Building a Delphi‐Informed Transitional Care Programme Guided by the Omaha System for Gynaecologic Oncology Patients

ABSTRACT

Objective

This study aimed to develop and validate a standardised transitional care programme for postoperative gynaecologic cancer patients utilising the Omaha system framework.

Methods

A preliminary transitional care programme was constructed through literature review, semi-structured interviews and multidisciplinary team discussions. The programme was refined via two rounds of Delphi expert consultations involving 17 oncology nursing specialists. Consensus criteria included expert authority coefficient (Cr), Kendall's W test and coefficient of variation (CV).

Results

The Delphi consultation demonstrated robust expert consensus, with high authority coefficients (Cr: 0.886 in Round 1; 0.906 in Round 2), exceptional participation rates (88.2% and 100% response rates across two rounds) and statistically significant concordance as evidenced by Kendall's W values (0.233–0.358 and 0.326–0.383; all p < 0.01). All coefficients of variation (CV) metrics fell within acceptable ranges (0.09–0.42 in the initial phase; 0.08–0.27 post-refinement).

Conclusion

The Omaha system-based transitional care programme exhibits strong expert consensus, scientific rigour and clinical applicability, providing a structured approach to improving postoperative recovery in gynaecologic cancer patients.

Relevance to Clinical Practice

This protocol standardises postoperative care transitions for gynaecologic oncology patients by integrating multidimensional assessments (physiological, psychosocial and health behaviour domains) and family-centred education. Clinicians can utilise its evidence-based framework to reduce preventable complications, enhance caregiver preparedness and improve continuity of care between hospital and home settings.

Patient or Public Contribution

Six postoperative gynaecologic cancer patients and eight family caregivers participated in semi-structured interviews to identify unmet transitional care needs. Their insights informed the design of intervention components, including self-management education and psychosocial support strategies. Patients reviewed draft materials for clarity and cultural appropriateness during Delphi Round 2.