practice. Future research should focus on developing and implementing interventions to support self-management of diabetes during labour and delivery.
Sushko et al
To generate an in-depth understanding of the perceptions and experiences of individuals with youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) to inform knowledge translation initiatives and clinical care.
Interpretive descriptive qualitative study.
Individuals were eligible to participate if they received a T2D diagnosis on or before 18 years of age, resided in Manitoba, and were between 10 and 25 years of age at the time of data collection. Twenty-two individuals (13 females, 7 males, 2 prefer not to indicate gender; mean age = 19.3 years) participated in 22 semi-structured interviews (mean length: 29:01 min) remotely using Zoom video conferencing software or by telephone. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
Four themes were generated: (1) Low public knowledge, misconceptions, and stigma impact youth experiences including those of diagnosis, disclosure, treatment, and supports; (2) shared familial experiences impacts perception of the future; (3) mental and emotional wellness is critically important but requires more attention; and (4) T2D carries unanticipated positive and negative impacts for youth.
Findings illustrate the complex interrelationships between public and personal conceptions of T2D, stigma, and T2D navigation, emphasising the centrality of emotional and mental well-being to participants' T2D experiences and management. This representation of experiences and perceptions of youth onset T2D offers direction for holistic and youth-centred research and care and highlights areas where further mental health and educational resources would be beneficial.
The knowledge translation resource being developed from this study involves input from patient and public partners.
To canvas the contemporary contextual forces within the Australian residential aged care sector and argue for new research and innovation. There is a pressing need to provide systematised, high-quality and person-centred care to our ageing populations, especially for those who rely on residential care. This paper advances a warrant for establishing a new systematic framework for assessment and management that serves as a foundation for effective person-centred care delivery.
Position paper.
This paper promulgates the current dialogue among key stakeholders of quality residential aged care in Australia, including clinicians, regulatory agencies, researchers and consumers. A desktop review gathered relevant literature spanning research, standards and guidelines regarding current and future challenges in aged care in Australia.
This position paper explores the issues of improving the quality and safety of residential aged care in Australia, including the lingering impact of COVID-19 and incoming reforms. It calls for nurse-led research and innovation to deliver tools to address these challenges.
The paper proposes an appropriate holistic, evidence-based nursing framework to optimise the quality and safety of residential aged care in Australia.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
This May, the World Health Assembly (WHA) will vote on re-establishing a mandate for the WHO to address the health consequences of nuclear weapons and war.
The first atomic bomb exploded in the New Mexico desert 80 years ago, in July 1945. Three weeks later, two relatively small (by today’s standards), tactical-size nuclear weapons unleashed a cataclysm of radioactive incineration on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. By the end of 1945, about 213 000 people were dead.
Last December, Nihon Hidankyo, a movement that brings together atomic bomb survivors, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for its ‘efforts to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons...
To synthesise evidence on the types of Medication Management Services (MMS) and establish the effect of the different MMS interventions on Economic, Clinical and Humanistic Outcomes (ECHO) in dialysis patients.
Integrative review.
A systematic search was conducted from May to June 2024 using four databases: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library and Web of Science.
This review followed Whittemore and Knafl's framework and adhered to the PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by three reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool and the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set. Only English-language articles, primary and quality improvement studies were included, with no restrictions on publication date. Findings were narratively synthesised and thematically grouped by review aims.
A total of 14 articles were included. This review identified (1) the types of MMS provided to renal dialysis patients, and (2) the effects of these services on ECHO. Services varied in practices, including obtaining accurate medication histories, identifying discrepancies, reviewing laboratory results, making recommendations to prescribers, resolving issues based on collaborative agreements and providing patient education. These services were compared in terms of economic outcomes (e.g., 30-day readmission rates), clinical outcomes (e.g., medication discrepancies, MRPs, laboratory and clinical parameters) and humanistic outcomes (e.g., medication burden-related quality of life).
This review highlighted various types of MMS available for dialysis patients and their impact on ECHO. Key benefits include recognising medication discrepancies, reducing MRPs, improving laboratory and clinical parameters, lowering 30-day readmission rates and enhancing medication burden-related quality of life. However, limitations such as retrospective studies, English-only publications and limited comparison across MMS models highlight the need for additional robust and diverse research.
This integrative review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
An analysis of mental health nursing de-escalation logs for 249 days from a regional adult inpatient unit in New South Wales, Australia, was completed to identify groups of cooccurring nursing therapeutic responses to aggression and examine their associations with reductions in restrictive practices and situational aggression.
A single-centre retrospective study was undertaken.
Hierarchical clustering of nursing interventions established groups of cooccurring nursing responses. Poisson mixed-effect models were then used to determine the associations of the intervention clusters with restrictive practices.
Two intervention clusters emerged: Cluster 1 involved verbal de-escalation with active listening and rapport building, whereas Cluster 2 included additional limit setting and problem-solving, distraction, sensory modulation, environmental change and individual staff time. Cluster 1 was linked with a reduction in seclusion use by 83% [IRR = 0.17, 95% CI (0.07, 0.41), p < 0.001], physical restraint by 79% [IRR = 0.21, 95% CI (0.11, 0.40), p < 0.001] and average judged situational aggression by 1.56 [95% CI (0.86, 2.25), p < 0.001]. Cluster 2 was related to statistically insignificant increases in the three studied outcomes.
The intervention clusters prove the value of supplementary tools in surfacing nurses' therapeutic potential. The differences in restrictive practice use between intervention clusters signal the structure and progression of forming therapeutic relationships in aid of de-escalation and the possibility of assessing de-escalation components robustly.
Acknowledging and supporting nurses' therapeutic work support the development of recovery-oriented care and a positive professional identity for nurses.
This study followed the applicable STROBE guidelines.
Due to the study's retrospective nature, there was no service user or public involvement.
A whole person approach to healthy aging can provide insight into social factors that may be critical. Digital technologies, such as mobile health (mHealth) applications, hold promise to provide novel insights for healthy aging and the ability to collect data between clinical care visits. Machine learning/artificial intelligence methods have the potential to uncover insights into healthy aging. Nurses and nurse informaticians have a unique lens to shape the future use of this technology.
The purpose of this research was to apply machine learning methods to MyStrengths+MyHealth de-identified data (N = 988) for adults 45 years of age and older. An exploratory data analysis process guided this work.
Overall (n = 988), the average Strength was 66.1% (SD = 5.1), average Challenges 66.5% (SD = 7.5), and average Needs 60.06% (SD = 3.1). There was a significant difference between Strengths and Needs (p < 0.001), between Challenges and Needs (p < 0.001), and no significant differences between average Strengths and Challenges. Four concept groups were identified from the data (Thinking, Moving, Emotions, and Sleeping). The Thinking group had the most statistically significant challenges (11) associated with having at least one Thinking Challenge and the highest average Strengths (66.5%) and Needs (83.6%) compared to the other groups.
This retrospective analysis applied machine learning methods to de-identified whole person health resilience data from the MSMH application. Adults 45 and older had many Strengths despite numerous Challenges and Needs. The Thinking group had the highest Strengths, Challenges, and Needs, which aligns with the literature and highlights the co-occurring health challenges experienced by this group. Machine learning methods applied to consumer health data identify unique insights applicable to specific conditions (e.g., cognitive) and healthy aging. The next steps involve testing personalized interventions with nurses leading artificial intelligence integration into clinical care.
To summarise the evidence and present the state of the science on pressure injury care bundles in the community. Specifically, this review examined (i) the extent of pressure injury by studying its prevalence and incidence in the last 10 years, (ii) the risk factors associated with community-acquired pressure injury and (iii) the components and outcomes associated with effective pressure injury care bundles in the community.
PI care bundles have effectively reduced PI rates; however, there is limited evidence of care bundles used in community settings.
Integrative review.
This integrative review is guided by the Whittemore and Knafl framework and follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Quality appraisal was applied to assess the quality of selected articles. Data relevant to the review aims were extracted, and findings were synthesised and presented. PubMed, Medline, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched. Studies published in the English language between 2012 and 2022 were retrieved.
A total of 89 articles were retrieved; 25 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies reported the point prevalence and period prevalence of community-acquired pressure injuries, and only one study reported the incidence of community-acquired pressure injuries. The point prevalence and period prevalence of community-acquired pressure injury were 0.02% to 10.8% and 2.7% to 86.4%, respectively, and the cumulative incidence was 1.3%. The risk factors for community-acquired pressure injury assessed vary between studies; older age, poor nutrition, immobility and multiple comorbidities are commonly reported. Socioeconomic and caregiving factors were not studied. Very few studies evaluated pressure injury care bundles in the community. Even so, the components of the pressure injury care bundle vary between studies.
Pressure injury development is associated with a complex interplay of factors. Socioeconomic and caregiving factors were not examined in any of the papers. There is a lack of understanding of the components and outcomes associated with effective pressure injury care bundles in the community.
Despite their prevalence, community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPIs) are often underreported due to inadequate follow-up and reporting mechanisms. Although the risk factors for CAPIs vary across studies, older age, impaired mobility, multiple comorbidities and malnutrition consistently emerge as key contributors. Pressure injury preventive care bundles are more commonly used in the acute care setting rather than the community setting.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To identify best practices to prevent violence against healthcare workers by patients at risk for aggression in the adult inpatient setting.
An integrative review.
Conducted using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals Model. Title and abstract screening on 4186 articles resulted in 156 for full text review. Full text screening yielded 14 articles that met inclusion criteria.
A search of the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and JBI from January 2019 to February 2023.
The review revealed behavioural intervention teams, environmental changes, and coordinated communication plans were the most used strategies, however none demonstrated significant decreases in violence.
Health systems can implement strategies shown to decrease the incidence of violence in healthcare settings globally. Lack of consistency in the evidence suggests the need for further research to assess mitigating strategies for violence against healthcare workers in inpatient hospital settings.
Patient safety is a cornerstone of nursing practice; however, healthcare workers need to feel safe in their work environment. Violent events are chronically underreported, ill defined, and when reported, do not address change in the practice setting. Identifying strategies to address escalating behaviour before it results in violence is crucial for everyone's safety.
This integrative review exposes the scarcity of evidence available to address rising concerns about patients on healthcare provider violence (Type II) in the workplace. Although several assessment tools for identifying violent patients exist, evidence regarding prevention is woefully absent. The review highlights potential interventions for further study to equip healthcare workers to manage patients safely and effectively before an escalation occurs.
PRISMA checklist for integrative reviews.
No patient or public contribution was part of this review.
To explore and describe acute care nurses’ decisions to recognise and respond to improvement in patients’ clinical states as they occurred in the real-world clinical environment.
A descriptive study.
Nine medical and eleven surgical nurses in a large Australian metropolitan hospital were individually observed during nurse–patient interactions and followed up in interview to describe their reasoning and clinical judgements behind observed decisions. Verbal description of observations and interviews were recorded and transcribed. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
The three themes constructed from the data were as follows: nurses checking in; nurses reaching judgements about improvements; and nurses deciding on the best person to respond. Acute care nurses made targeted assessment decisions based on predicted safety risks related to improvement in clinical states. Subjective and objective cues were used to assess for and make judgements about patient improvement. Acute care nurses’ judgment of patient safety and a desire to promote patient centred care guided their decisions to select the appropriate person to manage improvement.
The outcomes of this research have demonstrated that the proven safety benefits of acute care nurses’ decision making in response to deterioration extend to improvement in patients’ clinical states. In response to improvement, acute care nurses’ decisions protect patients from harm and promote recovery.
Early recognition and response to improvement enable acute care nurses to protect patients from risks of unnecessary treatment and promote recovery.
This study makes explicit nurses’ essential safety role in recognising and responding to improvement in patients’ clinical states. Healthcare policy and education must reflect the equal importance of assessment for and management of deterioration and improvement to ensure patients are protected and provided with safe care.
Building resilience among nurses has been postulated as one of the key strategies to support nurses and retain them in the profession. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, of spaced education pedagogy in enhancing Nurses' knowledge on emotional resilience. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the usability and acceptability of delivery of the training via a mobile application in one's own mobile device.
A quasi-experimental study with single group pre-test and post-test trial was conducted.
Full-time registered nurses working in an acute care hospital were invited to participate from June 2021 to June 2022. The group used the mobile application daily for 1 month. Pre-test measurement includes socio-demographic data and baseline resilience level before the intervention. Post-test measurement includes resilience level, usability and acceptability of mobile-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy measured upon completion of the training. The mobile application enabled the delivery of resilience educational content in small quantities through a repeating manner, with a concurrent evaluation of learner's understanding.
When compared to their baseline (mean = 24.38, SD = 5.50), participants reported significant increase in the Connor-Davison Resilience Scale score (mean = 26.33, SD = 5.57) (t = −4.40, p < 0.001). Upon 1 month usage of the mobile application, a higher percentage of the participants reported intermediate to high level of resilience (57.4%), as compared to prior usage (54.7%). Respondents reported knowledge of most useful strategies for their daily lives including: (i) managing negative emotions (54.1%); (ii) psychoeducation about mental health and the risks of burnout (44.7%); (iii) achieving work and life balance (43.5%); and (iv) depiction of workplace scenarios to demonstrate what can be and cannot be controlled during times of change (43.5%). Participants reported usability of the mobile application with a mean SUS score 70.5 (SD = 13.0), which was considered “acceptable.” Overall, 82.3% of the participants found the mobile application appealing, 64.7% reported they were likely to use the mobile application in the future and 72.9% would recommend it to other nurses.
The mobile application provided nurses with the availability and convenience to access resilience building learning content integrated with the spaced education pedagogy.
The use of mobile-assisted cognitive behavioral training can aid in increasing nurses' resilience level. Nurses provided acceptable usability ratings and satisfactory acceptance of receiving training via the mobile application, showing promising opportunities in the improvement of overall well-being.
To identify, synthesise and map systematic reviews of the effectiveness of nursing interventions undertaken in a neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery.
This scoping review was conducted according to the JBI scoping review framework.
Review included systematic reviews that evaluated any nurse-initiated interventions that were undertaken in an NICU or SCN setting. Studies that reported one or more positive outcomes related to the nursing interventions were only considered for this review. Each outcome for nursing interventions was rated a ‘certainty (quality) of evidence’ according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria.
Systematic reviews were sourced from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis for reviews published until February 2023.
A total of 428 articles were identified; following screening, 81 reviews underwent full-text screening, and 34 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Multiple nursing interventions reporting positive outcomes were identified and were grouped into seven categories. Respiratory 7/34 (20%) and Nutrition 8/34 (23%) outcomes were the most reported categories. Developmental care was the next most reported category 5/34 (15%) followed by Thermoregulation, 5/34 (15%) Jaundice 4/34 (12%), Pain 4/34 (12%) and Infection 1/34 (3%).
This review has identified nursing interventions that have a direct positive impact on neonatal outcomes. However, further applied research is needed to transfer this empirical knowledge into clinical practice.
Implementing up-to-date evidence on effective nursing interventions has the potential to significantly improving neonatal outcomes.
No patient or public involvement in this scoping review.
To investigate clients' perspectives about outcomes of a telehealth residential unit (RU) program for families experiencing complex early parenting issues, and to explore facilitators and barriers to positive client outcomes.
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with mothers (n = 18) admitted to a telehealth RU program. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.
Mothers reported short-term improvements in their child's presenting issues (e.g. feeding to sleep, night-time waking, co-sleeping), increased confidence and increased partner involvement. According to participants, program outcomes were facilitated by a positive parent–clinician relationship, the accessibility of clinicians and being able to take part in the program from their own home. Barriers included difficulties with technical equipment and connecting with the clinician overnight, and challenges with implementing strategies in the longer term.
This nurse-led telehealth program was viewed positively by parents and the study identified a number of areas for improvement.
Telehealth early parenting programs provide an important way for parents to receive support with early child sleep, settling and feeding issues. Clinicians working in this area should focus on the development of positive parent–nurse relationships, enhancing communication and availability for parents during overnight periods and supporting parents to develop early parenting skills that will be applicable across the early childhood period.
The study is the first to address client experiences of a telehealth RU program. Facilitators and barriers identified will inform service improvements to the program going forward, and similar telehealth programs for families; to ensure benefits and service outcomes are maximised for parents for such a crucial service.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines for qualitative research were followed.
FreshRSS 