Conectar
Lymphoma is a haematologic malignancy affecting cells of the immune system. With numerous treatment options available, clinicians and patients frequently face difficulty in selecting the most appropriate therapy. Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) offers valuable patients’ insight that may support treatment differentiation. A PRO measure (PROM) is a questionnaire or survey measuring a PRO. Despite many efforts to guide the selection of PROMs in clinical trials, choosing the appropriate ones remains a challenge. This study aims to develop a pragmatic paradigm for selecting PROMs in clinical trials involving adult patients with lymphoma through the collaboration and communication between clinical investigators involved in trials and Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) scientists specialised in research methodologies.
A rapid review was conducted to identify existing PROMs for adult patients with lymphoma in clinical trials and guidelines supporting PROM selection.
PubMed, Google Scholar and websites for regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) bodies in eight countries of interest were searched from 2009 to July 2024.
Publications with PROMs were identified for adult patients in lymphoma trials. The most relevant guidelines supporting the development of the pragmatic paradigm were selected.
The initial search and data extraction were conducted by one author. All authors participated in an in-depth review process.
We categorise 31 applicable PROMs for lymphoma into four distinct groups, streamlining the PROM selection process to facilitate effective communication among clinical investigators, HEOR scientists, patients and others. Additionally, a five-step pragmatic paradigm is developed for identifying appropriate PROM(s).
The pragmatic paradigm presents a practical approach for selecting PROM(s) in lymphoma clinical trials. An appropriate PROM should conceptually align with the treatment goals and be acceptable to regulatory and HTA bodies. Thus, lymphoma clinical trials can generate more patient-focused data, contributing to improving patients’ quality of life and advancing lymphoma care.
In response to global outcries of poor healthcare, organisational interventions have been implemented with the aim of promoting compassionate care. An overall synthesis of qualitative data, including the perspectives of healthcare staff who have attended interventions, can establish ‘what works’ and inform future interventions.
To synthesise existing research exploring how healthcare staff experience organisational interventions for compassionate care.
Qualitative evidence synthesis.
A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted in August 2023. Five databases were searched: MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles. Articles met the following criteria: (a) reported on the experiences of healthcare staff who had participated in organisational interventions for compassionate care, (b) taken place in a healthcare setting, (c) use of a qualitative or mixed-methods methodology, (d) published in English and (e) published since 2010. A thematic synthesis was conducted using NVivo software to synthesise findings. Data from the complete ‘findings/results’ sections were included in the synthesis. The final search protocol and search strategy were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023472404) and are reported using the PRISMA guidelines.
Eighteen qualitative or mixed-methods studies were included in the review, encapsulating the experiences of healthcare staff across eight countries. Four themes were identified: (1) holding back, (2) humanising healthcare, (3) values are instilled and (4) sustainability is important.
Organisational interventions for compassionate health care are valued and appreciated by healthcare staff and foster reflection and connection. Interventions facilitate clinical creativity, improve staff well-being and strengthen communication between staff.
The implementation of organisational interventions for compassionate care should be encouraged in healthcare settings. Interventions that consider organisational cultures are driven by organisational values and are embedded with sustainability in mind can improve staff well-being and positively impact the provision of patient care.
PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this review.
FreshRSS 